journal article·2011-07

Finite Element Analysis of Damage in Ductile Structures Using a Nonlocal Model Combined with a Three-field Formulation

S. Feld-Payet, J. Besson, F. Feyel

Publisher page

Abstract

Solving finite element problems involving elasto-plasticity coupled with damage softening faces two major difficulties: mesh dependence and volumetric locking. In this study, a specific finite element is proposed which allows to solve simultaneously both problems within the small strain framework. It combines a mixed treatment based on a three-field formulation (displacements, assumed pressure, and assumed dilatation) to solve the volumetric locking and a nonlocal implicit gradient-enhanced formulation to avoid localization of damage. Simulations on a double-notched specimen are presented which allow to compare the nonlocal formulation and the mixed nonlocal formulation. Triangular elements with quadratic shape functions for the displacements and linear shape functions for the assumed dilatation, assumed pressure, and nonlocal variable are used. First results show that the mixed nonlocal method regularizes the problem and allows to obtain smoother stress fields than the nonlocal method at the same time.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Fatigue and fracture mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Office National d'Études et de Recherches Aérospatiales (ONERA) BP 72 - 29 Avenue de la Division Leclerc, 92322 Châtillon Cedex, France

Centre des Matériaux, Mines Paris, Paristech, CNRS UMR 7633 BP 87, F-91003, Evry Cedex, France,

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Aero, E.L. · Fizika Tverdogo Tela · 1960 · 2 · 1399
2. 10.1007/BF0216500310.1007/BF02165003 ↗
3. 10.1007/BF0143656110.1007/BF01436561 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.02010.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.020 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:12(1693)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:12(1693) ↗
6. 10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00317-X10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00317-X ↗
7. 10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01124-310.1016/S0045-7825(96)01124-3 ↗
8. Brezzi, F. · Recherche Opérationnelle Analyse Numerique · 1974 · 8 · 129
9. Cosserat, E. · 1909
10. 10.1108/eb02389710.1108/eb023897 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00042-010.1016/S0749-6419(01)00042-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/0020-7225(66)90022-X10.1016/0020-7225(66)90022-X ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.05.01210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.05.012 ↗
14. 10.1080/12506559.2001.1186924610.1080/12506559.2001.11869246 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cma.2007.07.02110.1016/j.cma.2007.07.021 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0241452510.1007/BF02414525 ↗
17. 10.1002/nme.162015091410.1002/nme.1620150914 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cma.2007.12.01510.1016/j.cma.2007.12.015 ↗
19. 10.1016/0045-7825(78)90005-110.1016/0045-7825(78)90005-1 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.10.00710.1016/j.compstruc.2005.10.007 ↗
21. Michel-Ponnelle, S. · 2009
22. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961015)39:19<3391::AID-NME7>3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961015)39:19<3391::AID-NME7>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
23. Pijaudier-Cabot, G. · ASCE · 1987 · 113 · 1512
24. 10.1108/eb02373210.1108/eb023732 ↗
25. 10.1002/andp.1960461031210.1002/andp.19604610312 ↗
26. 10.1016/0045-7825(85)90070-210.1016/0045-7825(85)90070-2 ↗
27. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000110/30)47:1/3<205::AID-NME768>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000110/30)47:1/3<205::AID-NME768>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
28. Truesdell, C.A., III · Flügge’s Handbuch der Physik · 1960 · 3 · 226
29. 10.1016/0045-7949(84)90231-110.1016/0045-7949(84)90231-1 ↗
30. Zienkiewicz, O.C. · 2000
31. Zienkiewicz, O.C. · 2000
32. Zienkiewicz, O.C. · 2005