journal article·2021-04Open access

Destructuration of saturated natural loess: From experiments to constitutive modeling

Yukai Fu, Zhiwei Gao, Yi Hong, Tonglu Li, Akhil Garg

Publisher page

Abstract

It has been well recognized that unsaturated natural loess shows significant volume contraction upon wetting due to its metastable internal structure. But the structural effect on stress–strain relationship of saturated natural (undisturbed) loess is much less explored. Few attempts have been made in proposing a constitutive model for saturated natural loess. This study presents both laboratory tests and constitutive modeling of a saturated natural loess, with special focus on the structural effect and evolution of structure damage during loading. Oedometer and drained triaxial compression tests have been carried out on undisturbed and remolded saturated loess samples. It is found that the natural soil structure has dramatic influence on mechanical behavior of loess, including the compressibility, dilatancy, and shear strength. Destructuration, which is the damage of soil structure with deformation, is observed in both oedometer and triaxial tests. A constitutive model is proposed for saturated loess based on the experimental observations. The model is established within the theoretical framework of subloading and superloading surface concepts. Destructuration of loess is assumed to be affected by both plastic volumetric and shear strain. A new method for determining the initial degree of structure is proposed. The model can reasonably predict the compression and shear behavior of both undisturbed and remolded saturated loess.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Soil and Unsaturated Flow · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Geological Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China

Water Cycle and Geological Environment Observation and Research Station for the Chinese Loess Plateau, Ministry of Education, Zhengning, Gansu, P. R. China

James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Key Laboratory of Offshore Geotechnics and Material of Zhejiang Province, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

Division of Computational Mathematics and Engineering, Institute for Computational Science, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Funding

Qianjiang Talent Plan · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Asaoka A, Nakano M, Noda T (1998) Super loading yield surface concept for the saturated structured soils. In: Annamaria Cividini (ed) Application of Numerical Methods to Geotechnical Problems . Vienna: Springer, pp.233–242.10.1007/978-3-7091-2512-0_22 ↗
2. 10.3208/sandf.40.2_9910.3208/sandf.40.2_99 ↗
3. 10.3208/sandf.42.5_4710.3208/sandf.42.5_47 ↗
4. 10.1016/0013-7952(73)90006-910.1016/0013-7952(73)90006-9 ↗
5. 10.1680/geot.2004.54.4.26910.1680/geot.2004.54.4.269 ↗
6. 10.1139/t03-09910.1139/t03-099 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.tust.2019.10317810.1016/j.tust.2019.103178 ↗
8. 10.3390/app923520610.3390/app9235206 ↗
9. Delage P, Cui YJ, Antoine P (2005) Geotechnical problems related with loess deposits in Northern France. In: Proceedings of international conference on problematic soils, 25–27 May 2005. pp. 1–24. Famagusta: Eastern Mediterranean University.
10. 10.1016/S0012-8252(01)00050-210.1016/S0012-8252(01)00050-2 ↗
11. 10.1016/1040-6182(94)90032-910.1016/1040-6182(94)90032-9 ↗
12. 10.1016/S1040-6182(00)00086-010.1016/S1040-6182(00)00086-0 ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000079310.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000793 ↗
14. Garg A, Huang H, Kushvaha V, et al. (2020). Mechanism of biochar soil pore -gas -water interaction: gas properties of biochar-amended sandy soil at different degrees of compaction using KNN modeling. Acta Geophysica 68(1): 207–217.10.1007/s11600-019-00387-y ↗
15. 10.1007/BF0263545110.1007/BF02635451 ↗
16. Hong Y, Wang L, et al. (2020). 3D elastoplastic model for fine-grained gassy soil considering the gas-dependent yield surface shape and stress-dilatancy. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 146(5): 04020037.10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001760 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2010.12.00510.1016/j.compgeo.2010.12.005 ↗
18. 10.1115/1.400595810.1115/1.4005958 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.07.02110.1016/j.enggeo.2014.07.021 ↗
20. Jin Y, Yin ZY (2020) Enhancement of backtracking search algorithm for identifying soil parameters. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics . 44(9): 1239–1261.10.1002/nag.3059 ↗
21. 10.3208/sandf.43.3_9510.3208/sandf.43.3_95 ↗
22. Liu MD, Liu J, Horpibulsuk S, et al. (2013) Simulating the stress and strain behavior of loess via SCC model. In: Proceedings of the 18th Southeast Asian Geotechnical and Inaugural AGSSEA conference , 29–31 May, Singapore.10.3850/978-981-07-4948-4_075 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000148510.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001485 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000127810.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001278 ↗
25. 10.1680/geolett.11.0000310.1680/geolett.11.00003 ↗
26. 10.1680/jgeot.16.P.29310.1680/jgeot.16.P.293 ↗
27. 10.1016/0013-7952(94)90045-010.1016/0013-7952(94)90045-0 ↗
28. 10.1680/geot.2000.50.2.15310.1680/geot.2000.50.2.153 ↗
29. 10.1002/nag.43410.1002/nag.434 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.11.01110.1016/j.enggeo.2008.11.011 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.10.02310.1016/j.enggeo.2013.10.023 ↗
32. 10.1139/t02-11910.1139/t02-119 ↗
33. Wood DM · 1990
34. 10.1139/cgj-2015-020010.1139/cgj-2015-0200 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.02.02110.1016/j.enggeo.2017.02.021 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.04.01310.1016/j.compgeo.2015.04.013 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.10033610.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100336 ↗
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000149910.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001499 ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000064910.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000649 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.undsp.2016.08.00110.1016/j.undsp.2016.08.001 ↗
41. 10.1002/nag.97710.1002/nag.977 ↗
42. 10.1007/s11440-016-0486-010.1007/s11440-016-0486-0 ↗
43. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000052710.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000527 ↗
44. 10.3208/sandf.47.63510.3208/sandf.47.635 ↗
45. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000064710.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000647 ↗
46. 10.1680/jgeot.17.T.03110.1680/jgeot.17.T.031 ↗