Fracturing speed, fracture toughness, and boundary conditions in fast hydraulic fracturing
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent studies have revisited near-sonic and supersonic crack growth, particularly in mode I fractures, challenging the traditional belief that cracks cannot exceed the Rayleigh wave speed ( {c}R ). While classical fracture mechanics suggest that mode I fractures are limited to {c}R , recent work shows that cracks can surpass both shear wave velocity ( {c}S ) and dilatation wave speed ( {c}P ) under certain conditions. This paper investigates pressure-induced fracturing in porous media, where high fluid injection rates can lead to crack propagation speeds exceeding wave velocities. Using a hybrid peridynamic/finite-element model, where failure and cracks are characterized by a damage model, we simulate the dynamic hydraulic fracture propagation in a rectangular porous domain and explore the influence of fracture energy (related to fracture toughness), permeability, and boundary conditions on crack behavior. Results reveal that forerunning (mother–daughter) fracture events, and mixed lifting-separation and crack-like propagation mechanisms, significantly accelerate crack growth, particularly under low-permeability conditions. We also include a validation of the model through comparison with results from extended finite-element method. These findings have important implications for earthquake rupture dynamics, volcanic activity, and hydraulic fracturing in geophysical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Numerical methods in engineering · earthquake and tectonic studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chengdu University of Technology
University of Padova
Institute for Advanced Study, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province · State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection Independent Research Project
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/105678951665191910.1177/1056789516651919 ↗
2. 10.1029/JB081i032p0567910.1029/JB081i032p05679 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41561-022-01055-510.1038/s41561-022-01055-5 ↗
4. 10.1121/1.190824110.1121/1.1908241 ↗
5. 10.1177/105678952199120710.1177/1056789521991207 ↗
6. 10.1038/nature0209610.1038/nature02096 ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1973.tb00608.x10.1111/j.1365-246X.1973.tb00608.x ↗
8. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2016.09.01110.1016/j.mechrescom.2016.09.011 ↗
9. 10.1038/nature0391010.1038/nature03910 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cma.2025.11777710.1016/j.cma.2025.117777 ↗
11. 10.1017/CBO978051154676110.1017/CBO9780511546761 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10557010.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105570 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10704-016-0121-y10.1007/s10704-016-0121-y ↗
14. Lewis RW, Lewis RW, Schrefler B (1998) The Finite Element Method in the Static and Dynamic Deformation and Consolidation of Porous Media. John Wiley & Sons.
15. 10.3390/app1108334410.3390/app11083344 ↗
16. 10.3390/en1418572510.3390/en14185725 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cma.2023.11637610.1016/j.cma.2023.116376 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2025.10442910.1016/j.ijplas.2025.104429 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.10637210.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106372 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cma.2020.11310110.1016/j.cma.2020.113101 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.10402410.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104024 ↗
22. Ni T Zaccariotto M Zhu Q et al. (2023b) Matrix-based implementation and GPU acceleration of linearized ordinary state-based peridynamic models in Matlab. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.11273.
23. 10.1080/15376494.2019.160223710.1080/15376494.2019.1602237 ↗
24. Ni T, Zhang J, Zaccariotto M, et al. (2024b) Matrix-based implementation and GPU acceleration of hybrid FEM and peridynamic model for hydro-mechanical coupled problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 125: e7504.
25. 10.1126/science.117466410.1126/science.1174664 ↗
26. 10.1029/2019JB01730410.1029/2019JB017304 ↗
27. Raiesi A, Kharazi M (2025) An elastoplastic-damage model based on nonlocal peridynamic theory for ductile damage analysis under cyclic loading. International Journal of Damage Mechanics 10567895251324595.
28. 10.1126/science.adi151910.1126/science.adi1519 ↗
29. 10.1126/science.284.5418.133710.1126/science.284.5418.1337 ↗
30. 10.1080/0001873021012232810.1080/00018730210122328 ↗
31. Shi C, Zhang S, Zhang X, et al. (2024) Peridynamics simulations of the damage of reinforced concrete structures under radial blasting. International Journal of Damage Mechanics 34: 10567895241292745.
32. Shu Y, Shen Z, Ni T, et al. (2025) FEM-peridynamic modelling of supershear earthquake ruptures in dry and fluid saturated media. Submitted to Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (under review).
33. 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-010.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-0 ↗
34. Slepyan LI (2012) Models and Phenomena in Fracture Mechanics. Berlin; Heidelberg; New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
35. 10.1016/0045-7825(94)90168-610.1016/0045-7825(94)90168-6 ↗
36. 10.1007/BF0003221710.1007/BF00032217 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.11.01710.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.11.017 ↗
38. 10.1126/science.adg769310.1126/science.adg7693 ↗
39. 10.1177/1056789522110565410.1177/10567895221105654 ↗
40. 10.1016/0022-5096(94)90003-510.1016/0022-5096(94)90003-5 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.cma.2017.11.01110.1016/j.cma.2017.11.011 ↗