Influence of Interfacial Bond Strength on Fatigue Life and Thermo-Mechanical Behavior of a Particulate Composite: An Experimental Study
Source abstract
Abstract
Experimental studies conducted on a particular cast acrylic composite demonstrate the significant influence of the interfacial bond strength between filler particles and the polymer matrix on the fatigue life, and mechanical properties. The composite studied in this project is composed of a ductile matrix, which is lightly cross-linked poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) and hard, brittle alumina trihydrate (ATH) agglomerate particle filler. In the study, high, moderate, and low levels of interfacial adhesion between the matrix and the filler are investigated, while all the other material properties are kept constant. Monotonic tension and fatigue tests are conducted at different temperatures. Material degradation is presented in terms of elastic modulus degradation, load-drop parameter, and plastic strain range.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering University at Buffalo, State University of New York, USA,
Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering University at Buffalo, State University of New York, USA
DuPont Surfaces, Yerkes R&D Laboratory Buffalo, NY 14207, USA
Civil Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0022-5096(89)90005-710.1016/0022-5096(89)90005-7 ↗
2. American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics · ASTM D · 1999 · 08 · 638
3. 10.1016/S0167-6636(02)00131-X10.1016/S0167-6636(02)00131-X ↗
4. 10.1177/105678950404105810.1177/1056789504041058 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2003.10.00210.1016/j.mechmat.2003.10.002 ↗
6. Christensen, R.M. · 1979
7. 10.1016/S0167-8442(96)00039-010.1016/S0167-8442(96)00039-0 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.11.02210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.11.022 ↗
9. Hayashi, T. · US Patent · 1990 · 4 · 172
10. Hayashi, T. · US Patent · 1992 · 5 · 279
11. Jones, R.M. · 1999
12. 10.1007/BF0118022110.1007/BF01180221 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00023-810.1016/S0020-7683(00)00023-8 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0093-6413(98)00045-710.1016/S0093-6413(98)00045-7 ↗
15. 10.1115/1.284231110.1115/1.2842311 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1359-8368(98)80002-410.1016/S1359-8368(98)80002-4 ↗
17. 10.1007/978-3-662-02761-510.1007/978-3-662-02761-5 ↗
18. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1985.tb15313.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1985.tb15313.x ↗
19. 10.1023/A:100987312409510.1023/A:1009873124095 ↗
20. 10.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-310.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-3 ↗
21. Moshev, V.V. · Polymer Engineering and Science · 1997 · 37 · 124810.1002/pen.11781 ↗
22. Nie, S. · 2005
23. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.12.00910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.12.009 ↗
24. Oh, H.L. · International Journal of Fracture · 1970 · 6 · 28710.1007/BF00212660 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00161-310.1016/S0266-3538(96)00161-3 ↗
26. Otremba, E.D. · US Patent · 1998 · 5 · 066
27. 10.1016/0020-7683(94)00172-S10.1016/0020-7683(94)00172-S ↗
28. 10.1007/BF0240323410.1007/BF02403234 ↗
29. 10.1115/1.153617110.1115/1.1536171 ↗
30. 10.1023/A:101864892936110.1023/A:1018648929361 ↗
31. 10.1177/00219983970310020110.1177/002199839703100201 ↗
32. 10.1515/JMBM.1999.10.3.13510.1515/JMBM.1999.10.3.135 ↗