journal article·2020-04

A multi-scale fatigue–creep coupled damage model for steel structures under extreme cyclic loading and temperature

Huajing Guo, Bin Sun, Zhaoxia Li

Publisher page

Abstract

In order to compute the process from the damage accumulation to failure of steel structures under extreme cyclic loading and temperature, a multi-scale fatigue–creep damage model has been developed. Based on the balance of micro-crack number density theory, the multi-scale fatigue damage model has been established using generalized self-consistent method. In the fatigue damage model, the scatter of micro-crack length is expressed by two-parameter Weibull distribution and the interaction among micro-cracks has been studied. In turn, the multi-scale fatigue–creep damage model has been developed by considering the nonlinear coupling of fatigue damage and creep damage. The validity of the developed model has been verified by comparing the predicted damage evolution curves with experimental damage data. The developed model enables to more accurately study the fatigue degradation of steel structures than the phenomenological damage models. Fatigue–creep damage analysis on steel turbine blades under different extreme operating condition are performed using the developed model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Fire effects on concrete materials · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering Mechanics, Southeast University, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Engineering Mechanics, Nanjing, China

Funding

"Zhishan" Young Scholars · Jiangsu Province natural sciences fund subsidization project · the National Program on Key Research Project

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Ainsworth RA (ed) (2003) Assessment Procedure for the High Temperature Response of Structures . Issue 3. Barnwood: BEGL Ltd.
2. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00063.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00063.x ↗
3. ASCE · Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE · 1982 · 108 · 3
4. ASME (2004) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Part III, Division 1, Subsection NH—Class 1 Components in Elevated Temperature Service . New York: ASME.
5. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.05.02710.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.05.027 ↗
6. Bai YL · Advances in Mechanics · 2006 · 58 · 286
7. Betten J (2005) Creep Mechanics . Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
8. 10.1016/0029-5493(81)90007-810.1016/0029-5493(81)90007-8 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01216.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01216.x ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00715.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00715.x ↗
11. 10.1016/0022-5096(94)90035-310.1016/0022-5096(94)90035-3 ↗
12. 10.1080/0141861970822374110.1080/01418619708223741 ↗
13. 10.1177/105678951774766410.1177/1056789517747664 ↗
14. Kachanov LM · Izv Akad Nauk USSR Otd Tekhn Nauk · 1958 · 8 · 26
15. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1990.tb00621.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1990.tb00621.x ↗
16. Lemaitre J (1996) A Course on Damage Mechanics . Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-18255-6 ↗
17. Lemaitre J and Chaboche JL (1994) Mechanics of Solid Materials . Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18. 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.04.00410.1016/j.jmps.2012.04.004 ↗
19. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1987.tb01153.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1987.tb01153.x ↗
20. Miller KJ, Mohanmed HJ and DelosRios ER (1968) The Behaviour of Short Fatigue Cracks . London: Mechanical Engineering Publications.
21. Miner MA · Journal of Applied Mechanics-Transactions of the ASME · 1945 · 67 · A15910.1115/1.4009458 ↗
22. 10.1115/1.307838310.1115/1.3078383 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00419-018-1430-610.1007/s00419-018-1430-6 ↗
24. 10.2514/3.2277010.2514/3.22770 ↗
25. 10.1111/ffe.1277110.1111/ffe.12771 ↗
26. 10.1177/105678951774766510.1177/1056789517747665 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.08.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2009.08.001 ↗
28. 10.3184/096034007X30049410.3184/096034007X300494 ↗
29. 10.1177/105678951143051910.1177/1056789511430519 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.03.03110.1016/j.jcsr.2018.03.031 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.06.01410.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.06.014 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.02.01310.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.02.013 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.01.02110.1016/j.commatsci.2016.01.021 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10338-018-0048-010.1007/s10338-018-0048-0 ↗
35. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1992.tb01305.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1992.tb01305.x ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.05.02510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.05.025 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10064-016-0992-110.1007/s10064-016-0992-1 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.05.03610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.05.036 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.00210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.002 ↗
40. 10.1016/0013-7944(92)90289-Q10.1016/0013-7944(92)90289-Q ↗
41. Weibull W · Journal of Applied Mechanics-Transactions of the ASME · 1951 · 18 · 29310.1115/1.4010337 ↗
42. 10.1177/105678951879264910.1177/1056789518792649 ↗
43. 10.1680/jgele.18.0013410.1680/jgele.18.00134 ↗
44. 10.3390/en1109234910.3390/en11092349 ↗
45. 10.1177/105678951143278910.1177/1056789511432789 ↗