An enhanced void-crack-based Rousselier damage model for ductile fracture with the XFEM
Source abstract
Abstract
This work presents a modelling strategy for ductile fracture materials by implementing the Rousselier damage model with the extended finite element method (XFEM). The implicit integration scheme and consistent tangent modulus based on a radial return mapping algorithm for this constitutive model are developed by the user-defined material subroutine UMAT in ABAQUS/Standard. To enhance the modelling of the crack development in the materials, the XFEM is used that allows modelling of arbitrary discontinuities, where the mesh does not have to be aligned with the boundaries of material interfaces. This modelling strategy, so-called Rousselier-UMAT-XFEM (RuX) model, is proposed to connect both concepts, which gives an advantage in predicting the material behaviour of ductile material in terms of voids and crack relation. This is the first contribution where XFEM is used in ductile fracture analysis for micromechanical damage problems. The results indicate that the RuX model is a promising technique for predicting the void volume fraction damage and crack extension in ductile material, which shows a good agreement in terms of stress–strain and force–displacement relationships.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Numerical methods in engineering · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Computer-Aided Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Research Group (CA2M), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Build Environments, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand
Funding
University of Sheffield · Ministry of Education Malaysia · Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.15282/jmes.11.1.2017.9.023010.15282/jmes.11.1.2017.9.0230 ↗
2. 10.1002/nme.162024071310.1002/nme.1620240713 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00466-013-0885-010.1007/s00466-013-0885-0 ↗
4. Arun S (2015) Finite element modelling of fracture and damage in austenitic stainless steel in nuclear power plant . PhD Thesis, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.
5. 10.1016/0029-5493(87)90235-410.1016/0029-5493(87)90235-4 ↗
6. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
7. Bensaada R · Nature & Technology · 2016 · 36 · 31
8. 10.1177/105678950910348210.1177/1056789509103482 ↗
9. 10.2140/jomms.2006.1.18310.2140/jomms.2006.1.183 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.02.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2012.02.005 ↗
11. 10.1080/15502287.2013.78438310.1080/15502287.2013.784383 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.006 ↗
13. De Souza Neto EA, Peric D and Owen DRJ (2008) Computational Methods for Plasticity: Theory and Applications . New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9780470694626 ↗
14. 10.1177/105678951667688210.1177/1056789516676882 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.10.01510.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.10.015 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.01.01110.1016/j.commatsci.2013.01.011 ↗
17. 10.1115/1.344340110.1115/1.3443401 ↗
18. 10.1177/105678951769587210.1177/1056789517695872 ↗
19. 10.1177/105678951664003710.1177/1056789516640037 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cma.2007.12.01510.1016/j.cma.2007.12.015 ↗
21. Navarro-Zafra J, Curiel-Sosa J, Moreno MS, et al. (2016) An approach for dynamic analysis of stationary cracks using XFEM. In: Proceedings of the 24th UK Conference of the Association for Computational Mechanics in Engineering , pp. 303–308.
22. Rousselier G · 1981 · 331
23. 10.1016/0029-5493(87)90234-210.1016/0029-5493(87)90234-2 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.04.01110.1016/j.ijplas.2005.04.011 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.09.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2013.09.002 ↗
26. Rousselier G · 1977 · 332
27. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.06.00610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.06.006 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00466-012-0804-910.1007/s00466-012-0804-9 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.08.00610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.08.006 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.08.03010.1016/j.compstruct.2014.08.030 ↗
31. 10.1016/0045-7825(85)90070-210.1016/0045-7825(85)90070-2 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.08.00210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.08.002 ↗
33. 10.1002/1097-0207(20000820)48:11<1549::AID-NME955>3.0.CO;2-A10.1002/1097-0207(20000820)48:11<1549::AID-NME955>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
34. 10.1023/A:100736872237410.1023/A:1007368722374 ↗
35. 10.1615/CompMechComputApplIntJ.v6.i3.4010.1615/CompMechComputApplIntJ.v6.i3.40 ↗
36. 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
37. 10.1177/105678951456593310.1177/1056789514565933 ↗
38. Wilkins ML (1969) Calculation of Elastic-Plastic Flow . Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, University of California.
39. Zhang ZL (1994) A practical micro mechanical model based local approach methodology for the analysis of ductile fracture of welded T-joints . PhD Thesis, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland.
40. 10.1016/0045-7825(94)00707-T10.1016/0045-7825(94)00707-T ↗
41. 10.1016/0045-7825(94)00706-S10.1016/0045-7825(94)00706-S ↗
42. 10.1002/nme.162038120610.1002/nme.1620381206 ↗