Mesoscale damage modelling of concrete by using image-based scaled boundary finite element method
Source abstract
Abstract
As a thin layer surrounding aggregates, the interfacial transition zone (ITZ) has a significant influence on the mechanical performance of concrete, a large number of small elements is required to discretize the ITZ and its vicinity owing to its small thickness. In this contribution, the mesostructure of concrete is explicitly built by a novel method named improved random walking algorithm (IRWA), with which the grading, content, shape of aggregates and the thickness of ITZs, can be conveniently controlled by users, and high volume fraction of aggregate and remarkable efficiency can be achieved. In the framework of the scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM), the image-based quadtree decomposition is employed to automatically generate the multi-level mesh for the concrete composites, with no trouble in dealing with hanging nodes or the dramatically changing element size in the vicinity of the material interface. The nonlocal damage model in integral format is extended to simulate progressive damage of concrete at mesoscale with good mesh independence. Four benchmarks are modelled to demonstrate the performance of the proposed approach, and the effects of model parameters on the structural responses are also discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
Key Laboratory of Impact and Safety Engineering (Ningbo University), Ministry of Education, Ningbo, China
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.06.00810.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.06.008 ↗
2. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
3. 10.1002/nag.236310.1002/nag.2363 ↗
4. 10.1002/978111837593810.1002/9781118375938 ↗
5. 10.1016/0008-8846(94)90022-110.1016/0008-8846(94)90022-1 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0247285310.1007/BF02472853 ↗
7. 10.1016/0045-7949(94)00501-S10.1016/0045-7949(94)00501-S ↗
8. 10.1007/s00466-002-0314-210.1007/s00466-002-0314-2 ↗
9. 10.1177/105678951351602810.1177/1056789513516028 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00083-210.1016/S0013-7944(01)00083-2 ↗
11. 10.1007/BF0028893310.1007/BF00288933 ↗
12. 10.1061/TACEAT.000197910.1061/TACEAT.0001979 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0045-7825(98)80011-X10.1016/S0045-7825(98)80011-X ↗
14. 10.1007/s10704-012-9694-210.1007/s10704-012-9694-2 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.01.00910.1016/j.cemconres.2014.01.009 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.02.02110.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.02.021 ↗
17. 10.1002/nme.583210.1002/nme.5832 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.08.09910.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.08.099 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.00210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.002 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00466-016-1309-810.1007/s00466-016-1309-8 ↗
21. 10.1080/12795119.2004.969262510.1080/12795119.2004.9692625 ↗
22. 10.1002/nag.36410.1002/nag.364 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:12(2764)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:12(2764) ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.07.00110.1016/j.cemconres.2010.07.001 ↗
25. Kozicki J · Archives of Mechanics · 2007 · 59 · 365
26. 10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00023-710.1016/S0013-7944(03)00023-7 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cma.2011.01.00810.1016/j.cma.2011.01.008 ↗
28. Long Y · Engineering Mechanics · 2008 · 25 · 80
29. 10.1002/nme.76110.1002/nme.761 ↗
30. 10.1016/0020-7683(96)00015-710.1016/0020-7683(96)00015-7 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.01611210.1103/PhysRevE.78.016112 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.08.01010.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.08.010 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.08310.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.083 ↗
34. 10.1002/nme.428410.1002/nme.4284 ↗
35. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(1998100)3:4<323::AID-CFM51>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(1998100)3:4<323::AID-CFM51>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
36. 10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00087-710.1016/S0020-7683(01)00087-7 ↗
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:10(1512)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:10(1512) ↗
38. Qian Z · 2012
39. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.04410.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.044 ↗
40. 10.1002/nme.530410.1002/nme.5304 ↗
41. Shao G, Ding S (2017) Concrete mesoscopic model and numerical simulation based on quadtree mesh refinement technology. In International Conference on Advances in Computational Mechanics . 941–954. Springer, Singapore.10.1007/978-981-10-7149-2_66 ↗
42. 10.1111/str.1206410.1111/str.12064 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.12.01510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.12.015 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00021-210.1016/S0045-7825(97)00021-2 ↗
45. 10.1177/105678951769091510.1177/1056789517690915 ↗
46. 10.1007/s10035-018-0862-610.1007/s10035-018-0862-6 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2010.02.00810.1016/j.euromechsol.2010.02.008 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10697410.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106974 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.probengmech.2005.11.00210.1016/j.probengmech.2005.11.002 ↗
50. 10.1177/105678950809754610.1177/1056789508097546 ↗
51. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00029-910.1016/S0020-7683(00)00029-9 ↗
52. 10.1002/nag.36210.1002/nag.362 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.finel.2005.11.00810.1016/j.finel.2005.11.008 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jmps.2015.05.01910.1016/j.jmps.2015.05.019 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.02.00410.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.02.004 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.22910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.229 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.06.00810.1016/j.compstruc.2018.06.008 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2018.10.00610.1016/j.enganabound.2018.10.006 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.06.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2017.06.015 ↗
60. 10.1680/macr.2005.57.7.39710.1680/macr.2005.57.7.397 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.07.00910.1016/j.compstruc.2017.07.009 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.04.01310.1016/j.compstruc.2008.04.013 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.02.01010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.02.010 ↗