journal article·2014-11

Failure modelling in metal forming by means of an anisotropic hyperelastic-plasticity model with damage

Ivaylo N Vladimirov, Michael P Pietryga, Yalin Kiliclar, Vivian Tini, Stefanie Reese

Publisher page

Abstract

In metal forming, formability is limited by the evolution of ductile damage in the work piece. The accurate prediction of material failure requires, in addition to the description of anisotropic plasticity, the inclusion of damage in the finite element simulation. This paper discusses the application of an anisotropic hyperelastic-plasticity model with isotropic damage to the numerical simulation of fracture limits in metal forming. The model incorporates plastic anisotropy, nonlinear kinematic and isotropic hardening and ductile damage. The constitutive equations of the proposed model are numerically integrated both implicitly and explicitly, and the model is implemented as a user material subroutine UMAT in the commercial solvers ABAQUS/Standard and LS-DYNA, respectively. The numerical examples investigate the potential of the constitutive framework regarding the prediction of failure in metal forming processes such as, e.g. cross-die deep drawing. In particular, simulations of the Nakazima stretching test with varying specimen geometry are utilized to simulate the forming limit diagram at fracture and the numerical results are compared to experimental data for aluminium alloy sheets.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Applied Mechanics, RWTH Aachen University, Germany

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0022-5096(86)90005-010.1016/0022-5096(86)90005-0 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.01.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2010.01.008 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.004 ↗
4. 10.1016/0890-6955(94)E0035-H10.1016/0890-6955(94)E0035-H ↗
5. 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00578-710.1016/S0924-0136(01)00578-7 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00114-610.1016/S0749-6419(02)00114-6 ↗
7. 10.1115/1.317366110.1115/1.3173661 ↗
8. 10.1016/0020-7403(90)90148-C10.1016/0020-7403(90)90148-C ↗
9. Cockroft MG · Journal Institute of Metals · 1968 · 96 · 33
10. 10.1063/1.171193710.1063/1.1711937 ↗
11. 10.1108/eb02384210.1108/eb023842 ↗
12. 10.1002/nme.162035030710.1002/nme.1620350307 ↗
13. 10.3184/096034007X20758910.3184/096034007X207589 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61038-510.1016/S0007-8506(07)61038-5 ↗
15. 10.1115/1.344340110.1115/1.3443401 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.12.01310.1016/j.ijplas.2008.12.013 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00587-910.1016/S0924-0136(03)00587-9 ↗
18. 10.1098/rspa.1948.004510.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0020-7403(98)00070-810.1016/S0020-7403(98)00070-8 ↗
20. 10.1007/BF0054207610.1007/BF00542076 ↗
21. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-910.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
22. Kachanov LM · Isv Akad Nauk SSR Otd Tekh Nauk (in Russian) · 1958 · 8 · 26
23. 10.3166/ijfp.8.271-28910.3166/ijfp.8.271-289 ↗
24. Kiliclar Y, Demir OK, Vladimirov IN, et al. (2012) Combined simulation of quasi-static deep drawing and electromagnetic forming by means of a coupled damageviscoplasticity model at finite strains. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on high speed forming 2012, ICHSF , Dortmund, Germany, 24–26 April 2012, pp.325–334.
25. 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00694-X10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00694-X ↗
26. 10.1115/1.322577510.1115/1.3225775 ↗
27. 10.1007/978-3-662-02761-510.1007/978-3-662-02761-5 ↗
28. Lemaitre J · 1995
29. 10.1016/S0749-6419(99)00038-810.1016/S0749-6419(99)00038-8 ↗
30. 10.1016/0045-7825(96)01019-510.1016/0045-7825(96)01019-5 ↗
31. Nakazima K, Kikuma T and Hasuka K (1968) Yawata Technology Report 264: 8517–8530.
32. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.09.11010.1016/j.msea.2006.09.110 ↗
33. 10.1007/BF0302746710.1007/BF03027467 ↗
34. 10.1002/nme.162025011810.1002/nme.1620250118 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.01.01410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.01.014 ↗
36. 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00247-410.1016/S1359-6454(97)00247-4 ↗
37. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961015)39:19<3391::AID-NME7>3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961015)39:19<3391::AID-NME7>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
38. Rabotnov JR · 1969
39. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.02310.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.023 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.finel.2010.02.00210.1016/j.finel.2010.02.002 ↗
41. 10.1177/105678950934368810.1177/1056789509343688 ↗
42. 10.1177/10567895000090030210.1177/105678950000900302 ↗
43. 10.1007/BF0104705310.1007/BF01047053 ↗
44. 10.1002/cnm.164010120610.1002/cnm.1640101206 ↗
45. 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00275-710.1016/S0924-0136(99)00275-7 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0020-7403(99)00018-110.1016/S0020-7403(99)00018-1 ↗
47. 10.1002/nme.223410.1002/nme.2234 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.09.02710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.09.027 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.09.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2009.09.008 ↗
50. 10.1007/s12289-011-1038-710.1007/s12289-011-1038-7 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.02.00410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.02.004 ↗
52. Voce E · Journal of Institute of Metals · 1948 · 74 · 537
53. 10.1016/0020-7225(92)90059-P10.1016/0020-7225(92)90059-P ↗
54. 10.1016/0924-0136(92)90177-T10.1016/0924-0136(92)90177-T ↗