Bilinear damage evolution in AA2011 wire drawing processes
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental and numerical analysis of damage evolution in AA2011 aluminum alloy wires drawn under different scenarios. To this end, load-unload tensile tests were firstly carried out in order to characterize the degradation of the mechanical response in every cycle where the experimental results show a bilinear damage relationship in terms of the effective plastic strain. Therefore, a modification of the classical Lemaitre model is proposed in this work in order to reproduce bilinear paths of damage with the addition of only two parameters that can be directly obtained from the material characterization. Then, the damage predictive capability of this new experimental-based model is assessed in numerical simulations of the drawing process in one and two passes (considering for this last case the sequential and tandem configurations) where the computed predictions are compared with the corresponding experimental data showing a good agreement between them.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departamento de Ingeniería Metalúrgica, Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), Santiago, Chile
Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), Santiago, Chile
Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica y Metalúrgica, Pontificia Universidad Católica, Santiago, Chile
Funding
Departamento de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Universidad de Santiago de Chile · Fondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico · Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0020-7403(03)00051-110.1016/S0020-7403(03)00051-1 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.10.02810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.10.028 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0013-7944(97)00074-X10.1016/S0013-7944(97)00074-X ↗
4. 10.1007/s12289-010-0996-510.1007/s12289-010-0996-5 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00114-610.1016/S0749-6419(02)00114-6 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.03710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.037 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.10.00910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.10.009 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.03.02110.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.03.021 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.03.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2007.03.008 ↗
10. 10.1016/0013-7944(94)00214-310.1016/0013-7944(94)00214-3 ↗
11. 10.1016/0013-7944(87)90108-110.1016/0013-7944(87)90108-1 ↗
12. 10.1016/0013-7944(95)00151-410.1016/0013-7944(95)00151-4 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.08.01410.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.08.014 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.344340110.1115/1.3443401 ↗
15. Kachanov L · Otdelenie Teckhnicheskikh Nauk · 1958 · 8 · 26
16. 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00461-610.1016/S0924-0136(99)00461-6 ↗
17. 10.1177/105678951456180710.1177/1056789514561807 ↗
18. 10.1016/0001-6160(81)90185-110.1016/0001-6160(81)90185-1 ↗
19. 10.1115/1.322577510.1115/1.3225775 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.10.01410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.10.014 ↗
21. 10.1115/1.360120410.1115/1.3601204 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.02410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.024 ↗
23. Orbegozo JI · Annals of the CIRP · 1968 · 16 · 319
24. 10.1243/095440601152065210.1243/0954406011520652 ↗
25. 10.1243/095440601152469410.1243/0954406011524694 ↗
26. 10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-710.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
27. 10.1007/s11831-018-9276-110.1007/s11831-018-9276-1 ↗
28. 10.1016/0013-7944(86)90133-510.1016/0013-7944(86)90133-5 ↗
29. 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
30. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10691810.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106918 ↗
31. 10.1016/0013-7944(91)90172-W10.1016/0013-7944(91)90172-W ↗