Unraveling mechanics of armchair and zigzag graphene nanoribbons
Source abstract
Abstract
The unraveling process of armchair and zigzag graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) was studied with molecular dynamics simulations using the Adaptive Intermolecular Reactive Empirical Bond Order Potential for carbon–carbon bond. Simulations were performed at 300°K, with GNR length and width varying from 2.5 nm to 15 nm in 2.5 nm increments. In these simulations, the unraveling of the GNRs was started from two positions; the corner or the middle of the top side. Force–displacement relationship was analyzed for the terminal atom of the unraveling chains. For armchair GNRs (AGNRs) that were unraveled from the corner, the force required for the onset of the unraveling is in the range of 4.279–5.045 eV/Å, and the observed failure force in the carbon chain is in the range of 5.553–5.963 eV/Å. Unraveling will not happen when AGNRs are unraveled from the middle, and zigzag GNRs (ZGNRs) are unraveled either from corner or middle. For the latter cases, the bond between the terminal atom and GNR sheet breaks under the stretching force, and only one carbon atom can be pulled out from the GNR sheet. The size effect of width and length on the unraveling process was also studied. Simulations show that size has a trivial effect on unraveling. Comparison between unraveling of AGNRs and ZGNRs indicates that AGNRs are perfect structure to produce Monatomic Carbon Chains, while ZGNRs are more stable and are good candidate for graphene nanodevices that are free from unraveling disintegration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Electronic Packaging Laboratory, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
Arkansas State University, State University, AR, USA
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nl070708c10.1021/nl070708c ↗
2. 10.1038/nmat306410.1038/nmat3064 ↗
3. 10.1088/0953-8984/14/4/31210.1088/0953-8984/14/4/312 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.22680110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.226801 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.05.09110.1016/j.carbon.2014.05.091 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.08541010.1103/PhysRevB.80.085410 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.489555310.1063/1.4895553 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.01610.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.016 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cpc.2014.08.00910.1016/j.cpc.2014.08.009 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.03010.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.030 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)NM.2153-5477.000010110.1061/(ASCE)NM.2153-5477.0000101 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.10.00610.1016/j.commatsci.2015.10.006 ↗
13. 10.1038/nmat184910.1038/nmat1849 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.physleta.2009.07.06710.1016/j.physleta.2009.07.067 ↗
15. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-510.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
16. Kim I, Chol-Su R and Yong-I (2016) A damage mechanics model of materials with voids and cracks. International Journal of Damage Mechanics 25.6: 773–796.10.1177/1056789516640037 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.115799610.1126/science.1157996 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0009-2614(96)01486-810.1016/S0009-2614(96)01486-8 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.01.04310.1016/j.actamat.2004.01.043 ↗
20. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/47/47570510.1088/0957-4484/18/47/475705 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1795410.1103/PhysRevB.54.17954 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.110289610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
23. Plimpton S, Crozier P and Thompson A (2007) LAMMPS-Large-Scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator . Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories, vol. 18.
24. 10.1088/0957-4484/21/26/26570210.1088/0957-4484/21/26/265702 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.05.02210.1016/j.commatsci.2009.05.022 ↗
26. 10.1115/1.400386610.1115/1.4003866 ↗
27. 10.1126/science.269.5230.155010.1126/science.269.5230.1550 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cplett.2013.02.03810.1016/j.cplett.2013.02.038 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.21680310.1103/PhysRevLett.97.216803 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.48120810.1063/1.481208 ↗
31. Voyiadjis GZ and Peter IK (2016) Elasticity of damaged graphene: A damage mechanics approach. International Journal of Damage Mechanics 25.8: 1184–1213.10.1177/1056789516656747 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.23340310.1103/PhysRevB.80.233403 ↗
33. Wei N, et al. (2015) Thermal conductivity of graphene kirigami: Ultralow and strain robustness. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1512.04635.10.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.043 ↗
34. 10.1126/science.115693610.1126/science.1156936 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0927-0256(97)00047-510.1016/S0927-0256(97)00047-5 ↗
36. Zhang J · International Journal of Damage Mechanics · 2016 · 26 · 28
37. Zhang J, Tarek R and Cemal B (2016b) The effects of vacancy defect on the fracture behaviors of zigzag graphene nanoribbons. International Journal of Damage Mechanics 1056789516671795.10.1177/1056789516671795 ↗
38. Zheng Y Hongfei Y and Hongwu Z (2016) Twin-induced template effect on the inelastic deformation of hierarchically nanotwinned copper under indentation and scratch. International Journal of Damage Mechanics 25.1: 56–68.10.1177/1056789515574123 ↗