journal article·2026-04

A 3D failure criterion for damage assessment in composite T-joints under complex multiaxial stress status

Shakir Hussain Chaudhry, Pu Xue, Ameer S Zirjawi

Publisher page

Abstract

Composite T-joint application as a stiffener is a conjoint aspect in many thin-shell aero-structures; however, these structures are often prone to low-velocity impacts that can drastically reduce their load-carrying capacity. This article implements a new effective approach to determine damage sensitivity and progression. The first part includes a detailed assessment of the three-dimensional (3D) stress status and the result shows that the shear stresses substantially influence the deltoid matrix failure and skin-stiffener debonding. In the second part, a high-fidelity 3D damage model, with a modified damage initiation failure criterion based on Hashin and Puck is implemented via ABAQUS/EXPLICIT VUMAT user-subroutine. The intralaminar damage model considers 3D stress states and continuous stiffness degradation theory while for interlaminar failure, the cohesive-zone method based on bi-linear traction separation law is used. The mechanical response, as well as the intralaminar and interlaminar damage predicted by the model, shows a good correlation with the experimental findings. The results model shows a maximum error of 8% in the case of load versus time and a maximum error of 2.5% in the case of energy absorbed with the experimental results. Overall, the impact behavior of integrated composite structures can be effectively predicted using the recommended method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Northwestern Polytechnical University

Electromechanical Engineering Department, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.024 ↗
2. ASTM D7905/D7905M-19e1:Standard Test Method for Determination of the Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites A. INTERNATIONAL 2019.
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.06910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.069 ↗
4. 10.1201/978100310815310.1201/9781003108153 ↗
5. 10.1016/0021-8928(59)90130-310.1016/0021-8928(59)90130-3 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.08.01510.1016/j.compstruct.2011.08.015 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.09.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2014.09.009 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11583410.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115834 ↗
9. 10.1016/0266-3538(94)90019-110.1016/0266-3538(94)90019-1 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.03310.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.033 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.02.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2010.02.005 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.06.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2010.06.028 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.01510.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.015 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.315366410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
15. 10.1007/978-94-017-1957-510.1007/978-94-017-1957-5 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.03.00410.1016/j.paerosci.2005.03.004 ↗
17. Lemaitre J, Chaboche J-L (1994) Mechanics of solid materials. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
18. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.12.00210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.12.002 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.04310.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.043 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10838910.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108389 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijlmm.2019.10.00110.1016/j.ijlmm.2019.10.001 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.10444810.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104448 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.015 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.02.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2013.02.027 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.016 ↗
26. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-210.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-2 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.02210.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.022 ↗
28. 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00081-X10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00081-X ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.016 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.008 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00140-610.1016/S0266-3538(96)00140-6 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.05.02410.1016/j.compositesb.2014.05.024 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.07.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2016.07.009 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.020 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.03.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2014.03.052 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.03910.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.039 ↗
37. Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites A. INTERNATIONAL 2022.
38. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.06.00810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.06.008 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.02510.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.025 ↗
40. 10.1061/JAEEEZ.ASENG-489010.1061/JAEEEZ.ASENG-4890 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11471410.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114714 ↗
42. 10.1177/002199831347716910.1177/0021998313477169 ↗
43. 10.1177/002199831246071310.1177/0021998312460713 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10987510.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109875 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11111310.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111113 ↗