Dynamic recrystallization-dependent damage modeling during hot forming
Source abstract
Abstract
Hot forming processes are extensively used to produce semi-finished and finished components. At elevated temperatures, dynamic recovery and recrystallization processes occur that enable large shape changes at low forming forces. In steel, non-metallic inclusions cannot be avoided during metallurgical processes. They may induce damage in the same way as at room temperature, but the softening of the matrix due to dynamic recrystallization may be used to control the initiation and progression of damage. Damage models do not take into account that dynamic recrystallization reduces the local stresses at the interface of matrix–inclusion. The purpose of the presented study is to analyze the interaction between dynamic recrystallization and damage initiation. Using representative volume elements, the influence of dynamic recrystallization on damage initiation is studied at different temperatures, strain rates, and stress states. Based on this study, a damage model is devised that couples dynamic recrystallization and damage on the macro level and hence can be used in macroscopic process simulations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Design and Manufacturing, Brandenburg University of Technology, Cottbus, Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/1757-899X/257/1/01204710.1088/1757-899X/257/1/012047 ↗
2. Anonymous (2010) Defining the constitutive response of cohesive elements using a traction – Separation description. In: Abaqus Analysis User's Manual . 6.10 ed. Providence, RI: Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp.
3. 10.2355/isijinternational.32.35910.2355/isijinternational.32.359 ↗
4. 10.1051/metal/201705810.1051/metal/2017058 ↗
5. Diehl T (2005) Modeling surface-bonded structures with ABAQUS cohesive elements: Beam-type solutions. In: ABAQUS user's conference .
6. 10.1007/s11661-998-0331-710.1007/s11661-998-0331-7 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.04.03310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.04.033 ↗
8. 10.1243/03093247JSA23010.1243/03093247JSA230 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00239-X10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00239-X ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.04410.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.044 ↗
11. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.622-623.15510.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.622-623.155 ↗
12. Lin J · Engineering Transactions · 2007 · 55 · 43
13. 10.1016/S0927-0256(01)00149-510.1016/S0927-0256(01)00149-5 ↗
14. Luo C and Stahlberg U (1998) FEM simulation of void formation close to an inclusion in a uniform matrix during plastic deformation. In: NUMIFORM 1998, sixth international conference on numerical methods in industrial forming processes , Netherlands, 22–25 June 1998, pp. 379–384.
15. Malkiewicz T · Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute · 1963 · 201 · 33
16. 10.1007/s12666-016-0831-x10.1007/s12666-016-0831-x ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.01.03010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.01.030 ↗
18. 10.1088/0965-0393/22/7/07500110.1088/0965-0393/22/7/075001 ↗
19. Rudnik S · Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute · 1966 · 204 · 374
20. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.04.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2017.04.002 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.02510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.025 ↗
22. 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
23. 10.1016/0924-0136(96)02313-810.1016/0924-0136(96)02313-8 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.09610.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.096 ↗
25. Zhang G-l, Zhao T-Z and Zhang S-H (2013) Finite element analysis of inclusion effects on high strength steel cord wire drawing. In: The 11th international conference on numerical methods in industrial forming processes: NUMIFORM 2013 , Shenyang, China, 6–10 July. AIP, pp. 1131–1136.10.1063/1.4806963 ↗