journal article·2023-06Open access

A stress-state-dependent damage criterion for metals with plastic anisotropy

Michael Brünig, Sanjeev Koirala, Steffen Gerke

Abstract

The paper discusses the effect of stress state and of loading direction on the onset and evolution of damage in anisotropic ductile metals. A series of experiments with uniaxially and biaxially loaded specimens covering a wide range of stress states and different loading directions is used in combination with corresponding numerical simulations to develop damage criteria. The underlying continuum damage model is based on kinematic definition of damage tensors. The strain rate tensor is additively decomposed into elastic, plastic and damage parts. The anisotropic plastic behavior of the investigated aluminum alloy sheets is governed by the Hoffman yield condition taking into account the strength-differential effect revealed by uniaxial tension and compression tests. Based on this yield criterion generalized anisotropic stress invariants as well as the generalized stress triaxiality and the generalized Lode parameter are defined characterizing the stress state in the anisotropic ductile metal. A damage criterion formulated in terms of these anisotropic stress invariants is proposed and damage mode parameters allow adequate consideration and combination of different damage processes on the micro-level. At the onset of damage the anisotropic stress parameters are determined. With these experimental-numerical data the damage mode parameters are identified depending on stress state and loading direction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institut für Mechanik und Statik, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00109-410.1016/S0020-7683(03)00109-4 ↗
2. 10.1177/105678951663572910.1177/1056789516635729 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.02.00910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.02.009 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.004 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.004 ↗
6. 10.1016/0749-6419(91)90052-Z10.1016/0749-6419(91)90052-Z ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.00610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.003 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00466005045110.1007/s004660050451 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00114-610.1016/S0749-6419(02)00114-6 ↗
11. 10.1177/105678951663911910.1177/1056789516639119 ↗
12. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.784.3510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.784.35 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.05.02210.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.05.022 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.12.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2007.12.001 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.03.01210.1016/j.ijplas.2013.03.012 ↗
16. 10.3390/met1108121410.3390/met11081214 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.12.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2017.12.003 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10653110.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106531 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11340-021-00774-x10.1007/s11340-021-00774-x ↗
20. 10.1115/1.317366110.1115/1.3173661 ↗
21. 10.1016/0013-7944(87)90108-110.1016/0013-7944(87)90108-1 ↗
22. 10.1016/0022-5096(93)90067-P10.1016/0022-5096(93)90067-P ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.11.01210.1016/j.mechmat.2009.11.012 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.04.00610.1016/j.jmps.2011.04.006 ↗
25. 10.1177/105678950910191710.1177/1056789509101917 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.01.02710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.01.027 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10679510.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106795 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2003.11.01210.1016/j.ijplas.2003.11.012 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.07.01510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.07.015 ↗
30. Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proceedings of the Royal Society London 193: 281–297.10.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
31. 10.1177/00219983670010021010.1177/002199836700100210 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.10314910.1016/j.ijplas.2021.103149 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.10288210.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102882 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.02.02110.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.02.021 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.06.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2006.06.003 ↗
36. 10.1016/0045-7825(85)90026-X10.1016/0045-7825(85)90026-X ↗
37. 10.1016/S0749-6419(94)00024-710.1016/S0749-6419(94)00024-7 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.04.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2010.04.001 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.04.00110.1016/j.jcsr.2019.04.001 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.10.00710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.10.007 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.11.03410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.11.034 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.01610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.016 ↗
43. 10.1016/0924-0136(96)02399-010.1016/0924-0136(96)02399-0 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.00910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.009 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.04.01410.1016/j.ijplas.2016.04.014 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.08.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2015.08.004 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.04.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2019.04.004 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.03.02310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.03.023 ↗
49. 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90119-610.1016/0001-6160(84)90119-6 ↗
50. 10.1016/0001-6160(75)90205-910.1016/0001-6160(75)90205-9 ↗
51. 10.1007/BF0281788810.1007/BF02817888 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.02.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2009.02.003 ↗
53. 10.3390/jmmp402004310.3390/jmmp4020043 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10747610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107476 ↗