journal article·2021-09

Validation of the ductile fracture modeling of CGI at quasi-static loading conditions

Senad Razanica, Lennart B Josefson, Ragnar Larsson, Torsten Sjögren

Publisher page

Abstract

Fracture modeling and experimental validation of Compacted Graphite Iron (CGI) specimens loaded under quasi-static conditions at room temperature are considered. Continuum damage mechanics coupled to plasticity is adopted to describe the evolution of damage. The damage production is based on a recently developed rate dependent damage evolution law, where the damage–plasticity coupling is modeled based on a damage driving energy that involves both stored energy and plasticity contributions. To describe ductile fracture accounting for stress triaxiality on the damage initiation, the inelastic contribution to the damage driving energy is controlled by the Johnson-Cook failure criterion. Three different damage models are defined based on elastic/inelastic damage driving energies. The damage models are validated against experiments on a set of notched specimens made of CGI with different notch geometries, where the global force-displacement curves and corresponding strain fields are obtained using digital image correlation technology. It is shown from the testing and the simulations that plastic strains generally need to be accounted for in order to properly describe the different failure processes of the CGI specimens. In addition, the ductile damage model is shown to more accurately predict the experimental force-displacement response as compared to the more simplistic stress drop, element deletion technique.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Fatigue and fracture mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Material and Computational Mechanics, Department of Industrial and Materials Science, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden

Division of Materials and Production, Department of Manufacturing Processes, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Borås, Sweden

Funding

Family Ekmans Research Donation · Swedish National Research Program FFI, Strategic Vehicle Research and Innovation

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00466-014-1109-y10.1007/s00466-014-1109-y ↗
2. 10.1007/s00466-015-1151-410.1007/s00466-015-1151-4 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-210.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
4. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
5. 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-910.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-9 ↗
6. 10.1016/0021-8928(67)90034-210.1016/0021-8928(67)90034-2 ↗
7. Davis J · 1996
8. 10.1002/cnm.70010.1002/cnm.700 ↗
9. 10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-210.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
10. 10.1098/rsta.1951.001610.1098/rsta.1951.0016 ↗
11. 10.1002/nme.157310.1002/nme.1573 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmps.2008.06.00210.1016/j.jmps.2008.06.002 ↗
13. Geers MGD, Brekelmans WAM and de Borst R (1994) Viscous Regularization of Strain-Localisation for Damaging Materials. In: Kusters GMA, Hendriks MAN (eds) DIANA Computational Mechanics ‘94. Springer, Dordrecht . Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1046-4_1210.1007/978-94-011-1046-4_12 ↗
14. 10.1098/rsta.1921.000610.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
15. 10.1115/1.344340110.1115/1.3443401 ↗
16. Hellström P, Olander K Analysis and modeling of properties of compacted graphite iron on a microstructural level . Master’s Thesis, Department of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2012.
17. 10.1002/pamm.20121007710.1002/pamm.201210077 ↗
18. Irwin G · 1948
19. Johnson G, Cook W (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proceedings 7th international symposium on ballistics , Hague, Netherlands, April 19–21.
20. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-910.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
21. 10.1002/nme.124610.1002/nme.1246 ↗
22. 10.1002/nme.515210.1002/nme.5152 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2018.09.00110.1016/j.mechmat.2018.09.001 ↗
24. 10.1177/105678951664564410.1177/1056789516645644 ↗
25. Meyers MA · 2009
26. 10.1002/nme.286110.1002/nme.2861 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cma.2014.11.01710.1016/j.cma.2014.11.017 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cma.2014.11.01610.1016/j.cma.2014.11.016 ↗
29. 10.1002/nme.536710.1002/nme.5367 ↗
30. 10.1016/0022-5096(84)90031-010.1016/0022-5096(84)90031-0 ↗
31. 10.1007/s00466-012-0717-710.1007/s00466-012-0717-7 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0022-5096(00)00019-310.1016/S0022-5096(00)00019-3 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.10319710.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103197 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10537510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105375 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0997-7538(03)00070-610.1016/S0997-7538(03)00070-6 ↗
36. 10.1115/1.360120610.1115/1.3601206 ↗
37. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.457.47010.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.457.470 ↗
38. 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
39. 10.1016/S0020-7683(96)00140-010.1016/S0020-7683(96)00140-0 ↗
40. 10.1002/pamm.20131025810.1002/pamm.201310258 ↗