A continuum model for concrete informed by mesoscale studies
Source abstract
Abstract
The paper describes a novel computational approach to refine continuum models for penetration calculations which involves two stages. At the first stage, a trial continuum model is used to model penetration into a concrete target. Model parameters are chosen to match experimental data on penetration depth. Deformation histories are recorded at few locations in the target around the penetrator. In the second stage, these histories are applied to the boundaries of a representative volume comparable to the element size in large scale penetration simulation. Discrete-continuum approach is used to model the deformation and failure of the material within the representative volume. The same deformation histories are applied to a single element which uses the model to be improved. Continuum model may include multiple parameters or functions which cannot be easily found using experimental data. We propose using mesoscale response to constrain such parameters and functions. Such tuning of the continuum model using typical deformation histories experienced by the target material during the penetration allows us to minimize the parameter space and build better models for penetration problems which are based on physics of penetration rather than intuition and ad hoc assumptions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Antoun T, Vorobiev E and Johnson S (2012) Mesoscale modeling of the dynamic response of armor ceramics. Advances in Ceramic Armor VIII: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings 573: 3.10.1002/9781118217498.ch1 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00211-710.1016/S0020-7683(03)00211-7 ↗
3. 10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.v8.i1.5010.1615/IntJMultCompEng.v8.i1.50 ↗
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:3(381)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:3(381) ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:9(944)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:9(944) ↗
6. 10.1177/105678951452164710.1177/1056789514521647 ↗
7. Blacker TD, Bohnhoff WJ and Edwards TL (1994) Cubit mesh generation environment. Volume 1: Users manual. Technical report, Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM.10.2172/10176386 ↗
8. Brannon RM and Fossum AF (2004) The sandia geomodel: theory and user’s guide . Technical report, Sandia National Laboratories.10.2172/919182 ↗
9. Carol I · Revue Européenne de Génie Civil · 2007 · 11 · 907
10. 10.1002/nme.162035030710.1002/nme.1620350307 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00603-009-0027-310.1007/s00603-009-0027-3 ↗
12. 10.1002/nme.27610.1002/nme.276 ↗
13. Hurley R · Computational Mechanics · 2017 · 1
14. Johnson G, Beissel S, Holmquist T, et al. Computed radial stresses in a concrete target penetrated by a steel projectile. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on structures under shock and impact , Thesaloniki, Greece, 24–26 June 1998, pp. 793–806.
15. Kupfer HB · Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division · 1973 · 99 · 85310.1061/JMCEA3.0001789 ↗
16. 10.1177/105678951558683910.1177/1056789515586839 ↗
17. 10.1617/s11527-007-9314-110.1617/s11527-007-9314-1 ↗
18. 10.1617/s11527-007-9312-310.1617/s11527-007-9312-3 ↗
19. Malvar L, Crawford J and Morrill K (2000) K&c concrete material model release iii – Automated generation of material model input. Karagozian and Case Structural Engineers, Technical Report TR-99-243 .
20. 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90069-210.1016/0045-7825(88)90069-2 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.05610.1016/j.cma.2003.12.056 ↗
22. 10.1002/nme.96410.1002/nme.964 ↗
23. 10.1038/nature0233310.1038/nature02333 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-1-4419-0727-1_910.1007/978-1-4419-0727-1_9 ↗
25. Riedel W, Thoma K, Hiermaier S, et al. Penetration of reinforced concrete by beta-b-500 numerical analysis using a new macroscopic concrete model for hydrocodes. In: Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on the effects of munitions with structures , Berlin-Strausberg, 3–7 May 1999.
26. 10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00333-310.1016/S0020-7683(98)00333-3 ↗
27. Sadowski T and Samborski S (2008) Development of damage state in porous ceramics under compression. Computational Materials Science 43(1): 75–81.10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.07.041 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0020-7683(99)00244-910.1016/S0020-7683(99)00244-9 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.06.00910.1016/j.ijplas.2008.06.009 ↗
30. 10.1002/nme.284010.1002/nme.2840 ↗
31. 10.1002/nme.332410.1002/nme.3324 ↗
32. Vorobiev O and Herbold E (2012) Numerical recipes for equivalent continuum modeling of jointed systems . Technical report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA.
33. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.02.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.02.002 ↗
34. 10.1029/JZ070i002p0038110.1029/JZ070i002p00381 ↗
35. 10.1177/105678951452080110.1177/1056789514520801 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.04610.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.046 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.03110.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.031 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2003.12.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2003.12.003 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.01010.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.010 ↗
40. Zhou X and Hao H (2009) Mesoscale modelling and analysis of damage and fragmentation of concrete slab under contact detonation. International Journal of Impact Engineering 36(12): 1315–1326.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.02.010 ↗