journal article·2021-07

Size effect analysis of quasi-brittle fracture with localizing gradient damage model

Yi Zhang, Amit S. Shedbale, Yixiang Gan, Juhyuk Moon, Leong H. Poh

Publisher page

Abstract

The size effect of a quasi-brittle fracture is associated with the size of fracture process zone relative to the structural characteristic length. In numerical simulations using damage models, the nonlocal enhancement is commonly adopted to regularize the softening response. However, the conventional nonlocal enhancement, both integral and gradient approaches, induces a spurious spreading of damage zone. Since the evolution of fracture process zone cannot be captured well, the conventional nonlocal enhancement cannot predict the size effect phenomenon accurately. In this paper, the localizing gradient enhancement is adopted to avoid the spurious spreading of damage. Considering the three-point bend test of concrete beams, it is demonstrated that the dissipation profiles obtained with the localizing gradient enhancement compare well with those of reference meso-scale lattice models. With the correct damage evolution process, the localizing gradient enhancement is shown to capture the size effect phenomenon accurately for a series of geometrically similar concrete beams, using only a single set of material parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, India

School of Civil Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.04410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.044 ↗
2. 10.1177/105678950809754110.1177/1056789508097541 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.11055510.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110555 ↗
4. 10.1017/978131658514610.1017/9781316585146 ↗
5. Bažant ZP · 1997
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:2(78)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:2(78) ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.04.03810.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.04.038 ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:3(117)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:3(117) ↗
9. 10.1098/rspa.2015.075510.1098/rspa.2015.0755 ↗
10. 10.1007/s12046-012-0076-210.1007/s12046-012-0076-2 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0045-7825(98)80011-X10.1016/S0045-7825(98)80011-X ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.08.01210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.08.012 ↗
13. Giry C, Oliver-Leblond C, Ragueneau F, et al. (2014), Non-local model and global-local cracking analysis for the study of size effect. Computational Modelling of Concrete Structures. (EURO-C): 255.10.1201/b16645-28 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.07.01410.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.07.014 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.03.02310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.03.023 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.05.02310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.05.023 ↗
17. 10.1002/nag.218010.1002/nag.2180 ↗
18. 10.1002/nag.236310.1002/nag.2363 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.02.02910.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.02.029 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10704-013-9926-010.1007/s10704-013-9926-0 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.08.00710.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.08.007 ↗
22. 10.1080/12795119.2004.969262510.1080/12795119.2004.9692625 ↗
23. 10.1002/nag.36410.1002/nag.364 ↗
24. 10.14359/5168914910.14359/51689149 ↗
25. 10.2478/pomr-2019-003110.2478/pomr-2019-0031 ↗
26. Marzec I, Bobiński J (2019b) Size effect in concrete beams under bending–influence of the boundary layer and the numerical description of cracks. In: MATEC Web of Conferences , volume 262. EDP Sciences, p. 10008.10.1051/matecconf/201926210008 ↗
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:2(345)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:2(345) ↗
28. 10.1177/105678951987133410.1177/1056789519871334 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.02.00210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.02.002 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.05.02210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.05.022 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.02.01710.1016/j.mechmat.2019.02.017 ↗
32. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961015)39:19<3391::AID-NME7>3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961015)39:19<3391::AID-NME7>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
33. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(1998100)3:4<323::AID-CFM51>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(1998100)3:4<323::AID-CFM51>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
34. 10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00087-710.1016/S0020-7683(01)00087-7 ↗
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:10(1512)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:10(1512) ↗
36. 10.1002/nme.536410.1002/nme.5364 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.finel.2019.04.00110.1016/j.finel.2019.04.001 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.25210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.252 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.09.02010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.09.020 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jmps.2016.05.03510.1016/j.jmps.2016.05.035 ↗
41. 10.1177/105678950809754610.1177/1056789508097546 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.03310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.033 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.cma.2019.06.02910.1016/j.cma.2019.06.029 ↗
44. 10.1617/s11527-014-0426-010.1617/s11527-014-0426-0 ↗
45. Wosatko A, Pamin J, Winnicki A (2018) Numerical prediction of deterministic size effect in concrete bars and beams. In: Computational Modelling of Concrete Structures: Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Modelling of Concrete and Concrete Structures (EURO-C 2018), Bad Hofgastein, Austria . New York: CRC Press, pp. 447–456.10.1201/9781315182964-55 ↗
46. 10.1002/nme.632310.1002/nme.6323 ↗
47. 10.1002/nme.607410.1002/nme.6074 ↗