Evaluation of aircraft wheel load on pavement damages by layered elastic method
Source abstract
Abstract
As the aircraft industry grows, different aircraft come onto the market which vary in terms of use (e.g., generic, military, commercial, and passenger), geometric shape of the wheels and main gear configuration. In this paper, LEDFAA software was used to investigate the effect of Airbus and Boeing gear configuration on rigid and flexible pavement of runways. Cumulative damage factor defined as the amount of the structural fatigue life of a pavement, which has been accumulated, was calculated for Airbus and Boeing aircraft in this research as well. To validate the numerical analysis in this study, cumulative damage factor curves were drawn using FAARFIELD software. The effect of gear configuration and lateral distance from centerline of runway were also evaluated and critical zones of runway were detected.This paper confirms advisory circular AC150/5320-16 about B-777. This advisory circular canceled airport pavement design in mixed traffic for the Boeing 777 aircraft. In other words, among Airbus group aircraft, A-340-500/600 has the most damage factor contribution on flexible and rigid pavements. This research also presents the structure of the new Federal Aviation Administration program for pavement thickness design. Sample results from the program are presented and compared with the results obtained from the existing Federal Aviation Administration design procedures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Islamic Republic of Iran
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Brill DR (2011) Review of 10 years of concrete airport pavement studies at the NAPTF and next 10 year plan. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on best practices for concrete pavements , Florianopolis, Brazil.
2. Brill DR, Izydor K and Hayhoe GF (2004) Development of FAARFIELD airport pavement design software. In: Transportation systems 2004 workshop . Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA, 28 March–2 April 2004.
3. FAA ORDER 5300.7 (2005) Standard naming convention for aircraft landing gear configurations . U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration.
4. Federal Aviation Administration · 2004
5. Federal Aviation Administration (2004b) Airport pavement design for the Boeing 777 airplane .
6. Garg N (2008) Introduction to FAA’s national airport pavement test facility (NAPTF) workshop-accelerated pavement testing for airport pavements and its impact on pavement design for new generation aircraft. In: Presented to 3rd intl. conf. on APT , Madrid, Spain, 30 September 2008.
7. Godiwalla A and Pokhrel DR (2011) Airport Engineering. In: Houston airport system pavement seminar , Houston, Texas, 14 September 2014.
8. 10.1631/jzus.A072015310.1631/jzus.A0720153 ↗
9. Gopalakrishnan K and Thompson MR (2003) Rutting study of NAPTF flexible pavement test sections. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ASCE airfield specialty conference , Las Vegas, NV.10.1061/40711(141)7 ↗
10. Gopalakrishnan K and Thompson MR (2004) Comparative effect of B777 and B747 trafficking on elastic layer moduli of NAPTF flexible pavements. In: Proceedings of the 2004 FAA Worldwide airport technology transfer conference , Atlantic City, NJ.
11. Guo EH (2010) Concrete pavement strength and beam flexural strength. In: Proceedings of the 2010 FAA Worldwide airport technology transfer conference , Atlantic City, New Jersey, USA.
12. Hao WH and Al-Qadi IL (2010) Effect of high aircraft tire pressure on flexible pavements: Near-surface damage. In: Presented for the FAA Worldwide airport technology transfer conference , Atlantic City, NJ.
13. Hayhoe G · 2004
14. Hayhoe GF (2010) Correspondence between ICAO and overload criteria and cumulative damage factor calculations. In: Proceedings of the 2010 FAA worldwide airport technology transfer conference , Atlantic City, New Jersey, USA.
15. Izydor K, Brill DR and Hayhoe GF (2007) FAARFIELD – New FAA airport thickness design software In: Presented for the FAA worldwide airport technology transfer conference , Atlantic City, New Jersey, USA, April 2007.
16. Joel RN (2006) FAA rigid pavement and tools design philosophy. In: Northwest region airports conference , 10 April 2006.
17. Kawa I, Brill D and Hayhoe GF (2007) FAARFIELD – New FAA airport thickness design software. In: FAA Worldwide airport technology transfer conference , Atlantic City, New Jersey, USA.
18. 10.1177/105678951142458510.1177/1056789511424585 ↗
19. Mojarrad H (2011) Three dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis of airport pavements . PhD Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
20. Shafabakhsh GA · Technics Technologies Education Management TTEM Journal · 2012 · 7 · 811
21. Thompson MR and Garg N (1999) Wheel load interaction: Critical airport pavement responses In: Proceedings of the federal aviation administration airport technology transfer conference , Atlantic City, NJ.
22. Tutumluer E · 2004
23. 10.3141/1577-0310.3141/1577-03 ↗
24. 10.1061/40838(191)210.1061/40838(191)2 ↗