Adaptive cycle jump and limits of degradation in micromechanical fatigue simulations of fibre-reinforced plastics
Source abstract
Abstract
This research investigates the influence of numerical parameters of micromechanical fatigue damage models on the obtained progressive damage behaviour of fibre-reinforced plastics at transverse tensile fatigue loads. The simulated damage behaviour is evaluated using experimentally observed crack patters published in the literature. The investigated numerical model parameters are (1) whether or not the model considers static failure within a simulated load cycle, (2) the degree of material property degradation after sudden failure and (3) the size of the cycle jump. The results reveal a significant influence of the degree of material degradation and of the cycle jump on the simulated matrix crack formation at both higher and lower fatigue loads. Static failure within a simulated load cycle primarily affects the damage behaviour at higher fatigue loads. The paper gives recommendations of the parameter choice for plausible progressive fatigue damage simulation results. Regarding the cycle jump, an adaptive algorithm is proposed and implemented. This approach leads to plausible fatigue damage results paired with a significant reduction of computation time comparing to a cycle-by-cycle analysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Adaptronics and Function Integration, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
Institute for Composite Structures and Adaptive Systems, German Aerospace Center, Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Altenbach H · 1996
2. 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00074-710.1016/0266-3538(96)00074-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00047-410.1016/0266-3538(96)00047-4 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00090-510.1016/S0266-3538(96)00090-5 ↗
5. Bai X · Composites Science and Technology · 2015 · 134 · 23
6. 10.1002/pol.1970.16008060610.1002/pol.1970.160080606 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.006 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.07.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2012.07.017 ↗
9. 10.1115/1.138139510.1115/1.1381395 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00061-X10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00061-X ↗
11. 10.1177/002199830809391110.1177/0021998308093911 ↗
12. 10.1177/105678951562545010.1177/1056789515625450 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.021 ↗
14. Huang Y, Jin K, Xu L, et al. (2011) A micromechanical methodology for fatigue life prediction of polymeric matrix composites. In: 18th international conference on composite materials , August, Jeju Island, Korea.
15. 10.1177/002199831244988610.1177/0021998312449886 ↗
16. Kästner M (2009) Skalenübergreifende modellierung und simulation des mechanischen verhaltens von textilverstärktem polypropylen unter nutzung der XFEM . Dissertation, Technische Universität Dresden.
17. Kästner M, Haasemann G and Ulbricht V (2011) Multiscale XFEM-modelling and simulation of the inelastic material behaviour of textile-reinforced polymers. International Journal for numerical Methods in Engineering 86: 477–489.10.1002/nme.3065 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.10.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2015.10.012 ↗
19. Krause D (2016b) Mikromechanik des ermüdungsverhaltens polymerer verbundwerkstoff. Dissertation, TU Braunschweig.
20. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.09.02310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.09.023 ↗
21. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.784.30810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.784.308 ↗
22. Lesne OM and S Savalle (1989) An efficient cycles jump technique for viscoplastic structure calculations involving large number of cycles. In: DRJ Owen, E Hinton and E Onate (eds) Computational Plasticity Models, Software and Applications, Proceedings of the Second International Conference . Swansea, UK: Pineridge Press. pp.591–602.
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.05.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2006.05.020 ↗
24. 10.1115/1.400945810.1115/1.4009458 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.016 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.06.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2016.06.018 ↗
27. Nesnas K · Revue Européenne des E F · 2000 · 9 · 865
28. 10.1016/0142-1123(82)90001-910.1016/0142-1123(82)90001-9 ↗
29. 10.1177/00219983000340130210.1177/002199830003401302 ↗
30. 10.1177/105678951665192010.1177/1056789516651920 ↗
31. 10.1177/10567895990080040410.1177/105678959900800404 ↗
32. Tan W, Naya F, Yang L, et al. (2017) The role of interfacial properties on the intralaminar and interlaminar damage behaviour of unidirectional composite laminates: experimental characterization and multiscale modelling. Composites Part B: Engineering 138 (October 2017): 206–221.10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.043 ↗
33. 10.1016/S1359-8368(01)00038-510.1016/S1359-8368(01)00038-5 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.05.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2011.05.004 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.013 ↗