Damage-mitigating control of hypersonic flight vehicle based on prescribed performance
Source abstract
Abstract
The goal of damage-mitigating control is to enhance the service life of complex mechanical systems without any significant performance loss. A prescribed performance damage-mitigating controller is designed in this paper to mitigate the damage during longitudinal tracking control of a generic hypersonic flight vehicle. Based on the analysis of stress conditions of wing and construction of damage accumulation model, a hierarchical damage-mitigating controller is designed using prescribed performance which ensures the robustness of performance even after damage-mitigation. Simulation results are presented to show that after damage information feedback, the dynamic performance of the flight is maintained and the damage accumulation is vastly reduced.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Aerospace and Aviation Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Automatic Control, College of Automation Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China
Shipbuilding Technology Research Institute of CSSC, Shanghai, China
Funding
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TNN.2010.207630210.1109/TNN.2010.2076302 ↗
2. 10.1109/TAC.2010.204250810.1109/TAC.2010.2042508 ↗
3. Bermúdez LM, Gladden RD and Jeffries MS (2003) Aerodynamic characterization of the hyper-X launch vehicle. In: Proceedings of 12th international space planes and hypersonics systems and technologies conference , Norfolk, 15–19 December 2003, VI, AIAA Paper 7074: 5.10.2514/6.2003-7074 ↗
4. 10.2514/1.2337010.2514/1.23370 ↗
5. Boller C, Seeger T (1987) Materials Data for Cyclic Loading: Aluminium and Titanium Alloys, New York, NY: Elsevier, pp. 133–135.
6. Boltin VV · 1988
7. 10.1007/978-3-662-53880-7_210.1007/978-3-662-53880-7_2 ↗
8. Jones RM (2009) Deformation Theory of Plasticity, Blacksburg, VA: Bull Ridge Corporation, pp. 146–158.
9. Joyce PJ, Pomroy JB and Grindle L (2005) The hyper-X launch vehicle: Challenges and design considerations for hypersonic flight testing. In: Proceedings of 13th international space planes and hypersonics systems and technologies conference , Capua, Italy, 16–20 May 2005, AIAA Paper 3333, pp. 3–6.10.2514/6.2005-3333 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0005-1098(97)00014-910.1016/S0005-1098(97)00014-9 ↗
11. Lorenzo CF · 1994
12. Lorenzo CF · 1996
13. 10.1177/105678951452407510.1177/1056789514524075 ↗
14. 10.2514/3.4576310.2514/3.45763 ↗
15. Miner MA · Journal of Applied Mechanics · 1945 · 67 · 15910.1115/1.4009458 ↗
16. Newman J · 1992
17. Patil MJ (2003) Nonlinear aeroelastic Analysis of joined-wing aircraft. In: Proceedings of 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference , Norfolk, VI, 7–10 April 2003, AIAA Paper 1487, 2003.10.2514/6.2003-1487 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2004.04.01210.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2004.04.012 ↗
19. 10.1177/105678951562091010.1177/1056789515620910 ↗
20. Ray A · 1996
21. Ray A and Wu MK (1993) Damage-mitigating control of space propulsion systems for high performance and extended life. In: Proceedings of 29th joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Monterey, CA, 28–30 June 1993, AIAA Paper 3052: 3056.10.2514/6.1993-2080 ↗
22. 10.4050/JAHS.42.14910.4050/JAHS.42.149 ↗
23. Walker, Laurence A and William FS (1988) Actuator for a g-limiter override . Patent 4,717,098, USA.
24. Wang Z · Machinery Design and Manufacture · 2009 · 7 · 20
25. 10.2514/1.1259610.2514/1.12596 ↗
26. 10.1007/978-3-642-18943-2_1010.1007/978-3-642-18943-2_10 ↗