Prediction of ductile fracture for Al6016-T4 with a ductile fracture criterion: Experiment and simulation
Source abstract
Abstract
The key point in this paper is the prediction of the onset of ductile fracture with a newly proposed ductile fracture criterion in various stress state ranging from shear to uniaxial tension. A series of tension tests with different material orientations are carried out up to fracture. The anisotropic Drucker yield function with an isotropic hardening law is identified to describe the elastic–plastic behaviors of Al6016-T4 aluminum alloy. The uncoupled ductile fracture criterion is calibrated and then utilized to construct the fracture locus of Al6016-T4, which is implemented into the ABAQUS/Explicit to validate the prediction of ductile fracture criterion by comparing experimental results to numerical ones. The validation demonstrates that the ductile fracture criterion can accurately predict the onset of ductile fracture for Al6016-T4 in medium stress triaxiality ranging from 0.1 to 0.44 where most ductile fracture occurs in sheet metal forming.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Equipment and Manufacturing Technology, School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Shaanxi, China
Funding
"Young Talent Support Plan" of Xi'an Jiaotong University · Guangdong National Natural Science Foundation
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10704-009-9422-810.1007/s10704-009-9422-8 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.00610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.01110.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.011 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11340-015-0009-110.1007/s11340-015-0009-1 ↗
5. 10.1177/105678951770403010.1177/1056789517704030 ↗
6. Brozzo P, DeLuca B and Rendina R (1972) A new method for the prediction of formability in metal sheets. In: Proceedings of the 7th biennial conference of the international deep drawing research group on sheet metal forming and formability , Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 9–13 October 1972.
7. Chen CC · Journal of Engineering for Industry · 1977 · 101 · 36
8. Cockcroft MG · Journal of the Institute of Metals · 1968 · 96 · 33
9. 10.1115/1.401000910.1115/1.4010009 ↗
10. 10.1115/1.344340110.1115/1.3443401 ↗
11. Hora P and Tong L (1994) Prediction methods for ductile sheet metal failure using FE simulation. In: Proceedings of the IDDRG congress , Lisbon, Portugal, 16–17 May 1994, pp.363–375.
12. 10.1177/105678951769587210.1177/1056789517695872 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.10.00710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.10.007 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0894-9166(14)60008-210.1016/S0894-9166(14)60008-2 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.00110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.001 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.01610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.016 ↗
17. 10.1007/s12540-013-4009-310.1007/s12540-013-4009-3 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.10.01210.1016/j.ijplas.2017.10.012 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.08.00610.1016/j.ijplas.2013.08.006 ↗
20. 10.1115/1.360120410.1115/1.3601204 ↗
21. 10.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-510.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-5 ↗
22. 10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-710.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
23. 10.1177/105678951770153110.1177/1056789517701531 ↗
24. 10.1016/0022-5096(52)90002-110.1016/0022-5096(52)90002-1 ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0001568610.1007/BF00015686 ↗
26. 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.12.02610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.12.026 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.07.02210.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.07.022 ↗
29. 10.1177/105678951454657810.1177/1056789514546578 ↗
30. 10.1177/105678951772856310.1177/1056789517728563 ↗