A continuum damage mechanics-based approach for the high cycle fatigue behavior of metallic polycrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
Polycrystalline elasto-plasticity models provide a general framework for investigating the effect of microstructural heterogeneities (e.g. grains, inclusions, pores) on the high cycle fatigue behavior of metallic materials. In this work, continuum damage mechanics is used to construct a set of constitutive relations to describe the progressive degradation of certain mechanical properties at the grain scale. The damage is considered to be coupled with the elastic behavior of the material. Special care is taken to include the anisotropic aspect of fatigue damage and the effect of intragranular internal stresses. The constitutive relations are then implemented within a self-consistent model to evaluate intergranular interactions. Finally, the model is used to investigate the high cycle fatigue behavior of polycrystalline copper. It is shown that the influence of certain loading conditions on the high cycle behavior is correctly reproduced. Specifically, the application of a mean shear stress does not result in an increase in damage; however, a mean normal stress is damaging. That is, a decrease in the fatigue resistance is predicted when the mean normal stress is increased.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Arts et Métiers ParisTech, LAMPA, Angers, France
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/10567895940030030110.1177/105678959400300301 ↗
2. Agbessi K (2013) Approches expérimentales et multi-échelles des processus d’amorçage des fissures de fatigue sous chargements complexes . PhD Thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers.
3. 10.1016/0001-6160(85)90188-910.1016/0001-6160(85)90188-9 ↗
4. Bornert M · 2001
5. 10.1080/1478643630820907810.1080/14786436308209078 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.09.00710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.09.007 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.10.00510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.10.005 ↗
8. Crossland B (1956) Effect of large hydrostatic pressures on the torsional fatigue strength of an alloy steel. In: Proceedings of the international conference on fatigue of metals . London: Institution of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 138–149.
9. Dang Van K · Sciences Techniques Armement · 1973 · 3 · 47
10. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00196-710.1016/S1359-6454(98)00196-7 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2010.01.00710.1016/j.mechmat.2010.01.007 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x ↗
13. Grosskreutz JC · 1975
14. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.09.01410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.09.014 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.04.00310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.04.003 ↗
16. Hershey AV · Journal of Applied Mechanics · 1954 · 21 · 23610.1115/1.4010899 ↗
17. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01197.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01197.x ↗
18. Klesnil M · Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute · 1965 · 203 · 1043
19. 10.1007/BF0133794810.1007/BF01337948 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01004-810.1016/S0921-5093(01)01004-8 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00074-210.1016/S0749-6419(01)00074-2 ↗
22. 10.1080/1478643660821898910.1080/14786436608218989 ↗
23. 10.1007/978-3-642-18255-610.1007/978-3-642-18255-6 ↗
24. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.157-162.182110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.157-162.1821 ↗
25. Li Y · Part 1. Single crystals fatigued at intermediate strain amplitude. Materials Science and Engineering A · 1994 · 186 · 65
26. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.07.00310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.07.003 ↗
27. 10.1002/pssb.1968027021210.1002/pssb.19680270212 ↗
28. 10.1016/0142-1123(89)90048-010.1016/0142-1123(89)90048-0 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01132-710.1016/S0921-5093(01)01132-7 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.09.01410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.09.014 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.86610.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.866 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.08.01110.1016/j.ijplas.2014.08.011 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.67510.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.675 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.00310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.003 ↗
35. 10.1016/0956-7151(94)90287-910.1016/0956-7151(94)90287-9 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.crme.2005.12.00210.1016/j.crme.2005.12.002 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.02.04610.1016/j.msea.2013.02.046 ↗
38. 10.1520/STP35885S10.1520/STP35885S ↗
39. 10.1016/0001-6160(83)90007-X10.1016/0001-6160(83)90007-X ↗
40. 10.1002/pssa.221104010810.1002/pssa.2211040108 ↗
41. Nemat-Nasser S · 1998
42. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01978-X10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01978-X ↗
43. 10.1016/0956-7151(90)90194-L10.1016/0956-7151(90)90194-L ↗
44. 10.5545/sv-jme.2013.160010.5545/sv-jme.2013.1600 ↗
45. 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1955_169_015_0210.1243/PIME_PROC_1955_169_015_02 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.03.02110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.03.021 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.07.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2007.07.004 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.09.11910.1016/j.msea.2015.09.119 ↗
49. Sines G · 1959 · 14
50. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.01810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.018 ↗
51. 10.1080/0141861820823693210.1080/01418618208236932 ↗
52. 10.1080/1478643560823808610.1080/14786435608238086 ↗
53. 10.1177/105678951665024710.1177/1056789516650247 ↗