Probabilistic modeling of unified S-N curves for mechanical parts
Source abstract
Abstract
This article aims at modeling unified S-N curves based on multifailure modes and stress ratios. Heterogeneous mixture distributions are used to describe life distribution of multifailure modes. Bayes clustering is applied to cluster failure data to avoid convergence to global optima. Derived from regression analysis, failure data are compensated by nonrandom error. The relationship between distribution parameters and stress is established, and the ultimately unified probabilistic S-N curve is modeled. Two assumptions are presented to modify an original S-N curve model with varied stress ratios. The first one is to take into account the effects of low-amplitude load “exercising,” which we call results in the “pseudo-fatigue damage.” The other one is to set up probability density function of fatigue limit considering uncertainty. Combined with material parameters modification, thus a new modified and unified S-N curves model is available for not only researchers, but engineers as well.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12206-010-1006-z10.1007/s12206-010-1006-z ↗
2. Basquin OH (1919) The exponential law of endurance tests. Proceedings of ASTM 10: 625–630.
3. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1959.tb00349.x10.1111/j.2517-6161.1959.tb00349.x ↗
4. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.04.01510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.04.015 ↗
6. Gao ZT · 1981
7. 10.1007/s11071-015-2595-y10.1007/s11071-015-2595-y ↗
8. 10.1631/jzus.A140032110.1631/jzus.A1400321 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.fss.2005.11.00910.1016/j.fss.2005.11.009 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.021 ↗
11. 10.1115/1.365733210.1115/1.3657332 ↗
12. 10.1002/nme.147910.1002/nme.1479 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0324623610.1007/BF03246236 ↗
14. 10.1093/biomet/45.3-4.50410.1093/biomet/45.3-4.504 ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2012.01711.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2012.01711.x ↗
16. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2015.07.00610.1016/j.tafmec.2015.07.006 ↗
17. 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.30.5010.3221/IGF-ESIS.30.50 ↗
18. 10.1080/00401706.1999.1048592510.1080/00401706.1999.10485925 ↗
19. 10.1177/105678951562091010.1177/1056789515620910 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.07.01710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.07.017 ↗
21. Stephens RI · 2000
22. Wang JL · Journal of Jilin University Engineering and Technology Edition · 2014 · 44 · 1010
23. 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4132.2011.05.00810.3969/j.issn.1004-4132.2011.05.008 ↗
24. 10.1177/105678951557676610.1177/1056789515576766 ↗
25. Weibull W · 1961
26. 10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.01310.1016/j.ress.2015.12.013 ↗
27. 10.1002/nav.2154810.1002/nav.21548 ↗
28. Xu YZ · Journal of Vibration & Shock · 2013 · 32 · 35
29. 10.1177/105678951560823210.1177/1056789515608232 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.008 ↗
31. Zheng SL · Automotive Engineering · 2006 · 28 · 468
32. 10.3901/CJME.2011.06.111110.3901/CJME.2011.06.1111 ↗
33. 10.1177/105678951039707710.1177/1056789510397077 ↗