journal article·2025-08

Experimental and theoretical model study on grouting reinforcement effect of fractured rock mass

Hui Wang, Hairong Yu, Xiaotong Zhang, Hongyu Zhuo, Jitao Jia, Haosong Wang, Hongyuan Huai

Publisher page

Abstract

The mechanical properties of fractured rock mass have an important influence on the safety and stability of underground engineering. Grouting is a common way to reinforce fractured rock mass. The uniaxial compression tests of red sandstone specimens with different prefabricated crack inclination angles before and after grouting were carried out. Based on the load-deformation data and synchronous image acquisition, the mechanical properties, crack propagation law and failure mode of the specimens before and after grouting were studied. The results show that the peak strength and elastic modulus of the ungrouted specimen increase with the increase of the inclination angle of the prefabricated crack. Compared with the ungrouted specimen, grouting can significantly improve the peak strength and elastic modulus of the specimen. The cracks of the ungrouted specimen mainly initiate from the tip of the prefabricated crack, and the cracks of the grouting specimen mainly initiate from the upper and lower surfaces of the specimen and the far field. Based on the macroscopic and microscopic damage theory, the constitutive model of grouting rock mass is proposed. By comparing with the experimental data, the rationality of the constitutive model is verified.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Geomechanics and Mining Engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shandong University of Science and Technology, Taian, China

Funding

the Quality Improvement Program for Postgraduate Education in Shandong Province · the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province · the Excellent Youth Innovation Team Program of Shandong Province Universities

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.03.01810.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.03.018 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.10527410.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105274 ↗
3. Chen YJ, Jing Y, Yin YC, et al. (2020b) Influence of “X” fracture, confining pressure, and temperature on rock masses’ failure process. Advances in Civil Engineering 1072161 2020(1)
4. 10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-883910.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-8839 ↗
5. 10.3390/su1212518810.3390/su12125188 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0695110.1021/acsomega.2c06951 ↗
7. 10.1177/1056789521101906710.1177/10567895211019067 ↗
8. 10.1177/1056789523119723710.1177/10567895231197237 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.12.00510.1016/j.jrmge.2018.12.005 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00603-014-0643-410.1007/s00603-014-0643-4 ↗
11. 10.13168/AGG.2014.000610.13168/AGG.2014.0006 ↗
12. 10.1002/nag.161012010210.1002/nag.1610120102 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.10461810.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104618 ↗
14. Liang GX (2018) Statistical damage constitutive model and energy dissipation of rock in high stress area. Nonferrous Metals (Mine Section) 70(06): 89–94. +109.
15. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.10235810.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102358 ↗
16. 10.3390/en1318481410.3390/en13184814 ↗
17. 10.3390/ma1613485910.3390/ma16134859 ↗
18. 10.1002/nag.290810.1002/nag.2908 ↗
19. 10.1007/s12517-013-0920-710.1007/s12517-013-0920-7 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.10.00510.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.10.005 ↗
21. 10.1002/zamm.1929009010410.1002/zamm.19290090104 ↗
22. 10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-936610.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-9366 ↗
23. 10.1177/1056789522112309010.1177/10567895221123090 ↗
24. Sun WJ, Zhou WH (1990) Elastic-plastic-damage constitutive model of fractured rock mass. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering 9(02): 108–119.
25. 10.1177/1056789522112309210.1177/10567895221123092 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10316710.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103167 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tust.2020.10338210.1016/j.tust.2020.103382 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.10474310.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104743 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000141610.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001416 ↗
30. 10.1371/journal.pone.022064310.1371/journal.pone.0220643 ↗
31. 10.1177/1056789521101906810.1177/10567895211019068 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10306010.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103060 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10267410.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102674 ↗
34. 10.1007/s11771-018-3821-910.1007/s11771-018-3821-9 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.06.01310.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.06.013 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10784310.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107843 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.09.00810.1016/j.jrmge.2021.09.008 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.10742310.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107423 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10704-010-9576-410.1007/s10704-010-9576-4 ↗
40. 10.1007/s12205-015-1663-710.1007/s12205-015-1663-7 ↗
41. 10.3389/feart.2022.101971610.3389/feart.2022.1019716 ↗
42. 10.3389/feart.2022.97705410.3389/feart.2022.977054 ↗
43. 10.1007/s13146-016-0332-310.1007/s13146-016-0332-3 ↗
44. 10.1002/nag.300310.1002/nag.3003 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10682210.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106822 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.04.00410.1016/j.tafmec.2014.04.004 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.12.00410.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.12.004 ↗
48. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.250-253.152010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.250-253.1520 ↗