journal article·2022-07

A modified fatigue damage model considering loading sequence effect

Dongping Zhu, Wei Zhang, Zhixia Ding

Publisher page

Abstract

A modified fatigue damage model is proposed considering the loading sequence effect under variable amplitude loading conditions. The transition sequence is obtained from the counting sequence by an equivalent rainflow counting method and is used to provide the loading sequence information for fatigue damage accumulation prediction. Rainflow counting matrix and sequence transition matrix are formulated based on the rainflow counting sequence and the transition sequence. The relation between the two matrices and the original loading sequence is evaluated in detail. In the deterministic fatigue estimation, the rainflow counting matrix and the sequence transition matrix are integrated into the proposed modified damage model based on the linear damage rule. Mean stress transition is applied to the rainflow counting matrix for loading level effect. Existing experimental data are used to validate the fatigue damage estimation from the deterministic framework. In order to evaluate the fatigue under random loading conditions, the rainflow counting matrix and sequence transition matrix are mapped to one-dimensional exponential and Laplace distributions based on the stationary random process. Numerical simulation is conducted to validate the proposed mapping distributions. Meanwhile, the impact of the correlation length on the proposed distributions under stationary random loading sequence is investigated as well. Finally, with the given distributions of the rainflow counting matrix and sequence transition matrix, a reconstruction procedure is simulated and discussed for probabilistic fatigue estimation. The proposed model provides a sophisticated approximation to the original loading sequence with a sequence transition effect. The proposed modified fatigue damage model corrects the deficiencies of the linear damage rule with sufficient sequence information from the originally applied loading. Furthermore, the probabilistic fatigue estimation can evaluate the accumulated fatigue damages under a random loading process with the sequence transition effect.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.01710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.017 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00042-510.1016/S0143-974X(99)00042-5 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.07.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.07.009 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.02.02310.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.02.023 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.12.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.12.009 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10520910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105209 ↗
7. Basquin OH · Proceedings of the American Society for Testing and Materials · 1910 · 10 · 625
8. Brodtkorb PA · Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference · 2000 · 3 · 343
9. 10.1111/ffe.1277310.1111/ffe.12773 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10584210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105842 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.05.00310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.05.003 ↗
12. 10.1111/ffe.1278910.1111/ffe.12789 ↗
13. Corten HT, Dolan TJ (1956) Cumulative fatigue damage. In: Proceedings of the international conference on fatigue of metals, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, ASME and IME, pp.235–242. London.
14. 10.1111/ffe.1317510.1111/ffe.13175 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.05.00110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.05.001 ↗
16. 10.1177/105678951989006410.1177/1056789519890064 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00081-910.1016/S0142-1123(97)00081-9 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.14310.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.143 ↗
19. 10.3390/met1102020410.3390/met11020204 ↗
20. 10.3390/met909091910.3390/met9090919 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.10.01610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.10.016 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.03210.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.032 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.02.01110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.02.011 ↗
24. 10.1016/0142-1123(86)90053-810.1016/0142-1123(86)90053-8 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.02310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.023 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.07.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.07.009 ↗
27. 10.1177/105678951244963810.1177/1056789512449638 ↗
28. 10.1177/105678952199873710.1177/1056789521998737 ↗
29. 10.1177/105678951770153110.1177/1056789517701531 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.09.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.09.009 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.07.01810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.07.018 ↗
32. 10.1177/105678951452407510.1177/1056789514524075 ↗
33. 10.1007/BF0005351910.1007/BF00053519 ↗
34. Marco SM · Trans ASME · 1954 · 76 · 627
35. Marin J (1956) Interpretation of fatigue strengths for combined stresses. In: International conference on fatigue of metals, IMechE, pp.184–194. London
36. 10.1115/1.400945810.1115/1.4009458 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.02.01510.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.02.015 ↗
38. Palmgren AG · Vdi Z · 1924 · 68 · 339
39. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00760.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00760.x ↗
40. 10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00055-X10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00055-X ↗
41. 10.1177/105678951562091010.1177/1056789515620910 ↗
42. 10.3390/met806045610.3390/met8060456 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.02810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.028 ↗
44. 10.1016/0142-1123(87)90054-510.1016/0142-1123(87)90054-5 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.05.00610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.05.006 ↗
46. 10.1111/ffe.1301410.1111/ffe.13014 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.01110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.011 ↗
48. Starkey W · Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers · 1957 · 7910.1115/1.4013318 ↗
49. 10.1533/978184569583510.1533/9781845695835 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.11.01210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.11.012 ↗
51. 10.1080/15376490231722485110.1080/153764902317224851 ↗
52. Wöhler A · Z. Für Bauwes. Bd · 1858 · 8 · 641
53. 10.1177/105678951454422810.1177/1056789514544228 ↗
54. 10.25103/jestr.095.3010.25103/jestr.095.30 ↗
55. 10.1177/105678951455304210.1177/1056789514553042 ↗