journal article·2024-02

A novel meso-damage constitutive model of rock under true triaxial stress with three-dimensional cracking strength, threshold and closure effect

Zhi Zheng, Jiaju Zhou, Junhong Li, Honghui Tao, Xiaofeng Han, Hongyu Xu, Qiang Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

Deep underground engineering is in a true three-dimensional stress state, and the adjustment of the three-dimensional stress state caused by engineering excavation will induce the fracture or even instability of the surrounding rock. However, three-dimensional mechanical model research suitable for the stability analysis of deep surrounding rock is very scarce. Therefore, a series of tests under different true triaxial stresses on two rocks (rhyodacite and marble) were conducted, and the characteristic strength (crack stable propagation initiation stress, crack unstable propagation initiation stress and peak strength) and deformation characteristics were further analyzed. After that, using the Lemaitre strain equivalence hypothesis and rock statistical damage theory, a new statistical damage constitutive model at true triaxial stress states was proposed, which introduced the three-dimensional strength criterion Modified Wiebols Cook to characterize the three-dimensional strength of the rock microelement. Therefore, the intermediate principal stress can be reasonably considered. The damage threshold, initial compaction effect and residual strength of the rock microelement at different true triaxial stress conditions were also considered. Then the relationships between the proposed model parameters and σ 2 and σ 3 were analyzed. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis of the influence of parameters m and F 0 in proposed model on the shape of rock stress–strain curve and peak strength was also investigated. The comparison between the results predicted by proposed model and the experimental data shows that the new model established in this study can well simulate the prepeak and postpeak deformation characteristics of rock and the intermediate principal stress effect under true triaxial stress conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Landslides and related hazards · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Engineering Safety, College of Civil engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning, China

Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area (China Three Gorges University) Ministry of Education, Yichang, China

State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, China

Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, China

China Energy Engineering Group Guangxi Electric Power Design Institute, Nanning, China

PowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited (HDEC), Hangzhou, China

Funding

CRSRI Open Research Program · Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin · Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province · Chinese Postdoctoral Science Fund Project · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Plan of Guangxi University · Guangxi Science and Technology Project

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0032-0633(96)00025-610.1016/0032-0633(96)00025-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.03.00510.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.03.005 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.10.00310.1016/j.jrmge.2018.10.003 ↗
4. Cao WG · Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology · 2005 · 32 · 11
5. Cao WG · Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering · 2005 · 24 · 2403
6. 10.1177/105678952092372010.1177/1056789520923720 ↗
7. 10.1007/s12665-018-7297-610.1007/s12665-018-7297-6 ↗
8. 10.3390/sym1101004110.3390/sym11010041 ↗
9. 10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00048-510.1016/S1365-1609(02)00048-5 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.10683710.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106837 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cageo.2010.05.01810.1016/j.cageo.2010.05.018 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.09.00610.1016/j.jrmge.2018.09.006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.12.00310.1016/j.jrmge.2021.12.003 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.10.00610.1016/j.enggeo.2004.10.006 ↗
15. 10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00051-510.1016/S1365-1609(02)00051-5 ↗
16. 10.1680/geot.2003.53.3.32710.1680/geot.2003.53.3.327 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.10702010.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107020 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00603-020-02272-310.1007/s00603-020-02272-3 ↗
19. Hu B · International Journal of Geosciences · 2020 · 20 · 06019018
20. 10.1016/0029-5493(84)90169-910.1016/0029-5493(84)90169-9 ↗
21. 10.1016/0020-7683(89)90015-210.1016/0020-7683(89)90015-2 ↗
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:12(2764)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:12(2764) ↗
23. 10.1177/1056789522114380610.1177/10567895221143806 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.09.01710.1016/j.prostr.2018.09.017 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00603-014-0545-510.1007/s00603-014-0545-5 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.05.00710.1016/j.jrmge.2021.05.007 ↗
27. 10.1016/0020-7683(82)90039-710.1016/0020-7683(82)90039-7 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.10593410.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105934 ↗
29. 10.3389/feart.2022.83886210.3389/feart.2022.838862 ↗
30. 10.1016/0029-5493(84)90169-910.1016/0029-5493(84)90169-9 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.10372110.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103721 ↗
32. 10.1177/105678951668537910.1177/1056789516685379 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00603-018-1414-410.1007/s00603-018-1414-4 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2019.07.01810.1016/j.enganabound.2019.07.018 ↗
35. 10.1007/s13369-015-1777-810.1007/s13369-015-1777-8 ↗
36. 10.1007/s00603-022-03058-510.1007/s00603-022-03058-5 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00247-810.1016/S0013-7952(02)00247-8 ↗
38. 10.1002/nag.330310.1002/nag.3303 ↗
39. 10.1007/s11440-022-01752-w10.1007/s11440-022-01752-w ↗
40. 10.1177/1056789521104543010.1177/10567895211045430 ↗
41. 10.1177/105678951877907010.1177/1056789518779070 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0013-7952(97)00051-310.1016/S0013-7952(97)00051-3 ↗
43. 10.1177/1056789521101906810.1177/10567895211019068 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cageo.2006.02.01110.1016/j.cageo.2006.02.011 ↗
45. 10.1016/0148-9062(68)90040-510.1016/0148-9062(68)90040-5 ↗
46. 10.1007/s40948-022-00358-610.1007/s40948-022-00358-6 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijmst.2022.05.00610.1016/j.ijmst.2022.05.006 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.10454810.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104548 ↗
49. 10.1177/105678951990077810.1177/1056789519900778 ↗
50. 10.1016/0098-3004(94)90068-X10.1016/0098-3004(94)90068-X ↗
51. 10.1007/s00603-018-1659-y10.1007/s00603-018-1659-y ↗
52. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.10544410.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105444 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.10505610.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105056 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.11263610.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112636 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.10378510.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103785 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.apm.2022.09.01210.1016/j.apm.2022.09.012 ↗
57. 10.1177/1056789522108399710.1177/10567895221083997 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.10513610.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105136 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10566510.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105665 ↗
60. 10.1177/1056789521101122510.1177/10567895211011225 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.07.01210.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.07.012 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.10498410.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104984 ↗