journal article·2021-11

Effect of fisheye failure on material performance inducing error circle under high cycles

Haiyan Ge, Xintian Liu, Xu Wang, Xiaolan Wang, Haijie Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

In the engineering application of high strength steel and surface strengthening steel, fisheye failure is often happened in high cycle fatigue. To explore the effect of fisheye failure on high cycle fatigue properties of materials, a high cycle fatigue life model was established based on the Murakami and Tanaka’s fatigue strength models. The model introduces the error circle to evaluate fisheye size, and discusses the influencing factors of fatigue strength. The results show that the size and depth of fisheye failure will affect performance of materials. The proposed model considering the size and depth of defect quantitatively shows the influence of fisheye details on material performance, and effectively predicts the high/ultra-high cycle fatigue life.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Fire effects on concrete materials · High Temperature Alloys and Creep

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.05210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.052 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.06010.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.060 ↗
3. 10.12989/sem.2016.60.1.07110.12989/sem.2016.60.1.071 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00136-910.1016/S0921-5093(03)00136-9 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10182-017-0317-010.1007/s10182-017-0317-0 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2015.07.00710.1016/j.tafmec.2015.07.007 ↗
7. 10.1108/EC-02-2020-011110.1108/EC-02-2020-0111 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10664410.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106644 ↗
9. 10.1177/095440701983243310.1177/0954407019832433 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.12.01010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.12.010 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10558410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105584 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11276-014-0820-010.1007/s11276-014-0820-0 ↗
13. 10.1177/105678951352017510.1177/1056789513520175 ↗
14. 10.1111/ffe.1313310.1111/ffe.13133 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ress.2020.10718710.1016/j.ress.2020.107187 ↗
16. 10.1111/ffe.1323510.1111/ffe.13235 ↗
17. 10.1177/105678951987168410.1177/1056789519871684 ↗
18. Masuda C · Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part A · 1985 · 51 · 84710.1299/kikaib.51.847 ↗
19. 10.1299/kikaia.52.84710.1299/kikaia.52.847 ↗
20. 10.1016/0142-1123(94)90001-910.1016/0142-1123(94)90001-9 ↗
21. 10.1007/s00170-018-2396-910.1007/s00170-018-2396-9 ↗
22. 10.1111/ffe.1277410.1111/ffe.12774 ↗
23. 10.1111/ffe.1305010.1111/ffe.13050 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.09710.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.097 ↗
25. 10.1111/ffe.1271510.1111/ffe.12715 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.11.07510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.11.075 ↗
27. Paris PC, Marines-Garcia I, Hertzberg RW, et al. (2004) The relationship of effective stress intensity, elastic modulus and Burgers-vector on fatigue crack growth as associated with“fisheye” gigacycle fatigue phenomena. In: Proc.VHCF-3 , Kyoto, Japan. Kyoto, Japan: Society of Materials Science, Japan (JSMS).
28. 10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.01510.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.015 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10542410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105424 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10247710.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102477 ↗
31. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00574.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00574.x ↗
32. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.04.01510.1016/j.msea.2019.04.015 ↗
33. Sun ZD (2016) Competitive failure mechanisms and strength-life prediction approaches of carburized/nitrided gear steel under very high cycle fatigue . PhD Thesis, Beijing Institute of Technology, China.
34. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00547.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00547.x ↗
35. 10.1080/0361092080210157110.1080/03610920802101571 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.17110.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.171 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.11.04210.1016/j.commatsci.2017.11.042 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2020.11721110.1016/j.jlumin.2020.117211 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.00810.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.008 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.apm.2019.04.01010.1016/j.apm.2019.04.010 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.12.00210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.12.002 ↗
42. 10.1177/105678951771911710.1177/1056789517719117 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.01310.1016/j.ress.2015.12.013 ↗
44. 10.1177/105678951879265810.1177/1056789518792658 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.01.08510.1016/j.msea.2018.01.085 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.apm.2019.09.04510.1016/j.apm.2019.09.045 ↗