journal article·2011-11

Static and Fatigue Failures of Adhesively Bonded Laminate Joints in Moist Environments

K. B. Katnam, A. D. Crocombe, H. Sugiman, H. Khoramishad, I. A. Ashcroft

Publisher page

Abstract

Advanced structural adhesives are now an important joining technique in automobile and aerospace applications. The perceived uncertainty in the long-term structural performance of bonded members when subjected to static/fatigue loads in aggressive environments is probably restricting an even more widespread use of this joining technology. In this article, the effect of moisture on the static and fatigue resistances of adhesively bonded laminate joints was investigated. Experimental tests were performed on both aged and unaged adhesively bonded laminate joints for static and fatigue responses. Further, using a cohesive zone approach for the adhesive bondlines, a combined diffusion–stress analysis was developed to predict the progressive damage observed in the joints tested experimentally. The numerical predictions were found to be in good agreement with the experimental test results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical, Medical and Aerospace Engineering (MMA), Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK

Wolfson School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00132-910.1016/S1359-835X(00)00132-9 ↗
2. Adams R.D. · 1997
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.024 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0143-7496(96)00038-310.1016/S0143-7496(96)00038-3 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-210.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
6. 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
7. 10.1016/0143-7496(96)00001-210.1016/0143-7496(96)00001-2 ↗
8. 10.1016/0143-7496(90)90042-V10.1016/0143-7496(90)90042-V ↗
9. 10.1016/S0143-7496(97)00008-010.1016/S0143-7496(97)00008-0 ↗
10. 10.1039/jm996060047910.1039/jm9960600479 ↗
11. 10.1016/0143-7496(92)90053-X10.1016/0143-7496(92)90053-X ↗
12. 10.1080/0021846980800995810.1080/00218469808009958 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.06.00310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.06.003 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.02.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.02.001 ↗
15. 10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-210.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
16. 10.1016/0143-7496(96)89799-510.1016/0143-7496(96)89799-5 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.08.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.08.005 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0143-7496(96)00027-910.1016/S0143-7496(96)00027-9 ↗
19. Katnam K.B. · Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology · 2009
20. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.08.02310.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.08.023 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.02.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2004.02.016 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.01310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.013 ↗
23. Kinloch A.J. (1983). Durability of Structural Adhesives, Amsterdam, Elsevier Applied Science, 30–31, (ISBN 0853342148).
24. Kinloch A.J. · 1995
25. Liljedahl C.D.M. · 2006
26. 10.1080/0021846060094849510.1080/00218460600948495 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.02.00210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.02.002 ↗
28. 10.1080/0021846850807493410.1080/00218468508074934 ↗
29. 10.1016/0143-7496(92)90028-T10.1016/0143-7496(92)90028-T ↗
30. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(19960916)24:9<583::AID-SIA159>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(19960916)24:9<583::AID-SIA159>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
31. 10.1163/156856104158129810.1163/1568561041581298 ↗
32. Rodriguez F. · 1996
33. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.07.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.07.005 ↗
34. 10.1080/0021846970801456010.1080/00218469708014560 ↗
35. 10.1080/0021846970801441510.1080/00218469708014415 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00221-310.1016/S0020-7683(00)00221-3 ↗