A modified accumulation damage algorithm for predicting corrosion fatigue life by considering load interaction for aluminum alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Fatigue tests were conducted on centrally notched aluminum alloys 2524-T3 and 7050-T7451 under constant-amplitude and actual random spectrum loading in dry air and in 3.5% NaCl sodium chloride solution, and fatigue damage mechanisms under the load interaction and the corrosion effect on fatigue crack initiation and propagation were deduced from fractographic analysis. Pure and corrosion fatigue lives under actual random spectrum load history were modelled based on a modified accumulation damage algorithm accounting for the load interaction. More reasonable predictions were achieved from the modified algorithm proposed in the paper than from the Palmgren–Miner rule.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM (2010) Standard practice for conducting force controlled constant amplitude axial fatigue tests of metallic materials. ASTM E466-07, West Conshohocken, PA.
2. ASTM (2014) Standard practice for statistical analysis of linear or linearized stress-life ( S − N ) and strain-life ( ɛ − N ) fatigue data. ASTM E739-10, West Conshohocken, PA.
3. 10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00091-410.1016/S0142-1123(03)00091-4 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.01.02010.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.01.020 ↗
5. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/RC.1410.4028/www.scientific.net/RC.14 ↗
6. Chang JB, Szamossi M and Liu KW (1981) Random spectrum fatigue crack life predictions with or without considering load interactions. In: Chang JB and Hudson CM (eds) Methods and Models for Predicting Fatigue Crack Growth under Random Loading, ASTM STP 748 . Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 115–132.10.1520/STP28337S ↗
7. 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.08.02210.1016/j.corsci.2014.08.022 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.01.01010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.01.010 ↗
9. Corten HT and Dolan TJ (1956) Cumulative Fatigue Damage. In: Corten HT
10. (ed) International conference on fatigue of metals, London, UK, 10-14 September 1956, pp. 235-246. London: Institution of Mechanical Engineers and American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
11. 10.1520/STP26680S10.1520/STP26680S ↗
12. Federal Aviation Association (2006) Metallic materials properties development and standardization. MMPDS-03, USA.
13. Fu Y, Xiong JJ and Shenoi RA (2017) New models for depicting corrosion fatigue behaviour and calendar life of metallic structural component. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 231(2).10.1177/0954406216637633 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.03.02010.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.03.020 ↗
15. Goodman J · 1919
16. Guo HQ · Journal of Materials Engineering · 1995 · 42
17. 10.1111/ffe.1255310.1111/ffe.12553 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.corsci.2004.10.00410.1016/j.corsci.2004.10.004 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.03.01610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.03.016 ↗
20. 10.1177/105678951452407510.1177/1056789514524075 ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0005351910.1007/BF00053519 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.09.01810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.09.018 ↗
23. 10.1243/03093247V12426210.1243/03093247V124262 ↗
24. Miner MA · Journal of Applied Mechanics · 1945 · 67 · 59
25. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.09.00510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.09.005 ↗
26. Newman JC (1981) A crack-closure model for predicting fatigue crack growth under aircraft spectrum loading. In: Chang JB and Hudson CM (eds) Methods and Models for Predicting Fatigue Crack Growth under Random Loading , ASTM STP 748. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 53–84.10.1520/STP28334S ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.00710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.007 ↗
28. 10.1177/105678951562091010.1177/1056789515620910 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.01.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.01.004 ↗
30. PRC National Standard (2008) Wrought aluminium and aluminium alloys—Chemical composition limits. GB/T 3190-2008, China.
31. 10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00069-310.1016/S0142-1123(98)00069-3 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.05.02010.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.05.020 ↗
33. 10.1007/s11665-009-9379-910.1007/s11665-009-9379-9 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.01010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.010 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.10.00710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.10.007 ↗
36. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01630.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01630.x ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.10.01510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.10.015 ↗
38. 10.1115/1.342536210.1115/1.3425362 ↗
39. Willenborg J, Engle RM and Wood HA (1971) A crack growth retardation model using an effective stress intensity concept. AFFDL, TM-71-1-FBR.10.21236/ADA956517 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.01810.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.018 ↗
41. 10.1007/978-0-85729-218-610.1007/978-0-85729-218-6 ↗
42. 10.1243/030932405X3101910.1243/030932405X31019 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.12.02910.1016/j.corsci.2011.12.029 ↗
44. 10.1111/ffe.1256910.1111/ffe.12569 ↗
45. 10.1177/105678951455304210.1177/1056789514553042 ↗