journal article·2017-04Open access

Validation of linear damage rules using random loading

Mitja Franko, Marko Sedlaček, Bojan Podgornik, Marko Nagode

Abstract

Fatigue damage is a parameter which plays an important role in lifetime and reliability predictions of randomly loaded structures. In this paper, four different forms of the Miner linear accumulation damage rule are examined. They are used to compare observed experimental damage and the results of numerical simulations for both uniaxial and multiaxial fatigue. First, critical fatigue damage values for all forms of the Miner accumulation damage rule are calculated for uniaxial cases. Based on the results presented in this paper, it has been established that for high strength materials the critical damage value is around 0.3. These results are then applied to the multiaxial cases. The multiaxiality is taken into account using either the signed von Mises or critical plane method. Finally, the fatigue fracture surface has been calculated and compared to the experimental pattern of fatigue fracture. The results show that the fatigue fracture surface determined by the numerical simulation is comparable to the fatigue fracture observed experimentally.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Institute of Materials and Technology, Ljubljana, Slovenia

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. ASTM E739-10 (2010) Standard practise for statistical analysis of linear or linearized stress-Life (S-N) and strain-life (ɛ-N) fatigue data. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
2. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00183.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00183.x ↗
3. EN ISO 7500-1:2004 (2004) Metallic materials – Verification of static uniaxial testing machines – Part 1: Tension/compression testing machines – Verification and calibration of the force-measuring system. ISO.
4. 10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00081-910.1016/S0142-1123(97)00081-9 ↗
5. FKM Rihtlinie · 2012
6. 10.1016/j.ress.2014.10.01210.1016/j.ress.2014.10.012 ↗
7. Gatts RR · Journal of Fluids Engineering · 1961 · 83 · 529
8. Haibach E · 2006
9. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01577.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01577.x ↗
10. 10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00014-110.1016/S0142-1123(00)00014-1 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.02.01510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.02.015 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0261-3069(03)00157-210.1016/S0261-3069(03)00157-2 ↗
13. Lee Y-L · 2005
14. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.09.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.09.009 ↗
15. LMS Falancs (2002) In: Schäfer G (ed.) Theory manual . Version 2.9. LMS Deutschland GmbH.
16. 10.1177/105678951452407510.1177/1056789514524075 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00030-410.1016/S0142-1123(99)00030-4 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0142-1123(96)00064-310.1016/S0142-1123(96)00064-3 ↗
19. Rice JA · 2007
20. Rosa U (2008) Durability prediction methods in the development of a product under thermo-mechanical fatigue . PhD Thesis, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
21. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01154.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01154.x ↗
22. Schijve J · 2001
23. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.04.00410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.04.004 ↗
24. Stephens RI · 2001
25. 10.1177/105678951349797710.1177/1056789513497977 ↗
26. 10.1016/0142-1123(96)00002-310.1016/0142-1123(96)00002-3 ↗
27. 10.1177/105678951454422810.1177/1056789514544228 ↗
28. 10.1177/105678951455304210.1177/1056789514553042 ↗