journal article·2016-07

A generalised damage model for masonry under compression

Tatheer Zahra, Manicka Dhanasekar

Publisher page

Abstract

A generalised model based on damage mechanics for predicting the response of masonry subjected to compression is presented. The model accounts for the behaviour of the constituents of the masonry, viz., the units, the mortar and the unit–mortar interfaces; in this paper, the unit–mortar interfaces and the mortar layers have been treated as a homogenised continuum. The principles of damage mechanics coupled with limiting damage surfaces have been used to simulate the behaviour of the masonry constituents. The novelty is the use of a non-linear, progressively stiffening stress–strain curve to simulate the viscoelastic behaviour of the homogenised mortar–interface (for conventional masonry) or dry surface–interface (for dry-stack masonry) layers until a threshold strain is reached. Beyond the threshold strain, their behaviour is assumed to have changed to progressive softening common for concrete like materials. The damage model for compression and tension due to progressive stiffening and softening criteria respectively have been formulated for the masonry constituents. The parameters which characterise the tensile and compressive behaviours, the volumetric change and the damage behaviour of the masonry constituents have been calibrated using some available experimental data in the literature. The model is shown to predict the average compressive strength and stress–strain behaviour of the masonry prisms appropriately. The model is capable of capturing the behaviour including appropriate stiffness degradation and post peak softening that are comparable to the experimental predictions reported in the literature for various types of masonry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Building materials and conservation · Hygrothermal properties of building materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Andolfato RP, Camacho JS and Mauricio RM (2004) Study of structural masonry concrete block units and prisms varying the blocks cement quantity and degree of compaction. In: 7th Australasian masonry conference , Newcastle, Australia, 13–16 July 2004, pp.150–160. University of Newcastle. ISBN: 1920701419, 9781920701413.
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.02410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.024 ↗
3. 10.1016/0020-7683(94)00140-R10.1016/0020-7683(94)00140-R ↗
4. 10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00090-210.1016/S0958-9465(02)00090-2 ↗
5. 10.1617/s11527-009-9492-010.1617/s11527-009-9492-0 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.09.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.09.005 ↗
7. Besson J · 2010
8. 10.1007/BF0247935110.1007/BF02479351 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:2(209)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:2(209) ↗
10. Das S, Liu J, El-Sayed M, et al. (2013) Effect of height-to-thickness ratio on compressive Strength of hollow concrete masonry. In: 12th Canadian masonry symposium (CMS 2013) , Vancouver, British Columbia, 2–5 June 2013.
11. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.00210.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.002 ↗
12. Izquierdo OS, Corrêa MRS and Soto II (2012) The influence of mortar bedding on the compressive strength of concrete block masonry structures. In: 15th International brick and block masonry conference (IB2MaC 2012) , Florianopolis, Brazil, 3–6 June 2012.
13. 10.1680/coma.2006.159.3.11110.1680/coma.2006.159.3.111 ↗
14. 10.1007/978-94-017-1957-510.1007/978-94-017-1957-5 ↗
15. 10.1177/105678950606591410.1177/1056789506065914 ↗
16. Koksal HO · Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE · 2005 · 17 · 107
17. Krajcinovic D · 1996
18. 10.1007/978-3-662-02761-510.1007/978-3-662-02761-5 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.00910.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.009 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(857)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(857) ↗
21. 10.1177/105678950606494310.1177/1056789506064943 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.00910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.009 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.08710.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.087 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.11.00310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.11.003 ↗
25. Murakami S · 2012
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.02810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.028 ↗
27. 10.2140/jomms.2014.9.38510.2140/jomms.2014.9.385 ↗
28. 10.1016/0020-7683(92)90052-U10.1016/0020-7683(92)90052-U ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cma.2010.11.01010.1016/j.cma.2010.11.010 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.07.01010.1016/j.compstruc.2014.07.010 ↗
31. Ramamurthy K · ACI Structural Journal · 2000 · 97 · 61
32. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.09.00910.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.09.009 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:5(1020)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:5(1020) ↗
34. 10.1002/pen.76031021210.1002/pen.760310212 ↗
35. 10.7158/S12-035.2013.14.310.7158/S12-035.2013.14.3 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.09510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.095 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.05410.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.054 ↗