Parameter estimation of an anisotropic damage model for concrete using genetic algorithms
Source abstract
Abstract
This article presents an anisotropic damage model for concrete that couples between elasticity and continuum damage mechanics. The formulation of constitutive model is based on the elastic strain energy in the framework of irreversible thermodynamics. The thermodynamic free energy is represented as a scalar function of elastic strain and damage tensors and used to derive the constitutive law and thermodynamic conjugate force of damage that is used to derive the dissipation potential. The damage evolution law is governed by the normality rule. The formulation of elastic strain energy of damaged material is capable of modeling the concrete anisotropic behavior under different loadings without decoupling the stress or damage release rate. A series of unknown parameters in the model formulation was used to control the constitutive behavior and damage surface. A Genetic algorithm FORTRAN subroutine is used to estimate these parameters based on the coupling between the constitutive and damage evolution equations. The performance of the damage model is verified with the experimental data from the literature. The model has shown a good agreement with the experimental results. It describes the anisotropy induced by the crack development within the concrete.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Numerical methods in engineering · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mining and Nuclear Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, MO, USA
College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, AL, USA
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/nag.93310.1002/nag.933 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0020-7403(03)00051-110.1016/S0020-7403(03)00051-1 ↗
3. Ananiev S, Ožbolt J (2004) Plastic-damage model for concrete in principal directions. In: Li V, Leung CKY, William KJ, (eds) Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures Vol 1: 271–278.
4. Boudon-Cussac D, Burr A, Hild F (1998) Damage mechanics in engineering materials. In: Voyiadjis G (ed.) On the Continuum Description of Damage in Fiber-reinforced Composites, Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 303–320.
5. 10.1007/PL0002010210.1007/PL00020102 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00044-410.1016/S0020-7683(98)00044-4 ↗
7. Chaboche JL (1978) Description thermodynamique et phénoménologique de la viscoplasticité cyclique avec endommagement. PhD Thesis Univ. Paris VI.
8. 10.1177/10567895920010020110.1177/105678959200100201 ↗
9. 10.1177/10567895950040010210.1177/105678959500400102 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.01.00210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.01.002 ↗
11. 10.1177/10567895950040030410.1177/105678959500400304 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0003489510.1007/BF00034895 ↗
13. 10.1177/105678950606494010.1177/1056789506064940 ↗
14. Cordebois J, Sidoroff F (1982) Anisotropic damage in elasticity and plasticity. Journal of Theoretical And Applied Mechanics (special edition). 45–60. (in French).
15. 10.1177/105678950706954110.1177/1056789507069541 ↗
16. Dragon A, Halm D (1998) A mesocrack damage and friction coupled model for brittle materials. Journal of Applied Mechanics 46: 321–336.
17. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.11.01210.1016/j.commatsci.2008.11.012 ↗
18. Habraken AM, Charles JF, Cescotto S (1998) Calibration and validation of an anisotropic elasto-plastic damage model for sheet metal forming. Journal of Applied Mechanics 46: 401–420.
19. Haupt RL, Haupt SE (2004) Practical Genetic Algorithms 2nd ed, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, pp. 211–212.
20. Hayakawa K, Murakami S (1998) Space of damage conjugate force and damage potential of elastic-plastic-damage materials. Journal of Applied Mechanics 46: 27–44.
21. 10.1106/XJBD-LPRG-NOJA-VGDJ10.1106/XJBD-LPRG-NOJA-VGDJ ↗
22. Hild F, Roux S (2006) Digital image correlation: From displacement measurement to identification of elastic properties – A review. Strain: An International Journal of Experimental Mechanics 42(2): 69–80.10.1111/j.1475-1305.2006.00258.x ↗
23. Kachanov L (1958) Time of the rupture process under creep conditions. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Otdelenie Tekhnicheskikh Nauk 8: 26–31.
24. 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.01.01510.1016/j.jmps.2011.01.015 ↗
25. 10.1115/1.316704410.1115/1.3167044 ↗
26. Ladeveze P and Lemaitre J (1984) Damage effective stress in quasi-unilateral material conditions. In: Proc. IUTAM Congr. 1984 Lyngby Denmark.
27. Lemaitre J, Chaboche JL (1978) Aspect phénoménologique de la rupture par endommagement. Journal of Applied Mechanics 2(3): 317–365. (in French).
28. 10.1017/CBO978113916797010.1017/CBO9781139167970 ↗
29. 10.1007/978-3-662-02761-510.1007/978-3-662-02761-5 ↗
30. Lemaitre J (2001) Handbook of Materials Behavior Models, Deformations of Materials, New York, NY: Academic Press.
31. 10.1016/0013-7944(94)90033-710.1016/0013-7944(94)90033-7 ↗
32. Mallat A (2007) Phénomènes de dégradation des ouvrages anciens, techniques et matériaux de réhabilitation. PhD Thesis, Ecole Centrale Paris, France (in French).
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:2(345)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:2(345) ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2003.12.00610.1016/j.ijplas.2003.12.006 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11340-009-9321-y10.1007/s11340-009-9321-y ↗
36. 10.1016/S0020-7403(97)87627-810.1016/S0020-7403(97)87627-8 ↗
37. Murakami S and Ohno N (1981) A continuum theory of creep and creep damage. In: Creep in Structures IUTAM 3rd Symposium (eds ARS Ponter DR Hayhurst) Leicester UK pp. 422–443. Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-81598-0_28 ↗
38. Murakami S (1987) Anisotropic damage theory and its application to creep crack growth analysis. In: 2nd Int. conf. on Constitutive Laws for Eng. Mater.: Theory and Applications. Tucson Publ. Elsevier pp. 107–114.
39. 10.1002/nag.62710.1002/nag.627 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.05.02910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.05.029 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2012.05.00310.1016/j.nonrwa.2012.05.003 ↗
42. 10.1115/1.317363010.1115/1.3173630 ↗
43. 10.1016/0167-6636(85)90007-910.1016/0167-6636(85)90007-9 ↗
44. 10.1016/0013-7944(96)00004-510.1016/0013-7944(96)00004-5 ↗
45. 10.1016/B978-012443341-0/50056-910.1016/B978-012443341-0/50056-9 ↗
46. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000026010.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000260 ↗
47. 10.1016/0029-5493(92)90094-C10.1016/0029-5493(92)90094-C ↗
48. Ramtani S (1990) Contribution à la modélisation du comportement multiaxial du béton endommagé avec description du caractère unilatéral. PhD Thesis Univ. Paris VI (in French).
49. 10.1016/S0920-4105(01)00124-310.1016/S0920-4105(01)00124-3 ↗
50. 10.1111/ffe.1211410.1111/ffe.12114 ↗
51. Skrzypek JJ, Ganczarski A (1999) Modeling of material damage and failure of structures. Series. Engineering Mechanics, Springer: VerlagVol. 11: 326.
52. 10.1016/S0927-0256(02)00400-710.1016/S0927-0256(02)00400-7 ↗
53. Taqieddin ZN, Voyiadjis GZ, Almasri AH (2012) Formulation and verification of a concrete model with strong coupling between isotropic damage and elastoplasticity and comparison to a weak coupling model. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 138(1): 187–209.
54. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.09.01710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.09.017 ↗
55. 10.1007/s10898-009-9503-210.1007/s10898-009-9503-2 ↗
56. 10.1016/0020-7225(90)90007-610.1016/0020-7225(90)90007-6 ↗
57. 10.1080/1537649060058278410.1080/15376490600582784 ↗
58. Voyiadjis GZ, Park T (1998) Kinematics of large elastoplastic damage deformation. Journal of Applied Mechanics 62(2): 450–458.
59. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.04.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2008.04.002 ↗
60. Wardeh MA (2012) Parameters identification of geomaterials constitutive model based on genetic algorithms as a method of optimization. Master Thesis Univ. Paris VI France pp. 1–68.
61. 10.1016/j.crme.2010.04.00510.1016/j.crme.2010.04.005 ↗