Development of fatigue prediction model for steel bridges based on characteristics of variable stress spectra
Source abstract
Abstract
The fatigue life prediction of steel bridges depends on the amplitude, stress ratio, stress interaction (stress order), and frequency of variable stress spectra. The stress interaction is always altering the crack growth rate under the application of variable stress spectra. The random nature of variable stress spectra makes it difficult to model all these influential parameters correctly. In this study, the fatigue prediction model of steel bridges based on linear elastic fracture mechanics was developed by using measured variable stress spectra of three steel bridges. Variable stress spectra data are used to calculate and analyze the entropy index of stress interaction and crack severity index (CSI) of the effective stress associated with the characteristics of the variable stress spectra. Using these results, the results of fatigue analysis, and multiple regression, we develop prediction models for entropy index–CSI–fatigue crack length, average daily truck traffic (ADTT)–CSI–fatigue crack length, and ADTT-entropy-fatigue crack length. These models can predict the fatigue life of a bridge structure, and this information can be used to plan lifetime maintenance for similar bridges with variable stress spectra.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Gas Safety R&D, Korea Gas Safety Corporation, Eumseong-gun, Korea
Global Loss Control Center, Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance, Seoul, Korea
Department of Civil Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.160-162.121710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.160-162.1217 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.00310.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.003 ↗
3. Aktepe B · 1999
4. 10.1177/105678950934308210.1177/1056789509343082 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.03910.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.039 ↗
6. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.462-463.48910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.462-463.489 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.bpa.2005.07.00910.1016/j.bpa.2005.07.009 ↗
8. Beretta S and Villa A (2010) A RV approach for the analysis of fatigue crack growth with NASGRO equation. In: ASRANet2010-conference , Edinburgh, UK, 14–16 June.
9. 10.1088/0964-1726/12/3/32010.1088/0964-1726/12/3/320 ↗
10. de Jonge JB (1994) The crack severity index of monitored load spectra. In: An Assessment of Fatigue and Crack Growth Prediction Techniques . France: Bordeaux.
11. 10.1016/0142-1123(82)90018-410.1016/0142-1123(82)90018-4 ↗
12. Fisher JW · 1984
13. 10.1016/0001-6160(85)90244-510.1016/0001-6160(85)90244-5 ↗
14. 10.1177/105678950910191710.1177/1056789509101917 ↗
15. Garcia W, Bair R and Caruso P (2006) F-22 force management overcoming challenges to maintain a robust usage tracking program. In: USAF ASIP conference , San Antonio, TX, 28–30 November.
16. 10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00043-710.1016/S0143-974X(99)00043-7 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.03.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.03.004 ↗
18. Iwasaki T · Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering (Japanese) · 1982 · 20 · 194
19. Jackson KJ and Bandara SB (2002) Structural condition monitoring of roval Australian air force F-111 and F/A 18 aircraft. In: The 6th joint FAA/DoD/NASA ageing aircraft conference , San Fransisco, CA, 16–19 September.
20. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.06.01210.1016/j.cmpb.2005.06.012 ↗
21. Kassim SA-R · Material Science Engineering · 2008 · 486 · 58510.1016/j.msea.2007.10.083 ↗
22. 10.1177/105678951244880310.1177/1056789512448803 ↗
23. 10.1016/0167-4730(90)90011-D10.1016/0167-4730(90)90011-D ↗
24. Korea Infrastructure Safety Corporation (1999) Study on fatigue assessment and integrity evaluation through variable stress measurement. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport .
25. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.00210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.002 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.probengmech.2011.02.00110.1016/j.probengmech.2011.02.001 ↗
27. 10.2514/1.C00025010.2514/1.C000250 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.08.00310.1016/j.strusafe.2009.08.003 ↗
29. Marco AM and Jaime TPC (2001) Propagation of 2D fatigue cracks under complex loading. In: 56o Congresso Anual da ABM - 16 a 19 de julho de , Belo Horizonte, MG.
30. McCuster N and Penistone N (1999) The HAWK fatigue management system. In: The proceedings of 20th symposium of the international committee on aeronautical fatigue , Bellevue, Washington, USA, 14–16 July. Dayton-Ohio: EPIC.
31. 10.1177/105678950910364410.1177/1056789509103644 ↗
32. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00330.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00330.x ↗
33. NASGRO (2002) NASGRO Reference Manual (version 4.02). San Antonio, TX: Southwest Research Institute.
34. nCode · 2003
35. Ohrloff N · 1988
36. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.01010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.010 ↗
37. 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x ↗
38. Simpson DL · 1997
39. Spiekhout DJ (1998) F-16 loads/usage monitoring. In: RTO meeting proceedings exploitation of structural loads/health data for reduced life cycle cost , North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Brussels, Belgium, 11–12 May. RTO AVT Panel.
40. Steve RA (1998) Future fatigue monitoring systems. In: Exploitation of Structural Loads/Heath Data for Reduced Life Cycle Costs . Brussels, Belgium: NATO Science and Technology Organization.
41. 10.1016/0142-1123(90)90456-O10.1016/0142-1123(90)90456-O ↗
42. 10.21236/ADA95651710.21236/ADA956517 ↗
43. Yool K · 2006
44. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1987.tb00210.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1987.tb00210.x ↗
45. 10.1016/S0167-4730(98)00020-410.1016/S0167-4730(98)00020-4 ↗
46. Zheng X and Roy RJ (1999) Depth of anaesthesia estimation by adaptive-networkbased fuzzy inference system. In: 21st annual conference in engineering in medicine and biology , Atlanta, GA, 13–16 October.
47. 10.1177/105678951039707710.1177/1056789510397077 ↗