journal article·2019-06

A progressive damage model for 3D woven composites under compression

Huaiyu Lu, Licheng Guo, Gang Liu, Li Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

A progressive damage model is proposed to investigate the damage initiation and evolution of 3D woven composites under uniaxial compression at a micromechanical level. The typical compressive experiments were carried out. Based on the observations, the compression failure modes of 3D woven composites mainly include fiber kinking, transverse failure of fiber tow, matrix fracture, and interfacial debonding. The initial damage criteria are according to the physically based failure criteria for the fiber kinking, the Puck criteria for the transverse failure of fiber tow, and the maximum stress criterion for the matrix. The damage of fiber tow–matrix interfacial is simulated through cohesive contact. Particularly, the fiber’s initial misalignment angle is taken into account in the damage model. The simulated compression results agree well with the experimental ones. The compressive stress–strain response of the 3D woven composite is forecasted. The damage evolution of each constituent of the 3D woven composite is obtained. The results show that the influence of the fiber’s initial misalignment angle on the compression strength of the 3D woven composite needs to be considered.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Astronautic Science and Mechanics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, P.R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Abaqus · 2016
2. Argon AS · 1972 · 79
3. 10.1177/105678951771508810.1177/1056789517715088 ↗
4. 10.1016/0045-7949(83)90141-410.1016/0045-7949(83)90141-4 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.016 ↗
6. 10.1016/0956-7151(94)90174-010.1016/0956-7151(94)90174-0 ↗
7. 10.1177/108128651453542210.1177/1081286514535422 ↗
8. 10.1177/002199830504645210.1177/0021998305046452 ↗
9. Davila CG, Jaunky N and Goswami S (2003) Failure criteria for FRP laminates in plane stress. In: 44th AIAA-ASMEASCE-AHS-ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference , AIAA Paper 2003–1991, Norfolk, Virginia, USA, 7–10 April 2003.10.2514/6.2003-1991 ↗
10. 10.1177/002199830606807810.1177/0021998306068078 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.09.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2010.09.002 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.02.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2007.02.001 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.10.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2003.10.007 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.07.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2008.07.016 ↗
15. 10.1080/09243046.2015.107567210.1080/09243046.2015.1075672 ↗
16. Ji W and Waas AM (2013) A predictive model for the compressive strength of 3D woven textile composites. In: 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference , Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 8–11 April 2013.10.2514/6.2013-1727 ↗
17. Jumahat A, Soutis C, Jones FR, et al. (2010) Fracture mechanisms and failure analysis of carbon fibre/toughened epoxy composites subjected to compressive loading. Composite Structures 92: 295–305.10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.010 ↗
18. 10.1023/A:101877930793110.1023/A:1018779307931 ↗
19. Liu T · International Journal of Damage Mechanics · 2017 · 0 · 1
20. 10.1007/s00707-017-2024-z10.1007/s00707-017-2024-z ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.024 ↗
22. 10.1177/105678951771123810.1177/1056789517711238 ↗
23. Pankow M · Computers, Materials and Continua · 2012 · 32 · 81
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.016 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.008 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.11.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2012.11.005 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00202-010.1016/S0266-3538(01)00202-0 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00140-610.1016/S0266-3538(96)00140-6 ↗
29. 10.1177/002199830809650010.1177/0021998308096500 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.008 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.03.00810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.03.008 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.09.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2013.09.002 ↗
33. 10.1177/002199830809391210.1177/0021998308093912 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.03.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2015.03.011 ↗
35. 10.1177/105678951665567110.1177/1056789516655671 ↗
36. 10.1177/105678951666361310.1177/1056789516663613 ↗
37. 10.1177/105678951666361310.1177/1056789516663613 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.005 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.004 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.09.05410.1016/j.msea.2003.09.054 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.08810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.088 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.06.03310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.06.033 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.03010.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.030 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.05110.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.051 ↗