Development of a non-local approach for life prediction of notched specimen considering stress/strain gradient and elastic-plastic fatigue damage
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, a non-local approach is developed for the fatigue life prediction of notched specimens, considering stress/strain gradient and elastic-plastic fatigue damage. The damage coupled constitutive models are presented to model the mechanical behavior of material. The critical plane method and triaxiality factor are employed to determine the location of the couple point. The gradient values of mechanical quantities are then computed, and the modified coefficients in damage models are acquired. The numerical simulations are implemented to compute the damage evolution process and predict fatigue life. Meanwhile, the coupling effects between stress field and damage field are considered. The predicted results are verified by experimental data, and also compared with the local method. Finally, the influence of stress concentration factor, shape of notch, and cyclic variation of stress/strain gradient are further investigated.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Numerical methods in engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
Innovation and Application Center, China Academy of Aerospace Aerodynamics, Beijing, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.11.00210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.11.002 ↗
2. 10.1177/105678952199162010.1177/1056789521991620 ↗
3. 10.1016/0020-7225(92)90141-310.1016/0020-7225(92)90141-3 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.triboint.2016.07.02810.1016/j.triboint.2016.07.028 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00191-810.1016/S0142-1123(01)00191-8 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.01810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.018 ↗
7. 10.1115/1.317367410.1115/1.3173674 ↗
8. 10.1111/ffe.1323210.1111/ffe.13232 ↗
9. 10.1016/0749-6419(91)90050-910.1016/0749-6419(91)90050-9 ↗
10. 10.1177/105678952093962210.1177/1056789520939622 ↗
11. Crossland B (1956) Effect of large hydrostatic pressures on the torsional fatigue strength of an alloy steel. In: Proceedings of the international conference on fatigue of metals. London: Institution of Mechanical Engineers, pp.138–149.
12. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.06.03210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.06.032 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.01910.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.019 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.03.00510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.03.005 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00010-410.1016/S0142-1123(00)00010-4 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.09.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.09.009 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2016.02.00510.1016/j.tafmec.2016.02.005 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.06.01210.1016/j.tafmec.2017.06.012 ↗
20. 10.1177/105678951877517310.1177/1056789518775173 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10541910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105419 ↗
22. Lemaitre J, Desmorat R (2005) Engineering Damage Mechanics: Ductile, Creep, Fatigue and Brittle Failures. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
23. Lemaitre J · 1994
24. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.05.04110.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.05.041 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.03.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.03.008 ↗
26. 10.1111/ffe.1319510.1111/ffe.13195 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.06.02710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.06.027 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00250-X10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00250-X ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10530210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105302 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10563110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105631 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10600010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106000 ↗
32. 10.1177/105678951879520410.1177/1056789518795204 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.03.00310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.03.003 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.08.01810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.08.018 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0142-1123(96)00064-310.1016/S0142-1123(96)00064-3 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.01010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.010 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00028-010.1016/S0045-7825(98)00028-0 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.12.01310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.12.013 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.10.00210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.10.002 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.04.02810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.04.028 ↗
41. 10.1111/ffe.1229910.1111/ffe.12299 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10552010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105520 ↗
43. Smith RN · Journal of Material · 1970 · 5 · 767
44. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00462.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00462.x ↗
45. 10.1007/BF0094272210.1007/BF00942722 ↗
46. 10.1111/ffe.1263110.1111/ffe.12631 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.05.01810.1016/j.tafmec.2017.05.018 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.04.00710.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.04.007 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.06.01310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.06.013 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00002-510.1016/S0142-1123(00)00002-5 ↗
51. Wu XR · 1998
52. 10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00005-X10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00005-X ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10535010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105350 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.09.01810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.09.018 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.09.01610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.09.016 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.04.01110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.04.011 ↗