On the Identification and Validation of an Anisotropic Damage Model Using Full-field Measurements
Source abstract
Abstract
Two different mechanical tests are performed on a laminated composite coupon to induce an anisotropic damage affecting essentially shear modulus softening. The first test is a uniaxial tension loading on a straight coupon, which is used to evaluate the damage law using a conventional approach, while the second contains a notch that enhances dramatically the strain (and hence damage) heterogeneity. A global digital image correlation approach is used to quantify the kinematic fields all along the loading path of the second experiment. Displacement fields are hence evaluated based on a finite element type discretization. A further exploitation based on the reconditioned equilibrium gap method (and without any further information) gives access to a quantitative measurement of the damage law. The latter approach makes use of a finite element model based on the very same mesh and element shape function. This full-field-based identification method compares very well with traditional techniques, up to the stage where macroscopic localization prevents their subsequent exploitations. Moreover, it is shown that neither the type of mechanical test, nor the discretization of the displacement field, affects the identification of the damage law.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Optical measurement and interference techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
LMT, ENS Cachan/CNRS/UPMC/PRES UniverSud Paris, 61 avenue du Président Wilson, F-94235 Cachan Cedex, France
Université de Toulouse; INSA, UPS, Mines Albi, ISAE Institut Clément Ader (ICA), 133 avenue de Rangueil, F-31077 Toulouse, France
EADS – France, Innovation Works, 12 rue Pasteur, BP 76, F-92152 Suresnes Cedex, France
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1108/0264440051060298910.1108/02644400510602989 ↗
2. 10.1016/B978-008043918-1/50031-910.1016/B978-008043918-1/50031-9 ↗
3. 10.1016/0093-6413(93)90032-J10.1016/0093-6413(93)90032-J ↗
4. ASTM (1994). D3518/D3518M Standard Test Method for In-plane Shear Response of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials by Test of a ±45° Laminate, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM.
5. 10.1007/s11340-008-9148-y10.1007/s11340-008-9148-y ↗
6. 10.1177/002199830203600854910.1177/0021998302036008549 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11340-006-9824-810.1007/s11340-006-9824-8 ↗
8. Burr A. · European Journal of Mechanics – A: Solids · 1997 · 16 · 53
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.02.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2007.02.005 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.01.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2004.01.011 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1631-0721(02)01524-310.1016/S1631-0721(02)01524-3 ↗
12. 10.1002/nme.105710.1002/nme.1057 ↗
13. 10.1177/105678950606494010.1177/1056789506064940 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.08.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2009.08.016 ↗
15. 10.1016/0010-4361(94)P3625-B10.1016/0010-4361(94)P3625-B ↗
16. 10.1007/s00419-002-0226-910.1007/s00419-002-0226-9 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00091-910.1016/S0266-3538(00)00091-9 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.05.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2006.05.021 ↗
19. Iosipescu N. · Journal of Materials · 1967 · 2 · 537
20. 10.1520/STP24735S10.1520/STP24735S ↗
21. 10.1016/0266-3538(92)90097-M10.1016/0266-3538(92)90097-M ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.06.05010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.06.050 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00466-009-0392-510.1007/s00466-009-0392-5 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00085-810.1016/S0142-1123(01)00085-8 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.01.02510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.01.025 ↗
26. Rota L. · 1994
27. 10.1007/s11340-007-9103-310.1007/s11340-007-9103-3 ↗
28. Sutton M.A. · 2009
29. Voyadjis G.Z. · 1998