An anisotropic, brittle damage model for finite strains with a generic damage tensor regularization
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper establishes a generic framework for the nonlocal modeling of anisotropic damage at finite strains. By the combination of two recent works, the new framework allows for the flexible incorporation of different established hyperelastic finite strain material formulations into anisotropic damage whilst ensuring mesh-independent results by employing a generic set of micromorphic gradient-extensions. First, the anisotropic damage model, generally satisfying the damage growth criterion, is investigated for the specific choice of a neo-Hookean material on a single element. Next, the model is applied with different gradient-extensions in structural simulations of an asymmetrically notched specimen to identify an efficient choice in the form of a volumetric–deviatoric regularization. Thereafter, the generic framework, which is without loss of generality here specified for a neo-Hookean material with a volumetric–deviatoric gradient-extension, successfully serves for the complex simulation of a pressure-loaded rotor blade. The codes of the material subroutines are accessible to the public at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11171630 .
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Elasticity and Material Modeling · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Numerical methods in engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Applied Mechanics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00466-020-01939-610.1007/s00466-020-01939-6 ↗
2. Ahrens J Geveci B Law C (2005) ParaView: An end-user tool for large data visualization. In: Visualization handbook. Elsevier.10.1016/B978-012387582-2/50038-1 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00466-015-1225-310.1007/s00466-015-1225-3 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cma.2020.11344010.1016/j.cma.2020.113440 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cma.2021.11388410.1016/j.cma.2021.113884 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cma.2021.11431710.1016/j.cma.2021.114317 ↗
7. Basaran C (2023) Introduction to Unified Mechanics Theory With Applications. Cham: Springer.
8. 10.1177/105678950910348210.1177/1056789509103482 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.05.01010.1016/j.ijplas.2017.05.010 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.11.01410.1016/j.ijplas.2019.11.014 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.01.00210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.01.002 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cma.2021.11412310.1016/j.cma.2021.114123 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cma.2019.03.05110.1016/j.cma.2019.03.051 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.02.00910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.02.009 ↗
15. 10.1177/1056789522109130610.1177/10567895221091306 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:3(117)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:3(117) ↗
17. 10.1098/rspa.2015.075510.1098/rspa.2015.0755 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.10494610.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.104946 ↗
19. 10.1177/1056789521101906510.1177/10567895211019065 ↗
20. 10.1177/1056789523115172610.1177/10567895231151726 ↗
21. 10.1177/1056789523119723710.1177/10567895231197237 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10264210.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102642 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmps.2022.10483310.1016/j.jmps.2022.104833 ↗
24. Holthusen H Brepols T Simon J-W et al. . (2022b) A gradient-extended anisotropic damage-plasticity model in the logarithmic strain space. In: ECCOMAS Congress 2022–8th European Congress on computational methods in applied sciences and engineering Oslo Norway June 5–9 2022 pp.1–12. Barcelona: Scipedia.
25. 10.1016/j.cma.2024.11706310.1016/j.cma.2024.117063 ↗
26. Holzapfel GA (2000) Nonlinear Solid Mechanics: A Continuum Approach for Engineering. West Sussex: Wiley.
27. HyperWorks (2022) Hypermesh. Altair Engineering Inc. Available at: https://altairhyperworks.com/product/HyperMesh.
28. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.06.01110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.06.011 ↗
29. Lemaitre J, Desmorat R (2005) Engineering Damage Mechanics: Ductile, Creep, Fatigue and Brittle Failures. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
30. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10966910.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109669 ↗
31. 10.1177/105678952094856310.1177/1056789520948563 ↗
32. 10.1007/978-94-007-2666-610.1007/978-94-007-2666-6 ↗
33. 10.1007/s10659-015-9524-710.1007/s10659-015-9524-7 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.finmec.2023.10022410.1016/j.finmec.2023.100224 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmps.2020.10417410.1016/j.jmps.2020.104174 ↗
36. 10.1177/1056789522111545910.1177/10567895221115459 ↗
37. 10.1177/1056789523117253710.1177/10567895231172537 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.cma.2023.11628410.1016/j.cma.2023.116284 ↗
39. 10.1007/s00419-012-0610-z10.1007/s00419-012-0610-z ↗
40. Taylor RL Govindjee S (2020) FEAP – a finite element analysis program. University of California Berkeley. Available at: http://projects.ce.berkeley.edu/feap/manual_86.pdf.
41. 10.1002/nme.758010.1002/nme.7580 ↗
42. 10.1002/nme.719010.1002/nme.7190 ↗
43. 10.1177/105678950809754610.1177/1056789508097546 ↗
44. 10.1007/s00707-017-1836-110.1007/s00707-017-1836-1 ↗
45. Voyiadjis GZ, Kattan PI (2024) A new unsymmetrical decomposition of the damage variable. International Journal of Damage Mechanics 10567895241245501. Epub ahead of print.
46. 10.1177/1056789522110565410.1177/10567895221105654 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.04.03810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.04.038 ↗
48. 10.1177/1056789524123558110.1177/10567895241235581 ↗
49. 10.1177/1056789522110962210.1177/10567895221109622 ↗
50. 10.1177/1056789522111492610.1177/10567895221114926 ↗