Non-destructive inspection of initial defects of PA6.6-GF50/aluminum self-piercing riveted joints and damage monitoring under mechanical static loading
Source abstract
Abstract
A self-piercing riveting process is used to join a thermoplastic composite sheet of PA6.6-GF50 with an aluminum alloy sheet 5182 O. Two shapes of self-piercing rivet are tested: the countersunk rivet and the button head rivet. Non-destructive inspections by pulse thermography and post-mortem cross-section observations are made to assess the damage that might have occurred during the rivet piercing process. The manufacturing defects are characterized and the possible causes for their emergence are explained. Then, single-lap joint tests were carried out to determine the best joint in terms of its mechanical strength. These tests were also instrumented by various monitoring techniques such as passive thermography, digital image correlation, and acoustic emission to clarify the joint damaging behavior. Non-destructive inspections by pulse thermography are finally correlated with the thermal fields acquired by passive thermography during the mechanical test to improve the understanding of the damage mechanisms and their criticality.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Renault, Guyancourt, France
Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes, Université de Lyon, Saint-Etienne, France
Composite Materials and Structures Department, ONERA, Châtillon, France
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00166-410.1016/S1359-835X(00)00166-4 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.02.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2004.02.007 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.02610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.026 ↗
4. 10.3166/qirt.5.45-6810.3166/qirt.5.45-68 ↗
5. Chen O · NDT & E International · 1992 · 8 · 869
6. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.08.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.08.010 ↗
7. 10.1007/s12289-010-0947-110.1007/s12289-010-0947-1 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.03610.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.036 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.00810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.008 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00170-008-1690-310.1007/s00170-008-1690-3 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.10.01710.1016/j.compstruct.2010.10.017 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.10.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.10.004 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.07110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.071 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.001 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.008 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.09.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2012.09.007 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00061-510.1016/S1359-835X(99)00061-5 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.12910.1016/j.procir.2014.06.129 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.08.00310.1016/j.matdes.2006.08.003 ↗
20. Roche JM · Material Evaluation · 2014 · 72 · 73
21. Roche JM, Passilly F, Leroy FH, et al. (2015) Thermal non-destructive characterization and in situ damage monitoring of a composite suspension wishbone. In: Groves R, Huntley J and Bhattacharya N (eds) Proc. of the Photomechanics 2015 conference . Delft: TU Delft.
22. 10.1117/12.42103210.1117/12.421032 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.02610.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.026 ↗
24. 10.1007/s12289-010-0937-310.1007/s12289-010-0937-3 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.04.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2012.04.027 ↗
26. US Mil-Hdbk 17A (1994) Chapter 7: Structural element characterization.