Flexural strength of delaminated composite plate – An experimental validation
Source abstract
Abstract
In the present work, the flexural strength of delaminated composite plate has been analysed numerically and compared with experimental results. For the numerical investigation, a general mathematical model of the laminated composite plate with and without delamination has been developed using two higher-order kinematic models. The desired governing equation is obtained using variational approach and discretised with the help of the isoparametric finite element steps. The flexural responses of the delaminated structure computed numerically through a generic in-house computer code developed in MATLAB environment. The consistency of the developed numerical models is checked and validated by comparing the bending responses with the available published results. Now, the experimental bending responses of both intact and delaminated composites are evaluated using three-point bend test and compared with numerical responses of the presently developed higher-order models. Finally, the effect of different materials and geometrical parameters including the size, location and position of the delamination on the bending behaviour of the laminated composite plate have been analysed numerically and discussed in detail.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, Odisha
DRDO Integration Centre, Panagarh, West Bengal, India
Advanced System Laboratory, DRDO, Hyderabad, India
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Bajaba NS · International Journal of Mechanic Systems Engineering · 2012 · 2 · 71
2. 10.1016/0020-7683(91)90200-Y10.1016/0020-7683(91)90200-Y ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.01.01310.1016/j.compstruc.2006.01.013 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2004.11.00510.1016/j.euromechsol.2004.11.005 ↗
5. 10.1177/105678951351319910.1177/1056789513513199 ↗
6. 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00069-010.1016/0266-3538(95)00069-0 ↗
7. 10.12989/scs.2016.20.1.20510.12989/scs.2016.20.1.205 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.03.00610.1016/j.matdes.2005.03.006 ↗
9. Jones RM · 1975
10. 10.1016/0045-7949(92)90436-410.1016/0045-7949(92)90436-4 ↗
11. 10.1016/0045-7949(84)90124-X10.1016/0045-7949(84)90124-X ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.09.00810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.09.008 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.07.01710.1016/j.compstruct.2009.07.017 ↗
14. 10.1142/S021945541250008310.1142/S0219455412500083 ↗
15. 10.1007/s00707-014-1200-710.1007/s00707-014-1200-7 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.07.00410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.07.004 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.finel.2012.01.00610.1016/j.finel.2012.01.006 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00466005022710.1007/s004660050227 ↗
19. 10.1177/00219983700040010210.1177/002199837000400102 ↗
20. 10.1007/BF0271009110.1007/BF02710091 ↗
21. 10.1201/b1240910.1201/b12409 ↗
22. 10.1177/105678951247038710.1177/1056789512470387 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tws.2014.09.00310.1016/j.tws.2014.09.003 ↗
24. 10.1177/105678951347895710.1177/1056789513478957 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.09.01810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.09.018 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.03.02710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.03.027 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apm.2013.11.06410.1016/j.apm.2013.11.064 ↗
28. 10.1177/105678950706077410.1177/1056789507060774 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.01110.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.011 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.12.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2006.12.009 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2003.12.00310.1016/j.compstruc.2003.12.003 ↗