journal article·2026-03

Measuring damage anisotropy in concrete from ultrasound velocity data

Alexis Fedoroff, Kim Calonius, Anna Sklodowska

Publisher page

Abstract

The uniaxial compression of an initially isotropic concrete specimen induces a damage pattern that is anisotropic: in the direction of loading, the concrete undergoes compaction, while in the directions orthogonal to the loading direction, concrete cracking can be observed. In order to quantify such damage patterns, one possibility is to observe the changes in the stiffness tensor of a compressed specimen with respect to the stiffness tensor of the corresponding virgin state specimen. The eigensolutions of the Kelvin–Christoffel matrix for anisotropic media provide the relation between ultrasound wave velocities in given wavefront and polarization directions and the stiffness matrix components. In this study, it is shown how using the through transmission method for the determination of first-time arrival, one can evaluate the sound wave velocities in different directions and compute the stiffness tensor components for a damaged concrete specimen. Plots of stiffness tensor components as a function of non-recoverable strain give a qualitative measure of the anisotropic strain degradation process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Geophysical Methods and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Structural Integrity for Nuclear Safety, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Kemistintie 3, Espoo, Finland

Non-Destructive Testing Methods for Civil Engineering, BAM Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung, Berlin, Germany

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0040-1951(78)90099-910.1016/0040-1951(78)90099-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13287610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132876 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.03.00610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.03.006 ↗
4. ASTM (2022) Standard Test Method for Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Through Concrete. ASTM.
5. 10.1115/1.290144610.1115/1.2901446 ↗
6. Azar L (1998) Ultrasonic Phased Arrays for the Condition Assessment of Concrete Structures. PhD Thesis Massachusetts Institute of Technology.10.1007/978-1-4615-4791-4_276 ↗
7. Basista M (2003) Micromechanics of damage in brittle solids. In: Skrzypek JJ and Ganczarski AW (eds) Anisotropic Behaviour of Damaged Materials. Berlin: Springer pp.221–258.10.1007/978-3-540-36418-4_7 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0167-6636(98)00003-910.1016/S0167-6636(98)00003-9 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ultras.2021.10647210.1016/j.ultras.2021.106472 ↗
10. Brown RJ (1989) Relationships between the velocities and the elastic constants of an anisotropic solid possessing orthorhombic symmetry. CREWES project.
11. CEN (2021) Testing concrete in structures – Part 4: Determination of ultrasonic pulse velocity. Standard CEN/TC 104 – Concrete (performance production placing and compliance criteria).
12. 10.1190/1.144297110.1190/1.1442971 ↗
13. 10.1080/09349847.2020.179725510.1080/09349847.2020.1797255 ↗
14. de Araujo Thomaz W, Miyaji DY, Possan E (2021) Comparative study of dynamic and static Young’s modulus of concrete containing basaltic aggregates. Case Studies in Construction Materials 15: e00645.
15. 10.18517/ijaseit.12.4.1651810.18517/ijaseit.12.4.16518 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.12.01110.1016/j.cemconres.2003.12.011 ↗
17. 10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-710.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.09.00510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.09.005 ↗
19. 10.1177/105678951247384910.1177/1056789512473849 ↗
20. 10.2298/TAM170306018J10.2298/TAM170306018J ↗
21. Kendall K (1978) Complexities of compression failure. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 361(1705): 245–263 .
22. 10.1016/0958-9465(96)00026-110.1016/0958-9465(96)00026-1 ↗
23. 10.1115/1.289718610.1115/1.2897186 ↗
24. Lee J, Fenves GL (1977) Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 124(8): 527–535.
25. Lee YH, Oh T (2016) The measurement of p-, s-, and r-wave velocities to evaluate the condition of reinforced and prestressed concrete slabs. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering 2016(1): 1548215.
26. Litewka A Bogucka J Debinski J (2003) Anisotropic behaviour of damaged concrete and fiber reinforced concrete. In: Skrzypek JJ and Ganczarski AW (eds) Anisotropic Behaviour of Damaged Materials Berlin: Springer pp.185–219.10.1007/978-3-540-36418-4_6 ↗
27. 10.3390/ma1220329510.3390/ma12203295 ↗
28. 10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-410.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4 ↗
29. 10.1016/0020-7683(96)00015-710.1016/0020-7683(96)00015-7 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.09610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.096 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.00710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.007 ↗
32. Ottosen N (1977) A failure criterion for concrete. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 103(4): 527–535.
33. Pertsch AT (2009) An intelligent stand-alone ultrasonic device for monitoring local damage growth in civil structures. PhD Thesis Georgia Institute of Technology.10.1063/1.3362292 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.336229210.1063/1.3362292 ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0247267610.1007/BF02472676 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.00910.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.009 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.03.02010.1016/j.matdes.2010.03.020 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.06910.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.069 ↗
39. Shokouhi P, Zoëga A, Wiggenhauser H (2010) Nondestructive investigation of stress-induced damage in concrete. Advances in Civil Engineering 2010(1): 740189.
40. 10.1029/2019JB01757710.1029/2019JB017577 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2003.05.00110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2003.05.001 ↗
42. 10.1121/1.191044310.1121/1.1910443 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.11104810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111048 ↗
44. 10.1139/p99-05910.1139/p99-059 ↗