journal article·2018-04

Effect of fragment dispersion on damage assessment of a directional fragment generator

KD Dhote, RS Deodhar

Publisher page

Abstract

Effective neutralisation of an offensive target missile can be accomplished by a defensive missile system carrying a potential kill mechanism. A directional fragment generator warhead is one of the kill mechanisms for such an application. It projects fragments in a designed beam angle. Few researchers have attempted to quantify fragment dispersion on explosion, which revealed that the fragment projection angle follows a normal distribution with wide range in standard deviation value of 0.75° and 3°. In this paper, an attempt has been made to analyse the importance of knowing the standard deviation value for assessing damage in terms of fragment hit density and kill probability. By altering the standard deviation value between 0 and 3°, the fragment spray distribution for the fragment generator warhead is generated and compared with the distribution that corresponds to a standard deviation value of 0.75°. It is observed that the hit density variation varies by −51% to 40% from the actual. On comparing the effect of standard deviation on kill probability, it is observed that it depends on the proportionate area of vulnerable component in the fragment beam. For the vulnerable area of 0.5 times (50%) of annular fragment beam area, more than or equal to eight fragments can achieve kill probability close to 1. However, for vulnerable area of 0.02 (2%) and 0.1 times (10%) of annular fragment beam area, the kill probability depends on standard deviation value.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Nuclear Issues and Defense · Energetic Materials and Combustion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Armament Research and Development Establishment (ARDE), Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), Pune, India

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/105678951348247910.1177/1056789513482479 ↗
2. Anon · 1964
3. Arnold W and Rottenkolberg E (2008) Lethality enhancer against TBMs with demanding submunition payloads. In: Proceedings of the 24th international symposium on ballistics, New Orleans, LA, 22–26 September 2008.
4. 10.1016/B978-075067618-2/50009-310.1016/B978-075067618-2/50009-3 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.dt.2014.05.00110.1016/j.dt.2014.05.001 ↗
6. Dhote KD · Central European Journal of Energetic Materials · 2015 · 12 · 637
7. 10.22211/cejem/6497110.22211/cejem/64971 ↗
8. Driels MR · 2004
9. Hartmann M (2009) Component Kill Criteria a Literature Review . FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency. Available at: www.foi.se/ReportFiles/foir_2829.pdf (assessed 20 January 2016).
10. Hartmann MG · Journal of Battlefield Technology · 2010 · 13 · 13
11. Hartmann MG · Journal of Battlefield Technology · 2012 · 15 · 1
12. 10.1002/prep.1988013050310.1002/prep.19880130503 ↗
13. Kennedy RD · 1993 · 155 · 1
14. 10.1002/1521-4087(200211)27:5<267::AID-PREP267>3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/1521-4087(200211)27:5<267::AID-PREP267>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
15. Lloyd RM and Arnold W (1999) Kinetic energy rod warhead against TBM submunition targets. In: Proceedings of the 18th international symposium on ballistics, San Antonio, TX, 15–19 November 1999.
16. 10.2514/4.47255810.2514/4.472558 ↗
17. Lloyd RM · 2001 · 194
18. Moon S · Journal of Battlefield Technology · 2014 · 17 · 1
19. 10.2514/4.47385210.2514/4.473852 ↗