journal article·2025-05Open access

Effect of printing direction on fatigue response and damage development in additive manufactured Haynes 282 nickel superalloy

Mateusz Kopec, Xiaochuan Liu, Dominik Kukla, Ryszard Sitek, Zbigniew L Kowalewski

Abstract

In this paper, three different directions of 0°, 45° and 90° were used to manufacture the Haynes 282 alloy bars by using the Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) method. The additively manufactured specimens as well as these of the wrought Haynes 282 were subsequently subjected to comparative fatigue tests in the range of stress amplitude from ±400 MPa to ±800 MPa. The AM process enhanced the fatigue response of the nickel-based alloy in question by 200 MPa. Furthermore, it was found, that the printing direction does not affect the fatigue response of additively manufactured specimens significantly as minor differences in service life were observed for the entire stress amplitude range adopted. Finally, fatigue damage measure φ and fatigue damage parameter D approaches were used to reveal the dynamics of damage development and to monitor damage development due to fatigue.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · High Entropy Alloys Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China

Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11665-019-03980-w10.1007/s11665-019-03980-w ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10972510.1016/j.matdes.2021.109725 ↗
3. 10.1063/5.003540010.1063/5.0035400 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16557210.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165572 ↗
5. 10.3390/met1005062910.3390/met10050629 ↗
6. 10.3390/ma1418540810.3390/ma14185408 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.10385910.1016/j.mechmat.2021.103859 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14223410.1016/j.msea.2021.142234 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matchar.2021.11155810.1016/j.matchar.2021.111558 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10338-023-00387-y10.1007/s10338-023-00387-y ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.10428210.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104282 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10108310.1016/j.addma.2020.101083 ↗
13. 10.4149/km_2014_5_26910.4149/km_2014_5_269 ↗
14. 10.1177/105678951989176510.1177/1056789519891765 ↗
15. 10.1177/105678951983105010.1177/1056789519831050 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.07510.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.075 ↗
17. 10.1177/105678951983588110.1177/1056789519835881 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10559810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105598 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10965610.1016/j.matdes.2021.109656 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.01.10110.1016/j.msea.2019.01.101 ↗
21. 10.1177/105678951878922110.1177/1056789518789221 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10809510.1016/j.matdes.2019.108095 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msea.2022.14278510.1016/j.msea.2022.142785 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10203810.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102038 ↗
25. 10.1177/1056789522108220910.1177/10567895221082209 ↗
26. 10.3390/ma1521754510.3390/ma15217545 ↗
27. 10.1002/mdp2.8410.1002/mdp2.84 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.13860710.1016/j.msea.2019.138607 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.04.04910.1016/j.jmst.2021.04.049 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14209910.1016/j.msea.2021.142099 ↗
31. 10.1007/s00707-019-02508-610.1007/s00707-019-02508-6 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.11759710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117597 ↗
33. 10.1177/105678951773713210.1177/1056789517737132 ↗