journal article·2008-11

Fatigue Crack Growth Prediction under Spectrum Load Sequence in an Aluminum Alloy by K*-RMS Approach

C.M. Manjunatha

Publisher page

Abstract

Constant amplitude fatigue crack growth (FCG) tests were performed at various stress ratios in D16 (2024-T3 equivalent) aluminum alloy using single edge notched tension specimens. Empirical FCG law was derived in terms of crack driving force parameter, K*. The spectrum load sequence of a combat aircraft was approximated as an equivalent constant amplitude (CA) load sequence with maximum and minimum stresses as root-mean-square (RMS) maximum and minimum stresses of the spectrum, respectively. The fatigue crack growth behavior was then predicted under this apparent CA load sequence using the K*-RMS approach. For comparison, the conventional method of FCG prediction using crack closure concept was also performed. In this method, empirical FCG law in terms of effective stress intensity factor range, ▵K eff was obtained from the constant amplitude FCGR data. Assuming a constant K op level for spectrum sequence, FCG behavior was predicted through cycle-by-cycle method. Experimental FCG behavior under spectrum load sequence was determined and compared with predicted results. It was observed that the K*-RMS approach provided a fairly good correlation with results obtained from experimental as well as those predicted by the crack closure concept. The predicted fatigue life was conservative and the fatigue life ratio, N pred /N expt , was about 0.87. The simplicity of the proposed K*-RMS approach and the reasonable accuracy in fatigue life predictions are quite encouraging.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Structural Integrity Division, National Aerospace Laboratories Bangalore 560017, India,

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Astm (1997a). Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates, ASTM E 647-95, American Society for Testing and Materials, PA, 3.01: pp. 578-614.
2. Astm (1997b). Standard Practices for Cycle Counting in Fatigue Analysis, ASTM E 1049-85 , American Society for Testing and Materials, PA, 3.01: pp. 726-734.
3. Bathias, C.
4. 10.1520/STP33374S10.1520/STP33374S ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2003.06.00110.1016/j.engfracmech.2003.06.001 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00055-910.1016/S0142-1123(99)00055-9 ↗
7. Dover, W.D. · Journal of Society for Environmental Engineers · 1976 · 3
8. 10.1520/STP26680S10.1520/STP26680S ↗
9. 10.1016/0142-1123(84)90050-110.1016/0142-1123(84)90050-1 ↗
10. 10.1520/STP27205S10.1520/STP27205S ↗
11. 10.1520/STP28333S10.1520/STP28333S ↗
12. James, M.N. · Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Fracture · 1997 · 5 · 2403
13. Johnson, W.S. (1981). Muti-parameter Yield Zone Model for Predicting Spectrum Crack Growth, In: Chang, J.B. and Hudson, C.M. (eds), Methods and Models for Predicting Fatigue Crack Growth Under Random Loading , pp. 85-102, ASTM STP 748, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.10.1520/STP28335S ↗
14. 10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00028-X10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00028-X ↗
15. 10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00072-510.1016/S0142-1123(02)00072-5 ↗
16. 10.1177/105678950605860510.1177/1056789506058605 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00158-X10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00158-X ↗
18. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00023-810.1016/S0142-1123(01)00023-8 ↗
19. Macha, D.E. · Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Stress Analysis · 1979 · 36 · 207
20. 10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00132-410.1016/S0142-1123(03)00132-4 ↗
21. 10.2514/1.1366810.2514/1.13668 ↗
22. 10.1007/BF0003392910.1007/BF00033929 ↗
23. 10.1520/STP28334S10.1520/STP28334S ↗
24. 10.1016/0013-7944(94)90091-410.1016/0013-7944(94)90091-4 ↗
25. Paris, P.C. · Journal of Basic Engineering · 1963 · 85 · 52810.1115/1.3656900 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00054-710.1016/S0142-1123(99)00054-7 ↗
27. Sadananda, K. · ASTM STP 1296 · 1997 · 25 · 301
28. 10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00105-110.1016/S0142-1123(03)00105-1 ↗
29. 10.1016/0013-7944(73)90022-210.1016/0013-7944(73)90022-2 ↗
30. 10.1016/0013-7944(79)90038-910.1016/0013-7944(79)90038-9 ↗
31. Schijve, J.
32. 10.1016/0013-7944(81)90034-510.1016/0013-7944(81)90034-5 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00067-710.1016/S0142-1123(03)00067-7 ↗
34. 10.1016/0142-1123(85)90038-610.1016/0142-1123(85)90038-6 ↗
35. 10.1016/0013-7944(77)90007-810.1016/0013-7944(77)90007-8 ↗
36. Vasudevan, A.K. · Materials Science and Engineering · 1994 · 188 · 110.1016/0921-5093(94)90351-4 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00014-X10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00014-X ↗