Identification of fully coupled anisotropic plasticity and damage constitutive equations using a hybrid experimental–numerical methodology with various triaxialities
Source abstract
Abstract
A hybrid experimental–numerical methodology is presented for the parameter identification of a mixed nonlinear hardening anisotropic plasticity model fully coupled with isotropic ductile damage accounting for microcracks closure effects. In this study, three test materials are chosen: DP1000, CP1200, and AL7020. The experiments involve the tensile tests with smooth and notched specimens and two types of shear tests. The tensile tests with smooth specimens are conducted in different directions with respect to the rolling direction. This helps to determine the plastic anisotropy parameters of the material when the ductile damage is still negligible. Also, in-plane torsion tests with a single loading cycle are used to determine separately the isotropic and kinematic hardening parameters. Finally, tensile tests with notched specimens and Shouler and Allwood shear tests are used for the damage parameters identification. These are conducted until the final fracture with the triaxiality ratio η lying between 0 and [Formula: see text] (i.e. [Formula: see text]). The classical force–displacement curves are chosen as the experimental responses. However, for the tensile test with notched specimens, the distribution of displacement components is measured using a full field measurement technique (ARAMIS system). These experimental results are directly used by the identification methodology in order to determine the “best” values of material parameters involved in the constitutive equations. The inverse identification methodology combines an optimization algorithm which is coded within MATLAB together with the finite element (FE) code ABAQUS/Explicit. After optimization, good agreement between experimental and numerically predicted results in terms of force–displacement curves is obtained for the three studied materials. Finally, the applicability and validity of the determined material parameters are proved with additional validation tests.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Forming Technology and Lightweight Construction, TU Dortmund, Germany
ICD-LASMIS, University of Technology of Troyes, France
Institute of Continuum and Material Mechanics, TU Hamburg-Harburg, Germany
References (75)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0001-6160(66)90170-210.1016/0001-6160(66)90170-2 ↗
2. 10.1016/0022-5096(86)90005-010.1016/0022-5096(86)90005-0 ↗
3. ASTM (2000) D3039-00 Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards , vol. 15, no. 03, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA.
4. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.01.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2010.01.008 ↗
5. Badreddine H, Saanouni K and Nguyen TD (2014) Evolution of the plastic anisotropy induced by anisotropic damage under large plastic strains (submitted to International journal of solids and structures October 2013 to appear in 2014).
6. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.004 ↗
7. 10.1115/1.175524410.1115/1.1755244 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.09.03110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.09.031 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0065-2156(10)44003-X10.1016/S0065-2156(10)44003-X ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.03.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2009.03.001 ↗
11. 10.1177/105678950910348210.1177/1056789509103482 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00022-010.1016/S0749-6419(02)00022-0 ↗
13. 10.1243/030932499151389410.1243/0309324991513894 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.003 ↗
15. Bouchard P-O, Gachet J-M and Roux E (2011) Ductile damage parameters identification for cold metal forming applications. In: Menary G (ed.) The 14th international ESAFORM conference on material forming: ESAFORM 2011 , 27 –29 April 2011, Belfast, UK. AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1353, pp. 47–52.10.1063/1.3589490 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00062-410.1016/S0924-0136(98)00062-4 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.08.01110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.08.011 ↗
18. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.21310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.213 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.03.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2007.03.008 ↗
20. 10.1177/10567895920010020110.1177/105678959200100201 ↗
21. 10.1177/10567895930020040110.1177/105678959300200401 ↗
22. 10.1016/0013-7944(87)90108-110.1016/0013-7944(87)90108-1 ↗
23. 10.1016/0263-8223(93)90203-310.1016/0263-8223(93)90203-3 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.09.01210.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.09.012 ↗
25. 10.1177/105678950910483910.1177/1056789509104839 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.11.02610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.11.026 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00366-009-0149-y10.1007/s00366-009-0149-y ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.08.00810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.08.008 ↗
29. 10.1177/105678950910191710.1177/1056789509101917 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.03.00610.1016/j.ijplas.2009.03.006 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61038-510.1016/S0007-8506(07)61038-5 ↗
32. 10.1016/0924-0136(94)90378-610.1016/0924-0136(94)90378-6 ↗
33. Gologanu M · 1995 · 61
34. 10.1115/1.344340110.1115/1.3443401 ↗
35. Hartley P · Research Mechanica · 1989 · 28 · 269
36. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-910.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
37. 10.1002/srin.19960545310.1002/srin.199605453 ↗
38. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90008-610.1016/0013-7944(85)90008-6 ↗
39. 10.1007/978-3-662-02761-510.1007/978-3-662-02761-5 ↗
40. Lemaitre J · 1985
41. Lemaitre J · 2009
42. Lemaitre J · 2005
43. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.04.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2010.04.001 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0020-7403(97)00136-710.1016/S0020-7403(97)00136-7 ↗
45. 10.1115/1.360120410.1115/1.3601204 ↗
46. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90093-110.1016/0013-7944(85)90093-1 ↗
47. Merklein M and Biasutti M (2011) Forward and reverse simple shear test experiments for material modeling in forming simulations. In: Steel research international, Special edition: 10th international conference on technology of plasticity . Aachen, Germany, vol. 1, pp. 702–707.
48. 10.1007/978-94-007-2666-610.1007/978-94-007-2666-6 ↗
49. 10.1115/1.344346610.1115/1.3443466 ↗
50. 10.1002/nme.162025011810.1002/nme.1620250118 ↗
51. 10.1016/0167-6636(85)90007-910.1016/0167-6636(85)90007-9 ↗
52. 10.1016/S0022-5096(03)00087-510.1016/S0022-5096(03)00087-5 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0749-6419(99)00035-210.1016/S0749-6419(99)00035-2 ↗
54. 10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-710.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
55. 10.1016/0029-5493(87)90234-210.1016/0029-5493(87)90234-2 ↗
56. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00013-810.1016/S0022-5096(01)00013-8 ↗
57. 10.1002/978111856219210.1002/9781118562192 ↗
58. 10.1016/B0-08-043749-4/03072-X10.1016/B0-08-043749-4/03072-X ↗
59. 10.1177/10567895940030020310.1177/105678959400300203 ↗
60. Saanouni K · 2000 · 353
61. 10.1177/105678950934368810.1177/1056789509343688 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.03.01910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.03.019 ↗
63. 10.1016/0020-7683(87)90083-710.1016/0020-7683(87)90083-7 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.12.02210.1016/j.commatsci.2009.12.022 ↗
65. Soyarslan C · Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics · 2008 · 88 · 436
66. 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70195-910.1016/S0065-2156(08)70195-9 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.08.03310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.08.033 ↗
68. 10.1016/0020-7225(92)90059-P10.1016/0020-7225(92)90059-P ↗
69. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.12.02610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.12.026 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.02.00810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.02.008 ↗
71. 10.1016/S0749-6419(03)00063-910.1016/S0749-6419(03)00063-9 ↗
72. 10.1016/S0020-7403(97)00052-010.1016/S0020-7403(97)00052-0 ↗
73. 10.1179/143307511X1285895767539010.1179/143307511X12858957675390 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.02.00510.1016/j.ijplas.2009.02.005 ↗
75. 10.1016/0924-0136(92)90177-T10.1016/0924-0136(92)90177-T ↗