Anisotropic, rate-dependent ductile fracture of Ti-6Al-4V alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
An extensive experimental campaign was run to investigate the influence of the loading direction, stress state (triaxiality ratio ranging from −0.5 to 1), and strain rate (from 10−3 to 1.5x103s−1) on the ductile fracture of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Microscopic and macroscopic observations provided some insight into the shear-driven or micro-voiding-controlled damage mechanisms prevailing at low and high triaxiality ratios, respectively. Numerical simulations were run to determine the local loading paths to fracture in terms of plastic strain as a function of stress triaxiality ratio and Lode parameter. The ductility was found to be anisotropic, but only weakly dependent on the strain rate in the considered range. The anisotropy in ductility was different in tension (maximum along DD) and in compression (maximum along ND). The fracture strain decreased with the absolute value of the triaxiality, with a maximum close to zero. No clear correlation with the Lode parameter was found.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Safran Aircraft Engines, Réau, France
Laboratoire de Mécanique des Solides, CNRS UMR 7649, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France
ICA, Université de Toulouse, ISAE-SUPAERO, Mines Albi, UPS, INSA, 31000 Toulouse, Francede Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Funding
Association Nationale Recherche Technologie
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/105678950605804610.1177/1056789506058046 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.01.00510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.01.005 ↗
3. 10.1177/105678951246835510.1177/1056789512468355 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.00610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.01110.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.011 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.09.03110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.09.031 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.08.02010.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.08.020 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.04710.1016/j.msea.2011.12.047 ↗
9. 10.1051/jp4:2002073010.1051/jp4:20020730 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.10332210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103322 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11340-013-9712-y10.1007/s11340-013-9712-y ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.10.00310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.10.003 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10704-016-0076-z10.1007/s10704-016-0076-z ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.10368510.1016/j.jmps.2019.103685 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.12.00910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.12.009 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0266385310.1007/BF02663853 ↗
17. Hfaiedh N · International Journal of Damage Mechanics · 2018 · 1
18. 10.1533/ijcr.2004.028910.1533/ijcr.2004.0289 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.07.00810.1016/j.tafmec.2018.07.008 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10704-012-9683-510.1007/s10704-012-9683-5 ↗
21. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-910.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
22. 10.1115/1.400194010.1115/1.4001940 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00080-010.1016/S0924-0136(97)00080-0 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.11.00910.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.11.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2014.05.00110.1016/j.mechmat.2014.05.001 ↗
26. 10.1177/105678951664564410.1177/1056789516645644 ↗
27. 10.1177/105678951142747210.1177/1056789511427472 ↗
28. LSTC (2018) LS-DYNA Theory Manual. Livermore: LSTC.
29. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01160-110.1016/S0921-5093(01)01160-1 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10704-016-0091-010.1007/s10704-016-0091-0 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.00610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.006 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.08.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.08.002 ↗
33. 10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-710.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
34. 10.1007/s11340-015-0061-x10.1007/s11340-015-0061-x ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.00710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.007 ↗
36. Ruiz de Sotto M (2020) Characterization and modeling of the thermo-mechanical behavior of aTi-6Al-4V alloy under dynamic complex loading. PhD Thesis, University of Toulouse, France.
37. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.10277710.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102777 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.09.00710.1016/j.ijplas.2015.09.007 ↗
39. Vilotic D · Experimental Mechanics · 2016 · 57 · 59
40. 10.1177/105678950605804710.1177/1056789506058047 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.04510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.045 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.03.00310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.03.003 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.04.01810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.04.018 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.11646210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116462 ↗