A modified closed form energy-based framework for fatigue life assessment for aluminum 6061-T6: Strain range approach
Source abstract
Abstract
It has been shown in our previous effort in the development of an energy-based fatigue life prediction framework that, in order to obtain the fatigue toughness of a nonviscoplastic material at room temperature from the areas of hysteresis loops, a fatigue test need to be conducted at the ideal frequency to minimize the effect of nondamaging energy. For aluminum 6061-T6, the ideal frequency is 0.05 Hz. A fatigue test with such a low frequency requires extensive time to complete. Therefore, the present investigation focuses on modifying the energy-based framework in order to obtain the fatigue toughness from fatigue tests conducted at an arbitrary frequency higher than the ideal frequency. The fatigue toughness is calculated from the average strain range developed in a material during a fatigue test and the Ramberg–Osgood cyclic parameters. The measurement of average strain range by an extensometer associated with a nonviscoplastic test specimen at room temperature is independent of the test frequency. The cyclic parameters are obtained from the fatigue lives at two different stress ranges which are also independent of the test frequency at room temperature. Similar to the case of the previous framework, the modified framework is found to predict the room temperature fatigue life of aluminum 6061-T6 with a promising accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/105678950934308210.1177/1056789509343082 ↗
2. 10.1007/978-94-009-1509-1_210.1007/978-94-009-1509-1_2 ↗
3. Enomoto N · ASTM · 1955 · 55 · 903
4. 10.1115/1.365888410.1115/1.3658884 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.01210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.012 ↗
6. 10.1115/1.183679110.1115/1.1836791 ↗
7. 10.1088/0959-5309/59/2/31110.1088/0959-5309/59/2/311 ↗
8. 10.1080/1478644230863428710.1080/14786442308634287 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01669.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01669.x ↗
10. 10.1007/s11340-010-9365-z10.1007/s11340-010-9365-z ↗
11. Ramberg W, Osgood W (1943) Description of stress-strain curve by three parameters . NACA Technical Note 902 1–29.
12. 10.1243/03093247JSA60210.1243/03093247JSA602 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.294315210.1115/1.2943152 ↗
14. 10.2514/1.3929610.2514/1.39296 ↗
15. Scott-Emuakpor OE · Transactions of the ASME · 2007 · 29 · 162
16. Shen M-HH, Seidt J, George T, et al. (2001) Development of a novel method for evaluating material behavior under turbine engine operating conditions, Part II: An empirical vibration-based fatigue assessment framework. In: Sixth National Turbine Engine High Cycle Fatigue Conference .
17. 10.1016/0029-5493(66)90146-410.1016/0029-5493(66)90146-4 ↗
18. 10.12989/sem.2010.35.6.65910.12989/sem.2010.35.6.659 ↗
19. 10.12989/sem.2010.35.5.57110.12989/sem.2010.35.5.571 ↗
20. Wertz J, Shen M-HH, George T, et al. (2011) An energy-based experimental-analytical torsional fatigue lifeprediction method. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2010: Power for Land, Sea and Air , Vol 6, Structures and Dynamics, Glasgow, UK, 14–18 June.10.1115/GT2010-22647 ↗