An integrated unified elasto-viscoplastic fatigue and creep damage model with characterization method for structural analysis of nickel-based high-temperature structure
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper proposes an integrated unified elasto-viscoplastic fatigue and creep damage model with modified hardening equations to simulate the elasto-viscoplasticity, primary-secondary and tertiary creep, relaxation, cyclic softening, temperature-dependency, and creep-fatigue interaction (CFI) damage. For this purpose, we integrate the creep damage and fatigue damage model into the viscoplasticity-damage model to predict tertiary creep and cyclic softening behavior caused by creep and fatigue damage modes. Interaction effects between each damage mode are considered by the creep-fatigue interaction (CFI) damage scheme. This paper also introduces a genetic algorithm-based integrated characterization method that can effectively optimize material input parameters of the unified elasto-viscoplastic-damage material model with limited experimental data. Implicit Euler's backward iteration scheme is adopted to improve the convergence and accuracy of solutions. The proposed material model is implemented in UMAT for finite element (FE) analysis of high-temperature structures under cyclic-dwell loading. Experimental data of tensile, dwell, creep, and cyclic loading at various temperatures are used to verify the model. Finally, full-scale turbine blade FE analysis is performed under anisothermal conditions. The proposed material modeling framework can also be utilized for other high-temperature structures, such as power plants, leading-edge nose cones, etc.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Fire effects on concrete materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
Institute of Advanced Aerospace Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
Institute of Engineering Research, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Armstrong PJ, Frederick C (1966) A Mathematical Representation of the Multiaxial Bauschinger Effect . Central Electricity Generating Board [and] Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, Berkeley, UK.
2. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.09.00110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.09.001 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.04.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2012.04.004 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.12.00810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.12.008 ↗
5. 10.1177/105678952095040910.1177/1056789520950409 ↗
6. 10.1115/1.404022310.1115/1.4040223 ↗
7. 10.1115/1.403348810.1115/1.4033488 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10505310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105053 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.14023110.1016/j.msea.2020.140231 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.04.01510.1016/j.ijplas.2018.04.015 ↗
11. 10.1016/0749-6419(89)90015-610.1016/0749-6419(89)90015-6 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.03.00910.1016/j.ijplas.2008.03.009 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.07.02810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.07.028 ↗
14. 10.1007/s42243-018-0073-810.1007/s42243-018-0073-8 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.08.01610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.08.016 ↗
16. Doghri I · 2013
17. 10.1093/oso/9780198568261.001.000110.1093/oso/9780198568261.001.0001 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.06.00910.1016/j.cnsns.2012.06.009 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10645610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106456 ↗
20. 10.1243/14644207JMDA27310.1243/14644207JMDA273 ↗
21. Gordon AP (2006) Crack Initiation Modeling of a Directionally-Solidified Nickel-Base Superalloy. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, Ann Arbor, p. 481.
22. 10.1177/105678951987133910.1177/1056789519871339 ↗
23. 10.1016/0956-7151(90)90077-T10.1016/0956-7151(90)90077-T ↗
24. 10.1007/s12598-016-0713-810.1007/s12598-016-0713-8 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01066.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01066.x ↗
26. Kachanov L · 2013
27. 10.1023/A:101867102200810.1023/A:1018671022008 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.01510.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.015 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.06.01410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.06.014 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.03.01210.1016/j.ijplas.2019.03.012 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.06.01910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.06.019 ↗
32. 10.1177/105678951983588110.1177/1056789519835881 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cma.2005.05.02110.1016/j.cma.2005.05.021 ↗
34. 10.1007/978-94-007-2666-610.1007/978-94-007-2666-6 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.11.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2012.11.001 ↗
36. 10.1090/qam/14453610.1090/qam/144536 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.01.02210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.01.022 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2013.08.00110.1016/j.ijpvp.2013.08.001 ↗
39. Simo JC · 2006
40. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.04.00210.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.04.002 ↗
41. Systemes D (2020) SIMULIA User Assistance 2021 . Providence, RI, USA: Abaqus.
42. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab153410.1088/2053-1591/ab1534 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.01.00210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.01.002 ↗
44. 10.1177/105678951453700710.1177/1056789514537007 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.09.06710.1016/j.msea.2017.09.067 ↗
46. 10.1177/105678952093040810.1177/1056789520930408 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.11.02110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.11.021 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.10412310.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.104123 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.01.00710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.01.007 ↗
50. 10.1177/105678951988910310.1177/1056789519889103 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.06.00710.1016/j.ijplas.2017.06.007 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.08.07610.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.08.076 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10501610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105016 ↗