Informing a damage model for fracture of concrete from lattice discrete particle model results
Source abstract
Abstract
Lattice modeling of quasi-brittle materials, such as concrete, is a discrete mesoscale description of a material, where constitutive relations are defined at a lower scale compared to the continuum-based approaches. Over the years, these lattice discrete models have become increasingly efficient, and they are expected to be useful for generating high-fidelity databases of complex material responses. Such databases can be exploited in two ways: either to inform data-driven approaches or to calibrate macroscale models. In this paper, we focus on the latter. Macroscopic stress and strain responses are obtained by coarse-graining lattice discrete particle model (LDPM) responses. Stresses and strains are coarse-grained independently from computations on bending beams. Local and nonlocal scalar damage models are used to fit these data. The evolution of damage is constructed from these stress–strain responses by computing the pairs composed of damage and the history variable that govern its growth. Model parameters in the nonlocal model, including the internal length, are then obtained by fitting the macroscale constitutive model to the coarse-grained results. The global response of the bending beam (load vs. displacement) and the energy dissipation profiles provided by the calibrated nonlocal damage model are found to be consistent with LDPM results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Universite de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, CNRS, LFCR
Northwestern University
Funding
Agence Nationale de la Recherche · HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions · Communauté d'agglomération Pau-Béarn-Pyrennées
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.10.00710.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.10.007 ↗
2. Bažant ZP, Oh BH (1983) Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. Materials and Structures 16: 155–177.
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:4(755)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:4(755) ↗
4. 10.1115/1.405422110.1115/1.4054221 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10803010.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108030 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000057010.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000570 ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:12(1439)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:12(1439) ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:12(1449)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:12(1449) ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.01010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.010 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.01110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.011 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.09.01210.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.09.012 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmps.2020.10420410.1016/j.jmps.2020.104204 ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000148010.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001480 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0085210.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00852 ↗
15. Fichant S, La Borderie C, Pijaudier-Cabot G (1999) Isotropic and anisotropic descriptions of damage in concrete structures. Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials: An International Journal on Experiments, Modelling and Computation of Materials and Structures 4(4): 339–359.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199907)4:4<339::AID-CFM65>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
16. 10.1140/epje/i2002-10073-510.1140/epje/i2002-10073-5 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.03.02310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.03.023 ↗
18. 10.1002/nag.218010.1002/nag.2180 ↗
19. 10.1002/nag.236310.1002/nag.2363 ↗
20. Haidar K, Pijaudier-Cabot G, Dubé JF, et al. (2005) Correlation between the internal length, the fracture process zone and size effect in model materials. Materials and Structures 38: 201–210.
21. 10.1115/1.404898910.1115/1.4048989 ↗
22. 10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-710.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
23. 10.14359/5168716610.14359/51687166 ↗
24. La Borderie C (2003) Stratégies et modèles de calculs pour les structures en béton. Habilitation à diriger des recherches. France: Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour.
25. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.04.04310.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.04.043 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0997-7538(02)01255-X10.1016/S0997-7538(02)01255-X ↗
27. Li W Jin C Salviato M et al. (2015) Modeling of failure behavior of anisotropic shale using lattice discrete particle model. In: ARMA US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium ARMA 2015.
28. 10.1007/s00603-018-1625-810.1007/s00603-018-1625-8 ↗
29. 10.1016/0013-7944(86)90036-610.1016/0013-7944(86)90036-6 ↗
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:2(345)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:2(345) ↗
31. 10.1177/105678951775021310.1177/1056789517750213 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.10373810.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103738 ↗
33. Pathirage M, Zhang B, Alnaggar M, et al. (2023b) Confinement and alkali-silica reaction in concrete: Review and numerical investigation. International Journal of Solids and Structures 277: 112341.
34. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961015)39:19<3391::AID-NME7>3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961015)39:19<3391::AID-NME7>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:10(1512)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:10(1512) ↗
36. Pijaudier-Cabot G Khoury J (2024) Damage mechanics for quasi-brittle materials: Continuum and lattice descriptions. In: Silberschmidt V (ed.) Comprehensive Mechanics of Materials vol. 1. Oxford: Elsevier pp.303–324.10.1016/B978-0-323-90646-3.00036-8 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jmps.2016.01.00110.1016/j.jmps.2016.01.001 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12353210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123532 ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000038710.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000387 ↗
40. 10.1002/nag.255510.1002/nag.2555 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.08.00510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.08.005 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cma.2025.11818310.1016/j.cma.2025.118183 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12898510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128985 ↗