Comparison of fracture behavior of defective armchair and zigzag graphene nanoribbons
Source abstract
Abstract
Molecular dynamics simulations of armchair graphene nanoribbons and zigzag graphene nanoribbons with different sizes were performed at room temperature. Double vacancy defects were introduced in each graphene nanoribbon at its center or at its edge. The effect of defect on the mechanical behavior was studied by comparing the stress–strain response and the fracture toughness of each pair of pristine and defective graphene nanoribbon. Results show that the effect of vacancies in zigzag graphene nanoribbon is more profound than in armchair graphene nanoribbon. Also, the effect of double vacancy defect on the ultimate failure stress is greater in zigzag graphene nanoribbons than in armchair graphene nanoribbon due to bond orientation with respect to loading direction. Strength reduction can be as high as 17.5% in armchair graphene nanoribbon with no significant difference between single and double vacancies, while for zigzag graphene nanoribbon, the strength reduction is up to 30% for single vacancy and 43% for double vacancy defects. It is observed that for zigzag graphene nanoribbon with double vacancy at the edge, the direction of the failure plane is oriented at ±30° with respect to the loading direction while it is always perpendicular to the direction of loading in armchair graphene nanoribbon. Results have been verified through studying the fracture toughness parameters in each case as well.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, USA
Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, USA
Funding
Office of Naval Research
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.spmi.2011.11.01910.1016/j.spmi.2011.11.019 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ssc.2011.05.02110.1016/j.ssc.2011.05.021 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat306410.1038/nmat3064 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl073187210.1021/nl0731872 ↗
5. 10.1021/nn102598m10.1021/nn102598m ↗
6. 10.1088/0953-8984/14/4/31210.1088/0953-8984/14/4/312 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.487130410.1063/1.4871304 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.481301010.1063/1.4813010 ↗
9. Chu Y and Basaran C (2012) Review of Joule heating in graphene nano-ribbon. In: Thirteenth IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (ITherm), San Diego, CA, USA, 2012, pp.7–9.10.1109/ITHERM.2012.6231406 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.489555310.1063/1.4895553 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.10.00610.1016/j.commatsci.2015.10.006 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.01610.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.016 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.03010.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.030 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)NM.2153-5477.000010110.1061/(ASCE)NM.2153-5477.0000101 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.10.03110.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.10.031 ↗
16. 10.1115/1.402768110.1115/1.4027681 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.22550210.1103/PhysRevLett.92.225502 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.115949910.1126/science.1159499 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.07.02210.1016/j.commatsci.2016.07.022 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.20680510.1103/PhysRevLett.98.206805 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.490558310.1063/1.4905583 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.24541310.1103/PhysRevB.74.245413 ↗
23. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-510.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.07541210.1103/PhysRevB.75.075412 ↗
25. 10.1038/nature0771910.1038/nature07719 ↗
26. 10.1088/0965-0393/19/5/05400610.1088/0965-0393/19/5/054006 ↗
27. 10.1007/s12274-010-1022-410.1007/s12274-010-1022-4 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.04.00410.1016/j.carbon.2004.04.004 ↗
29. 10.1126/science.110289610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
30. Ovid’ko I · Reviews on Advanced Material Science · 2013 · 34 · 1
31. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.01410.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.014 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.06410110.1103/PhysRevB.88.064101 ↗
33. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 117: 1–19.10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.05.02210.1016/j.commatsci.2009.05.022 ↗
35. 10.1126/science.114288210.1126/science.1142882 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.387710.1103/PhysRevB.61.3877 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.48120810.1063/1.481208 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.10.03210.1016/j.commatsci.2011.10.032 ↗
39. 10.1166/jctn.2009.108210.1166/jctn.2009.1082 ↗
40. 10.1177/105678951664564510.1177/1056789516645645 ↗
41. 10.1177/105678951667179510.1177/1056789516671795 ↗
42. 10.1038/ncomms478210.1038/ncomms4782 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.09411410.1103/PhysRevB.76.094114 ↗
44. 10.1007/s10704-015-0039-910.1007/s10704-015-0039-9 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.348862010.1063/1.3488620 ↗
46. 10.1021/nl901448z10.1021/nl901448z ↗