Statistical damage model with strain softening for lime-stabilized rammed earth after elevated temperature
Source abstract
Abstract
Many historical earthen buildings are damaged due to fire exposure in the past. It is important to understand the strength degradation of rammed earth after elevated temperature for guiding the strategy of building protection or rehabilitation. A total of 24 unconfined compression tests are conducted on lime-stabilized rammed earth specimens after elevated temperature up to 700°C. A quasi-linear reduction in strength and stiffness is found for rammed earth with the increase of temperature. At high temperature, the ductility of rammed earth is enhanced, e.g., strain at peak strength of 2.5% and 1.5% at 700°C and 20°C, respectively. Microstructural analyses demonstrate that with the increase of temperature, the specimen becomes more porous with reduced calcium carbonate precipitation, explaining the strength reduction. A new thermal damage model is proposed to describe the behavior of rammed earth after elevated temperature, in which the closure of pores is captured to show unrecoverable deformation, and the skeleton part is simulated using a thermal damage variable in a statistical manner to present the damage evolution (strain softening). By comparing with the measured stress-strain curves, one can confirm that the proposed method can provide effective prediction for the response of rammed earth after elevated temperature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hygrothermal properties of building materials · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Building materials and conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Civil Engineering, Urban and Rural Architectural Heritage Protection Technology Key Laboratory of Fujian Province, Key Laboratory for Intelligent Infrastructure and Monitoring of Fujian Province, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, China
School of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Funding
Fujian Province Foreign Cooperation Project · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:7(902)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:7(902) ↗
2. 10.1016/0360-1323(94)00041-P10.1016/0360-1323(94)00041-P ↗
3. 10.1007/s13369-021-05583-x10.1007/s13369-021-05583-x ↗
4. Beckett C Kazamias K Law A (2019) Investigations into the high temperature behaviour of unstabilised rammed earth. In: Fifth international conference on sustainable construction materials and technologies (SCMT5) Kingston University London UK.
5. 10.1080/14488353.2015.109267110.1080/14488353.2015.1092671 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11809810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118098 ↗
7. Cao W-G, Zhang C, He M, et al. (2016) Statistical damage simulation method of strain softening deformation process for rocks considering characteristics of void compaction stage. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 38(10): 1754–1761.
8. 10.1139/T09-14810.1139/T09-148 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.08.00910.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.08.009 ↗
10. GB/T 50123-2019 (2019). Standard of Geotechnical Testing Method. Edited by Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development and State Administration for Market Regulation of the People's Republic of China. Beijing: China Planning Press.
11. 10.1016/j.tca.2018.06.01810.1016/j.tca.2018.06.018 ↗
12. 10.1680/jgele.19.0002610.1680/jgele.19.00026 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.16810.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.168 ↗
14. 10.3208/sandf.44.3_6910.3208/sandf.44.3_69 ↗
15. Lemaitre J, Desmorat R (2005) Engineering Damage Mechanics: Ductile, Creep, Fatigue and Brittle Failures. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.33510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.335 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.27010.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.270 ↗
18. 10.1177/105678951557050710.1177/1056789515570507 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.11.01310.1016/j.enggeo.2014.11.013 ↗
20. 10.1080/15583058.2015.110439910.1080/15583058.2015.1104399 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11998910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119989 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12596910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125969 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000298610.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002986 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.10672810.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106728 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.clay.2021.10620210.1016/j.clay.2021.106202 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2004.08.01010.1016/j.ceramint.2004.08.010 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11833310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118333 ↗
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.000015210.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000152 ↗
29. 10.1007/s00603-021-02474-310.1007/s00603-021-02474-3 ↗
30. 10.1515/acgeo-2016-009010.1515/acgeo-2016-0090 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.04.01410.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.04.014 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12431910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124319 ↗
33. 10.1177/105678951772683810.1177/1056789517726838 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.01.03010.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.01.030 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.11910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.119 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.08.00510.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.08.005 ↗
37. 10.1139/t89-02910.1139/t89-029 ↗
38. 10.1680/geot.1996.46.3.51510.1680/geot.1996.46.3.515 ↗
39. 10.1155/2019/493258610.1155/2019/4932586 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.06510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.065 ↗
41. 10.1007/s11440-018-0726-610.1007/s11440-018-0726-6 ↗