Mechanically consistent continuum damage model for anisotropic composites including damage deactivation
Source abstract
Abstract
Due to crack bridging effects, ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) have outstanding properties that combine a quasi-ductile material behaviour with the high-temperature properties of ceramics. Combined with their high specific strength, this makes them perfectly suitable for high temperature safety relevant components. In view of the design process of CMC components elaborated continuum damage models are required that most importantly consider their anisotropy and damage deactivation effects in a mechanically and mathematically consistent manner. With respect to their damage effect, most of the existing anisotropic models fail with regard to the damage growth criterion leading to the unphysical effect of an increasing stiffness due to damage. Motivated by the modelling process of initially anisotropic composite materials like CMCs, this paper presents the systematic formulation and validation of a mechanically consistent damage effect model together with crack closure effects.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Numerical methods in engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Fraunhofer Institute for Mechanics of Materials IWM, Freiburg, Germany
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Andrieux S, Bamberger Y, Marigo JJ (1986) Un modèle de matériau microfissuré pour les béton et les roches. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 5(3): 471–513.
2. 10.1177/105678951348233810.1177/1056789513482338 ↗
3. 10.1177/105678951667476610.1177/1056789516674766 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00122-110.1016/S0266-3538(01)00122-1 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0167-6636(98)00003-910.1016/S0167-6636(98)00003-9 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.04.02210.1016/j.compositesa.2015.04.022 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.021 ↗
8. 10.1007/978-90-481-3356-710.1007/978-90-481-3356-7 ↗
9. 10.1177/10567895920010010310.1177/105678959200100103 ↗
10. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4001(199808)78:8<507::AID-ZAMM507>3.0.CO;2-F10.1002/(SICI)1521-4001(199808)78:8<507::AID-ZAMM507>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
11. 10.1002/zamm.1992072010810.1002/zamm.19920720108 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04428.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04428.x ↗
13. Böhlke T, Brüggemann C (2001) Graphical represenentation of the generalized hooke’s law. Tech Mech 21(2): 145–158.
14. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00030-510.1016/S0020-7683(00)00030-5 ↗
15. 10.1177/10567895930020040110.1177/105678959300200401 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1270-9638(02)01154-910.1016/S1270-9638(02)01154-9 ↗
17. 10.1177/10567895950040010210.1177/105678959500400102 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00118-X10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00118-X ↗
19. Cordebois JP, Sidoroff F (1979) Anisotropie élastique induite par endommagement. Colloque Euromech 115: 761–774.
20. 10.1007/978-94-009-6827-1_4410.1007/978-94-009-6827-1_44 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.10.01610.1016/j.commatsci.2009.10.016 ↗
22. 10.1007/BF0004341710.1007/BF00043417 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.02.00910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.02.009 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0045-7825(98)80011-X10.1016/S0045-7825(98)80011-X ↗
25. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2012.06.00110.1016/j.euromechsol.2012.06.001 ↗
26. 10.1177/105678951453229910.1177/1056789514532299 ↗
27. Grippon E, Baste S, Martin E, et al. (2012) Damage Characterization of Ceramic Matrix Composites. Proceedings of The 15th European Conference on Composite Materials, 24–28.
28. 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X10.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X ↗
29. 10.1016/0022-5096(83)90048-010.1016/0022-5096(83)90048-0 ↗
30. 10.1007/978-3-319-16342-010.1007/978-3-319-16342-0 ↗
31. Kachanov M (1958) Time of the rupture process under creep conditions. Isv Akad Nauk SSR, Otd Tekh Nauk 8: 26–31.
32. 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70176-510.1016/S0065-2156(08)70176-5 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.05310.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.053 ↗
34. Lemaitre J, Chaboche JL (1978) Aspect phénoménologique de la rupture par endommagement. J Méc Appl 2: 317–365.
35. 10.1016/0167-8442(90)90020-Z10.1016/0167-8442(90)90020-Z ↗
36. 10.1016/0020-7683(93)90158-410.1016/0020-7683(93)90158-4 ↗
37. 10.1016/S1270-9638(97)90035-310.1016/S1270-9638(97)90035-3 ↗
38. 10.1177/105678951038525910.1177/1056789510385259 ↗
39. 10.1016/0022-5096(94)90052-310.1016/0022-5096(94)90052-3 ↗
40. 10.1088/0022-3727/37/23/01510.1088/0022-3727/37/23/015 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0020-7403(97)87627-810.1016/S0020-7403(97)87627-8 ↗
42. 10.1007/978-3-642-81598-0_2810.1007/978-3-642-81598-0_28 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0167-6636(02)00203-X10.1016/S0167-6636(02)00203-X ↗
44. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:8(889)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:8(889) ↗
45. 10.1016/0020-7225(71)90023-110.1016/0020-7225(71)90023-1 ↗
46. 10.1007/BF0035051710.1007/BF00350517 ↗
47. Welemane H (2002) Une Modélisation Des Matétiaux Microfissurés – Application Aux Roches et Aux Bétons. PhD Thesis Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille France.
48. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.04.03810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.04.038 ↗
49. Zawada L, Pierce JL, Przybyla CP, et al. (2017) Evaluation of a melt inflitrated sic/sic ceramic matrix composite. Air Force Research Laboratory Report 1–59.
50. 10.1016/0020-7225(93)90008-I10.1016/0020-7225(93)90008-I ↗
51. 10.1115/1.311106610.1115/1.3111066 ↗
52. 10.1007/BF0079929610.1007/BF00799296 ↗
53. 10.1007/BF0078791310.1007/BF00787913 ↗
54. 10.1002/nag.74110.1002/nag.741 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.07.01410.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.07.014 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.08310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.083 ↗